Saliva Collection Methods Among Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Juliette M H Fey, Floris J Bikker, Daniela Hesse
{"title":"Saliva Collection Methods Among Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Juliette M H Fey, Floris J Bikker, Daniela Hesse","doi":"10.1007/s40291-023-00684-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Saliva can be used for screening and diagnostic purposes. Although multiple saliva collection methods are available, their use in children can be limited due to lack of cooperation, developmental stage, and age. The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively appraise the different methods of saliva collection among both children and adolescents by assessing the available scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies on saliva collection methods among children and adolescents were included for this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 249 eligible articles, of which 205 had a cross-sectional study design. Four distinct saliva collection methods have surfaced: the drooling method, the absorption method, the spitting method, and the suction method. Among infants or children under the age of 6 years, the suction and absorption methods were most preferred. The drooling and spitting methods were only applicable among children above the age of 3 years. When children were not willing to cooperate, the absorption method was most feasible. In adolescents and older children, no specific method was found to be preferred over another method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, saliva collection is well tolerated by children and adolescents, with the absorption and suction methods being preferred with young and uncooperative children.</p>","PeriodicalId":49797,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-023-00684-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Saliva can be used for screening and diagnostic purposes. Although multiple saliva collection methods are available, their use in children can be limited due to lack of cooperation, developmental stage, and age. The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively appraise the different methods of saliva collection among both children and adolescents by assessing the available scientific literature.

Methods: A literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies on saliva collection methods among children and adolescents were included for this review.

Results: The literature search identified 249 eligible articles, of which 205 had a cross-sectional study design. Four distinct saliva collection methods have surfaced: the drooling method, the absorption method, the spitting method, and the suction method. Among infants or children under the age of 6 years, the suction and absorption methods were most preferred. The drooling and spitting methods were only applicable among children above the age of 3 years. When children were not willing to cooperate, the absorption method was most feasible. In adolescents and older children, no specific method was found to be preferred over another method.

Conclusion: Overall, saliva collection is well tolerated by children and adolescents, with the absorption and suction methods being preferred with young and uncooperative children.

Abstract Image

儿童和青少年唾液采集方法:范围界定综述。
目的:唾液可用于筛查和诊断目的。尽管有多种唾液采集方法,但由于缺乏合作、发育阶段和年龄,它们在儿童中的使用可能会受到限制。本范围审查的目的是通过评估现有的科学文献,全面评估儿童和青少年唾液采集的不同方法。方法:使用PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库进行文献检索。本综述纳入了关于儿童和青少年唾液收集方法的合格研究。结果:文献检索确定了249篇符合条件的文章,其中205篇为横断面研究设计。四种不同的唾液采集方法浮出水面:流口水法、吸收法、吐口水法和抽吸法。在婴儿或6岁以下的儿童中,抽吸和吸收方法是最优选的。流口水和随地吐痰的方法只适用于3岁以上的儿童。当孩子们不愿意合作时,吸收法是最可行的。在青少年和年龄较大的儿童中,没有发现特定的方法比其他方法更可取。结论:总体而言,儿童和青少年对唾液采集有良好的耐受性,年轻和不合作的儿童更喜欢吸收和抽吸方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy welcomes current opinion articles on emerging or contentious issues, comprehensive narrative reviews, systematic reviews (as outlined by the PRISMA statement), original research articles (including short communications) and letters to the editor. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信