Pedaling through a virtually redesigned city: Evaluation of traffic planning and urban design factors influencing bicycle traffic

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Daniela Ullmann, Julian Kreimeier, Harald Kipke
{"title":"Pedaling through a virtually redesigned city: Evaluation of traffic planning and urban design factors influencing bicycle traffic","authors":"Daniela Ullmann,&nbsp;Julian Kreimeier,&nbsp;Harald Kipke","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To achieve the 1.5-degree target of the Paris Climate Agreement, it is of great importance to promote environmentally friendly means of transport. In urban areas, shifting motorized trips to active transport modes (i.e., walking and cycling) is essential. Therefore, knowledge of walking and cycling is indispensable for planning and policy, which is the basis for targeted promotion of active forms of mobility. This paper aims to identify factors that specifically influence cycling and to derive recommendations for action for planning and policy in a virtual testbed. Specifically, the influence of traffic planning measures (i.e., structural infrastructure facilities for stationary and moving traffic as well as traffic regulations) and urban design measures (i.e., the design of public space) on the promotion of cycling will be shown. For this purpose, a virtual reality simulation was used, independent of different external conditions during field surveys and the necessity of time-, cost- and regulation-intensive structural changes. Using an improved bicycle simulator, 93 people cycled through 20 variations of an approximately 680 m long road section, surveying the effect of selected traffic planning and urban design parameters. Special attention was paid to the subjective safety of the cyclists and the attractiveness of the urban environment. Furthermore, three types of infrastructure were differentiated: No bicycle infrastructure (riding on the roadway), a bicycle lane, and a structurally separated cycle path next to the sidewalk. The virtual road section represented a real location. In addition to the findings gained from the physiological optimization of the simulator, the results show that roadside greenery had the highest effectiveness in terms of subjective safety and attractiveness. Other factors with a high influence were a speed reduction from 50 to 30 km/h when riding on the roadway with cars and the red coloring of the bicycle lane, each increasing the perception of safety. In contrast, a lack of a boundary line between the cycle path and the sidewalk was unsettling for those who rarely or never ride bicycles in their daily lives. In addition, restaurant and recreation areas increased the attractiveness of the road section, although entailing a lower perception of safety. Other factors, such as motor vehicle traffic volume or vehicles parked at the roadside, showed no significant effects on the evaluation of cycling.</p><p>With the help of these findings, the consequences of traffic planning and urban design measures can be better assessed in subsequent virtual testbeds. Also, initial trends can be identified as to which planning instruments should be used as a priority to promote cycling in urban areas. Future work should validate the transfer of these insights into physical urban spaces to support further the mid-term transformation towards sustainable urban mobility using scientific evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091722000206/pdfft?md5=2e303cd3877fa98f677bee5cca4f8d2d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667091722000206-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091722000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To achieve the 1.5-degree target of the Paris Climate Agreement, it is of great importance to promote environmentally friendly means of transport. In urban areas, shifting motorized trips to active transport modes (i.e., walking and cycling) is essential. Therefore, knowledge of walking and cycling is indispensable for planning and policy, which is the basis for targeted promotion of active forms of mobility. This paper aims to identify factors that specifically influence cycling and to derive recommendations for action for planning and policy in a virtual testbed. Specifically, the influence of traffic planning measures (i.e., structural infrastructure facilities for stationary and moving traffic as well as traffic regulations) and urban design measures (i.e., the design of public space) on the promotion of cycling will be shown. For this purpose, a virtual reality simulation was used, independent of different external conditions during field surveys and the necessity of time-, cost- and regulation-intensive structural changes. Using an improved bicycle simulator, 93 people cycled through 20 variations of an approximately 680 m long road section, surveying the effect of selected traffic planning and urban design parameters. Special attention was paid to the subjective safety of the cyclists and the attractiveness of the urban environment. Furthermore, three types of infrastructure were differentiated: No bicycle infrastructure (riding on the roadway), a bicycle lane, and a structurally separated cycle path next to the sidewalk. The virtual road section represented a real location. In addition to the findings gained from the physiological optimization of the simulator, the results show that roadside greenery had the highest effectiveness in terms of subjective safety and attractiveness. Other factors with a high influence were a speed reduction from 50 to 30 km/h when riding on the roadway with cars and the red coloring of the bicycle lane, each increasing the perception of safety. In contrast, a lack of a boundary line between the cycle path and the sidewalk was unsettling for those who rarely or never ride bicycles in their daily lives. In addition, restaurant and recreation areas increased the attractiveness of the road section, although entailing a lower perception of safety. Other factors, such as motor vehicle traffic volume or vehicles parked at the roadside, showed no significant effects on the evaluation of cycling.

With the help of these findings, the consequences of traffic planning and urban design measures can be better assessed in subsequent virtual testbeds. Also, initial trends can be identified as to which planning instruments should be used as a priority to promote cycling in urban areas. Future work should validate the transfer of these insights into physical urban spaces to support further the mid-term transformation towards sustainable urban mobility using scientific evidence.

在几乎重新设计的城市中骑行:影响自行车交通的交通规划和城市设计因素评估
为了实现《巴黎气候协定》的1.5度目标,推广环保交通工具至关重要。在城市地区,将机动出行转变为积极的交通方式(即步行和骑自行车)至关重要。因此,步行和骑自行车的知识对于规划和政策是必不可少的,这是有针对性地促进积极的流动形式的基础。本文旨在确定具体影响自行车运动的因素,并在虚拟试验台中得出规划和政策的行动建议。具体而言,将展示交通规划措施(即固定和移动交通的结构基础设施以及交通法规)和城市设计措施(即公共空间设计)对促进自行车运动的影响。为此,使用了虚拟现实模拟,独立于实地调查期间的不同外部条件以及时间、成本和监管密集型结构变化的必要性。使用改进的自行车模拟器,93人在大约680米长的路段上骑行了20种变体,调查了选定的交通规划和城市设计参数的影响。特别注意骑车人的主观安全和城市环境的吸引力。此外,还区分了三种类型的基础设施:无自行车基础设施(在道路上骑行)、自行车道和人行道旁结构分离的自行车道。虚拟路段表示真实位置。除了从模拟器的生理优化中获得的结果外,结果还表明,路边绿化在主观安全性和吸引力方面具有最高的有效性。其他影响较大的因素包括在有车的道路上骑行时速度从50公里/小时降低到30公里/小时,以及自行车道的红色,每一种都增加了安全感。相比之下,对于那些在日常生活中很少或从不骑自行车的人来说,自行车道和人行道之间缺乏边界线是令人不安的。此外,餐厅和娱乐区增加了路段的吸引力,尽管这意味着安全感较低。其他因素,如机动车交通量或路边停放的车辆,对自行车的评估没有显著影响。借助这些发现,交通规划和城市设计措施的后果可以在随后的虚拟试验台中得到更好的评估。此外,可以确定哪些规划工具应作为优先事项用于促进城市地区自行车运动的初步趋势。未来的工作应该验证将这些见解转移到城市物理空间,以利用科学证据进一步支持向可持续城市流动性的中期转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信