An explorative multiverse study for extracting differences in P3 latencies between young and old adults.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14459
Kathrin Sadus, Anna-Lena Schubert, Christoph Löffler, Dirk Hagemann
{"title":"An explorative multiverse study for extracting differences in P3 latencies between young and old adults.","authors":"Kathrin Sadus, Anna-Lena Schubert, Christoph Löffler, Dirk Hagemann","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well established that P3 latencies increase with age. Investigating these age-related differences requires numerous methodological decisions, resulting in pipelines of great variation. The aim of the present work was to investigate the effects of different analytical pipelines on the age-related differences in P3 latencies in real data. Therefore, we conducted an explorative multiverse study and varied the low-pass filter (4 Hz, 8 Hz, 16 Hz, 32 Hz, and no filter), the latency type (area vs. peak), the level of event-related potential analysis (single participant vs. jackknifing), and the extraction method (manual vs. automated). Thirty young (18-21 years) and 30 old (50-60 years) participants completed three tasks (Nback task, Switching task, Flanker task), while an EEG was recorded. The results show that different analysis strategies can have a tremendous impact on the detection and magnitude of the age effect, with effect sizes ranging from 0% to 88% explained variance. Likewise, regarding the psychometric properties of P3 latencies, we found that the reliabilities fluctuated between r<sub>tt</sub>  = .20 and 1.00, while the homogeneities ranged from r<sub>h</sub>  = -.12 to .90. Based on predefined criteria, we found that the most effective pipelines relied on a manual extraction based on a single participant's data. For peak latencies, manual extraction performed well for all filters except for 4 Hz, while for area latencies, filters above 8 Hz produced desirable results. Furthermore, our findings add to the evidence that jackknifing combined with peak latencies can lead to inconclusive results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that P3 latencies increase with age. Investigating these age-related differences requires numerous methodological decisions, resulting in pipelines of great variation. The aim of the present work was to investigate the effects of different analytical pipelines on the age-related differences in P3 latencies in real data. Therefore, we conducted an explorative multiverse study and varied the low-pass filter (4 Hz, 8 Hz, 16 Hz, 32 Hz, and no filter), the latency type (area vs. peak), the level of event-related potential analysis (single participant vs. jackknifing), and the extraction method (manual vs. automated). Thirty young (18-21 years) and 30 old (50-60 years) participants completed three tasks (Nback task, Switching task, Flanker task), while an EEG was recorded. The results show that different analysis strategies can have a tremendous impact on the detection and magnitude of the age effect, with effect sizes ranging from 0% to 88% explained variance. Likewise, regarding the psychometric properties of P3 latencies, we found that the reliabilities fluctuated between rtt  = .20 and 1.00, while the homogeneities ranged from rh  = -.12 to .90. Based on predefined criteria, we found that the most effective pipelines relied on a manual extraction based on a single participant's data. For peak latencies, manual extraction performed well for all filters except for 4 Hz, while for area latencies, filters above 8 Hz produced desirable results. Furthermore, our findings add to the evidence that jackknifing combined with peak latencies can lead to inconclusive results.

一项探索性多元宇宙研究,用于提取年轻人和老年人P3潜伏期的差异。
众所周知,P3潜伏期随着年龄的增长而增加。调查这些与年龄相关的差异需要大量的方法决策,从而产生巨大的差异。本工作的目的是研究不同分析管道对真实数据中P3潜伏期与年龄相关差异的影响。因此,我们进行了一项探索性的多元宇宙研究,并改变了低通滤波器(4 赫兹,8 赫兹,16 赫兹,32 Hz,无滤波器)、潜伏期类型(面积与峰值)、事件相关电位分析水平(单个参与者与夹刀)和提取方法(手动与自动)。30岁(18-21岁) 岁)和30岁(50-60岁 年)参与者完成了三项任务(Nback任务、Switching任务、Flanker任务),同时记录了脑电图。结果表明,不同的分析策略会对年龄效应的检测和大小产生巨大影响,效应大小在0%到88%之间,可以解释方差。同样,关于P3潜伏期的心理测量特性,我们发现可靠性在rtt之间波动 = .20和1.00,而均匀性范围为rh = -.12至0.90。基于预定义的标准,我们发现最有效的管道依赖于基于单个参与者数据的手动提取。对于峰值延迟,除4个滤波器外,所有滤波器的手动提取都表现良好 Hz,而对于区域延迟,滤波器高于8 Hz产生了理想的结果。此外,我们的研究结果进一步证明,夹刀和峰值潜伏期相结合会导致不确定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信