Mark J. Nicolich, John F. Gamble
下载PDF
{"title":"Evidence of a threshold effect for TSP in the Philadelphia data set","authors":"Mark J. Nicolich, John F. Gamble","doi":"10.1002/jem.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of the present paper is to examine the complex set of questions about the PM-mortality exposure–response (E-R) relationship by looking at the practical and demonstrable consequences of time series model building and by considering alternate modelling methods.</p><p>Two questions are posed. The first is how to demonstrate goodness-of-fit for an exposure–response model and the effectiveness of a particular term in the model. The second is how to detect poor model fit associated with unusual relationships in the data, such as thresholds or other non-linear patterns. Suggested solutions are demonstrated using the Philadelphia data set used by Kelsall. These solutions are potentially applicable to other time series data analyses.</p><p>Examination of the example data indicate several findings. First, the addition of the pollution terms to a model which contains temporal and weather variables has a negligible change on the predictive ability of the model. While the statistical criteria are slightly improved the practical improvement in mortality prediction is minimal. Second, for these data, there is demonstrable evidence that there is a threshold effect for total suspended particulate (TSP) on predicted mortality. The threshold is also seen in the gaseous pollutants. Lastly, the inclusion of terms representing the day of the week statistically improves model fit to a greater extent than the pollution terms.</p><p>The results from this exercise suggest that several steps should be added to the traditional analysis and presentation of time-series data. These include visual and tabular presentation of results from each major model and analysis for a threshold at least for the criteria pollutant terms. The presentation elements allow the reader to independently assess model fit and the predictive capabilities of the model. Determination of a threshold allows objective determination of a no adverse effect level. Overall, application of these methods to time-series analyses provides more specificity for testing the predictive power of the model and for protecting health.Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","volume":"1 4","pages":"279-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jem.41","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jem.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to examine the complex set of questions about the PM-mortality exposure–response (E-R) relationship by looking at the practical and demonstrable consequences of time series model building and by considering alternate modelling methods.
Two questions are posed. The first is how to demonstrate goodness-of-fit for an exposure–response model and the effectiveness of a particular term in the model. The second is how to detect poor model fit associated with unusual relationships in the data, such as thresholds or other non-linear patterns. Suggested solutions are demonstrated using the Philadelphia data set used by Kelsall. These solutions are potentially applicable to other time series data analyses.
Examination of the example data indicate several findings. First, the addition of the pollution terms to a model which contains temporal and weather variables has a negligible change on the predictive ability of the model. While the statistical criteria are slightly improved the practical improvement in mortality prediction is minimal. Second, for these data, there is demonstrable evidence that there is a threshold effect for total suspended particulate (TSP) on predicted mortality. The threshold is also seen in the gaseous pollutants. Lastly, the inclusion of terms representing the day of the week statistically improves model fit to a greater extent than the pollution terms.
The results from this exercise suggest that several steps should be added to the traditional analysis and presentation of time-series data. These include visual and tabular presentation of results from each major model and analysis for a threshold at least for the criteria pollutant terms. The presentation elements allow the reader to independently assess model fit and the predictive capabilities of the model. Determination of a threshold allows objective determination of a no adverse effect level. Overall, application of these methods to time-series analyses provides more specificity for testing the predictive power of the model and for protecting health.Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
费城数据集中TSP阈值效应的证据
本文的目的是通过观察时间序列模型构建的实际和可证明的后果,并考虑其他建模方法,来检验PM死亡率暴露-反应(E-R)关系的一系列复杂问题。提出了两个问题。第一个是如何证明暴露-反应模型的拟合优度以及模型中特定术语的有效性。第二个是如何检测与数据中的异常关系(如阈值或其他非线性模式)相关联的较差模型拟合。使用Kelsall使用的Philadelphia数据集演示了建议的解决方案。这些解决方案可能适用于其他时间序列数据分析。对示例数据的检查表明了一些发现。首先,将污染项添加到包含时间和天气变量的模型中,对模型的预测能力的变化可以忽略不计。虽然统计标准略有改进,但死亡率预测的实际改进微乎其微。其次,对于这些数据,有确凿证据表明,总悬浮颗粒物(TSP)对预测死亡率有阈值影响。在气体污染物中也可以看到阈值。最后,包含代表一周中某一天的术语在统计上比污染术语在更大程度上改善了模型拟合。这项工作的结果表明,应该在传统的时间序列数据分析和表示基础上增加几个步骤。其中包括每个主要模型的结果的可视化和表格化表示,以及至少对标准污染物项的阈值的分析。呈现元素允许读者独立地评估模型拟合和模型的预测能力。阈值的确定允许客观地确定无不良影响水平。总的来说,将这些方法应用于时间序列分析为测试模型的预测能力和保护健康提供了更多的特异性。版权所有©1999 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。