Diagnostic Yield of NGS Tests for Hereditary Ataxia: a Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Cerebellum Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s12311-023-01629-y
Renata Barreto Tenorio, Carlos Henrique F Camargo, Karina Carvalho Donis, Claudia Choma Bettega Almeida, Hélio A G Teive
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield of NGS Tests for Hereditary Ataxia: a Systematic Review.","authors":"Renata Barreto Tenorio, Carlos Henrique F Camargo, Karina Carvalho Donis, Claudia Choma Bettega Almeida, Hélio A G Teive","doi":"10.1007/s12311-023-01629-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Next-generation sequencing (NGS), comprising targeted panels (TP), exome sequencing (ES), and genome sequencing (GS) became robust clinical tools for diagnosing hereditary ataxia (HA). Determining their diagnostic yield (DY) is crucial for optimal clinical decision-making. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review on the DY of NGS tests for HA. We searched PubMed and Embase databases for relevant studies between 2016 and 2022 and manually examined reference lists of relevant reviews. Eligible studies described the DY of NGS tests in patients with ataxia as a significant feature. Data from 33 eligible studies showed a median DY of 43% (IQR = 9.5-100%). The median DY for TP and ES was 46% and 41.9%, respectively. Higher DY was associated with specific phenotype selection, such as episodic ataxia at 68.35% and early and late onset of ataxia at 46.4% and 54.4%. Parental consanguinity had a DY of 52.4% (p = 0.009), and the presumed autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance pattern showed 62.5%. There was a difference between the median DY of studies that performed targeted sequencing (tandem repeat expansion, TRE) screening and those that did not (p = 0.047). A weak inverse correlation was found between DY and the extent of previous genetic investigation (rho = - 0.323; p = 0.065). The most common genes were CACNA1A and SACS. DY was higher for presumed AR inheritance pattern, positive family history, and parental consanguinity. ES appears more advantageous due to the inclusion of rare genes that might be excluded in TP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50706,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-023-01629-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS), comprising targeted panels (TP), exome sequencing (ES), and genome sequencing (GS) became robust clinical tools for diagnosing hereditary ataxia (HA). Determining their diagnostic yield (DY) is crucial for optimal clinical decision-making. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review on the DY of NGS tests for HA. We searched PubMed and Embase databases for relevant studies between 2016 and 2022 and manually examined reference lists of relevant reviews. Eligible studies described the DY of NGS tests in patients with ataxia as a significant feature. Data from 33 eligible studies showed a median DY of 43% (IQR = 9.5-100%). The median DY for TP and ES was 46% and 41.9%, respectively. Higher DY was associated with specific phenotype selection, such as episodic ataxia at 68.35% and early and late onset of ataxia at 46.4% and 54.4%. Parental consanguinity had a DY of 52.4% (p = 0.009), and the presumed autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance pattern showed 62.5%. There was a difference between the median DY of studies that performed targeted sequencing (tandem repeat expansion, TRE) screening and those that did not (p = 0.047). A weak inverse correlation was found between DY and the extent of previous genetic investigation (rho = - 0.323; p = 0.065). The most common genes were CACNA1A and SACS. DY was higher for presumed AR inheritance pattern, positive family history, and parental consanguinity. ES appears more advantageous due to the inclusion of rare genes that might be excluded in TP.

Abstract Image

遗传性共济失调NGS测试的诊断率:一项系统综述。
下一代测序(NGS),包括靶向小组(TP)、外显子组测序(ES)和基因组测序(GS),成为诊断遗传性共济失调(HA)的强大临床工具。确定它们的诊断产量(DY)对于最佳临床决策至关重要。我们对HA NGS测试的DY进行了全面系统的文献综述。我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中搜索了2016年至2022年间的相关研究,并手动检查了相关综述的参考文献列表。符合条件的研究将共济失调患者NGS测试的DY描述为一个显著特征。33项合格研究的数据显示,中位DY为43%(IQR=9.5-100%)。TP和ES的中位DY分别为46%和41.9%。较高的DY与特定的表型选择有关,如发作性共济失调68.35%,早期和晚期共济失调46.4%和54.4%。父母血亲的DY为52.4%(p=0.009),假定的常染色体隐性遗传(AR)遗传模式显示62.5%。进行靶向测序(串联重复扩增,TRE)筛查的研究的DY中位数与未进行筛查的研究之间存在差异(p=0.047)。在DY与先前遗传调查的程度之间发现弱负相关(rho=-0.323;p=0.065)。最常见的基因是CACNA1A和SACS。假定AR遗传模式、阳性家族史和父母血亲的DY较高。ES似乎更有利,因为它包含了可能被排除在TP中的罕见基因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebellum
Cerebellum 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Official publication of the Society for Research on the Cerebellum devoted to genetics of cerebellar ataxias, role of cerebellum in motor control and cognitive function, and amid an ageing population, diseases associated with cerebellar dysfunction. The Cerebellum is a central source for the latest developments in fundamental neurosciences including molecular and cellular biology; behavioural neurosciences and neurochemistry; genetics; fundamental and clinical neurophysiology; neurology and neuropathology; cognition and neuroimaging. The Cerebellum benefits neuroscientists in molecular and cellular biology; neurophysiologists; researchers in neurotransmission; neurologists; radiologists; paediatricians; neuropsychologists; students of neurology and psychiatry and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信