Assessing the influence of connected and automated mobility on the liveability of cities

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Gillian Harrison , Joseph Stanford , Hannah Rakoff , Scott Smith , Simon Shepherd , Yvonne Barnard , Satu Innamaa
{"title":"Assessing the influence of connected and automated mobility on the liveability of cities","authors":"Gillian Harrison ,&nbsp;Joseph Stanford ,&nbsp;Hannah Rakoff ,&nbsp;Scott Smith ,&nbsp;Simon Shepherd ,&nbsp;Yvonne Barnard ,&nbsp;Satu Innamaa","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work we are concerned with how the introduction of connected and automated mobility (CAM) will influence liveability in cities. We engaged with city and transport planners from both Europe and the U.S. and adopted a system dynamics approach to capturing the discussions and exploring potential outcomes. There are two aims in doing this: (1) to identify the concerns of city planners and how they differ from the traditional focus of transport researchers; but also (2) to develop a causal loop diagram (CLD) that can both explore the potential systemic effects of CAM and help to communicate those effects and the underlying mental models. Addressing these aims can inform policy design related to both CAM specifically and urban mobility more generally. In a change from previous related studies, we allowed the participants to establish their concept of liveability in cities and did not define a specific CAM scenario. This broad scope was critical in capturing the high-level view of what really matters to city stakeholders. We have established that a focus on a more holistic understanding of interactions related to sustainability is required rather than on specific transport modes or technology. A key insight that emerged was that quality of life (QoL) was the dominant concern of city planners, regardless of how it is achieved. The specifics of new services or technologies (such as CAM) are secondary concerns - which are important only insofar as they support the higher goal of improving QoL. As a result, we have produced a high level CLD that can be used as a starter for any future research in the area of CAM and liveability in cities and which may resonate better than previous CAM models have with city planners and policy makers—those who will ultimately play a key role in recommending and then implementing changes affecting QoL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266709172200022X/pdfft?md5=ec3be55412f7feeb4de68ccd99b79649&pid=1-s2.0-S266709172200022X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266709172200022X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work we are concerned with how the introduction of connected and automated mobility (CAM) will influence liveability in cities. We engaged with city and transport planners from both Europe and the U.S. and adopted a system dynamics approach to capturing the discussions and exploring potential outcomes. There are two aims in doing this: (1) to identify the concerns of city planners and how they differ from the traditional focus of transport researchers; but also (2) to develop a causal loop diagram (CLD) that can both explore the potential systemic effects of CAM and help to communicate those effects and the underlying mental models. Addressing these aims can inform policy design related to both CAM specifically and urban mobility more generally. In a change from previous related studies, we allowed the participants to establish their concept of liveability in cities and did not define a specific CAM scenario. This broad scope was critical in capturing the high-level view of what really matters to city stakeholders. We have established that a focus on a more holistic understanding of interactions related to sustainability is required rather than on specific transport modes or technology. A key insight that emerged was that quality of life (QoL) was the dominant concern of city planners, regardless of how it is achieved. The specifics of new services or technologies (such as CAM) are secondary concerns - which are important only insofar as they support the higher goal of improving QoL. As a result, we have produced a high level CLD that can be used as a starter for any future research in the area of CAM and liveability in cities and which may resonate better than previous CAM models have with city planners and policy makers—those who will ultimately play a key role in recommending and then implementing changes affecting QoL.

评估互联和自动化交通对城市宜居性的影响
在这项工作中,我们关注的是联网和自动化移动(CAM)的引入将如何影响城市的宜居性。我们与来自欧洲和美国的城市和交通规划者进行了接触,并采用了系统动力学方法来捕捉讨论并探索潜在结果。这样做有两个目的:(1)确定城市规划者的关注点,以及他们与交通研究人员的传统关注点有何不同;而且(2)开发因果循环图(CLD),该因果循环图既可以探索CAM的潜在系统效应,又有助于传达这些效应和潜在的心理模型。实现这些目标可以为CAM和更广泛的城市流动性相关的政策设计提供信息。与之前的相关研究不同,我们允许参与者建立他们在城市中的宜居性概念,而没有定义特定的CAM场景。这种广泛的范围对于捕捉对城市利益相关者真正重要的高层观点至关重要。我们已经确定,需要更全面地理解与可持续性相关的互动,而不是特定的运输模式或技术。出现的一个关键见解是,生活质量(QoL)是城市规划者最关心的问题,无论它是如何实现的。新服务或技术(如CAM)的细节是次要考虑的问题,只有当它们支持提高生活质量的更高目标时,这些问题才是重要的。因此,我们制作了一个高水平的CLD,可以作为未来CAM和城市宜居性领域研究的起点,它可能比以前的CAM模型更能引起城市规划者和政策制定者的共鸣,他们最终将在建议和实施影响生活质量的变革中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信