Ready for robots? Assessment of autonomous delivery robot operative accessibility in German cities

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Martin Plank , Clément Lemardelé , Tom Assmann , Sebastian Zug
{"title":"Ready for robots? Assessment of autonomous delivery robot operative accessibility in German cities","authors":"Martin Plank ,&nbsp;Clément Lemardelé ,&nbsp;Tom Assmann ,&nbsp;Sebastian Zug","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unlike autonomous car applications, the operational area of urban service autonomous robots like autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) is not clearly defined at the moment. Due to large variations in the different robot designs, specific local infrastructure and regulation, assessing the feasibility of different operational scenarios is difficult. This paper presents a prototype evaluation methodology based on Open Street Map data for the assessment of ADR deployments considering one-to-many delivery schemes. Four different robot configurations and potential operational specifications are modeled and evaluated in a sample of German cities. The bandwidth of considered robot types ranges from large ADRs operating on roadways down to small size systems operating on sidewalks. The performance of the first category is limited by the reduced accessibility in areas with higher traffic. On the contrary, small ADRs present a higher detour time but increased accessibility. The evaluated operational scenarios show very diverse performance depending on the considered metrics and cities. For all the metrics considered in the paper, sidewalk ADRs show poor performance when compared to other potential ADR deployments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091722000243/pdfft?md5=1de5ac789613a8c7076f9706b6358120&pid=1-s2.0-S2667091722000243-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091722000243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Unlike autonomous car applications, the operational area of urban service autonomous robots like autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) is not clearly defined at the moment. Due to large variations in the different robot designs, specific local infrastructure and regulation, assessing the feasibility of different operational scenarios is difficult. This paper presents a prototype evaluation methodology based on Open Street Map data for the assessment of ADR deployments considering one-to-many delivery schemes. Four different robot configurations and potential operational specifications are modeled and evaluated in a sample of German cities. The bandwidth of considered robot types ranges from large ADRs operating on roadways down to small size systems operating on sidewalks. The performance of the first category is limited by the reduced accessibility in areas with higher traffic. On the contrary, small ADRs present a higher detour time but increased accessibility. The evaluated operational scenarios show very diverse performance depending on the considered metrics and cities. For all the metrics considered in the paper, sidewalk ADRs show poor performance when compared to other potential ADR deployments.

准备好迎接机器人了吗?德国城市自动配送机器人操作可达性评估
与自动驾驶汽车应用不同,像自动配送机器人(ADR)这样的城市服务自动驾驶机器人的操作区域目前还没有明确定义。由于不同的机器人设计、特定的地方基础设施和法规存在很大差异,评估不同操作场景的可行性很困难。本文提出了一种基于开放街道地图数据的原型评估方法,用于评估考虑一对多交付方案的ADR部署。以德国城市为样本,对四种不同的机器人配置和潜在的操作规范进行了建模和评估。所考虑的机器人类型的带宽范围从在道路上运行的大型ADR到在人行道上运行的小型系统。第一类的性能受到交通流量较高地区可达性降低的限制。相反,小型ADR具有较高的绕行时间,但增加了可达性。根据所考虑的指标和城市,评估的运营场景显示出非常多样化的性能。对于论文中考虑的所有指标,与其他潜在ADR部署相比,人行道ADR表现出较差的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信