Pietro Sartorelli, Franco Carboncini, Francesco Murdaca, Maria T. Novelli, Daniela Orsi, Rossana Mancini
{"title":"Contact sensitization in fruit farmers","authors":"Pietro Sartorelli, Franco Carboncini, Francesco Murdaca, Maria T. Novelli, Daniela Orsi, Rossana Mancini","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199901/03)1:1<51::AID-JEM10>3.0.CO;2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of sensitization and contact dermatitis in a population of Italian farmers and the importance of pesticides as skin sensitizers. Sixty-four female worker (mean age 35) employed in the harvesting of cherries, peaches, olives and grapes were studied. Skin diseases were assessed with a questionnaire and physical examination. The farm workers were patch tested with the GIRDCA standard series containing 30 allergens and six pesticides currently used on the farm. 18 workers (28%) were sensitized to one or more allergens. 36 subjects (52%) were found to be atopic and three (4.7%) had dermatitis of the hands with positive reactions to the GIRDCA standard series. Differences in contact sensitization betweeen atopic and non atopic patients were not statistically significant (χ2 test). One worker had contact urticaria to peaches and 36 farmers (52%) referred to itching and skin rashes in summer, during the harvesting of peaches. Only 18 workers reported that they almost always wore protective clothing. Despite the high frequency of positive patch tests, contact sensitization to pesticides was unusual in our group. No cases of allergic contact dermatitis to pesticides were found and only one patient who was symptomless (1.5%) had an allergic reaction to pesticides (azinphos-methyl). Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":100780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"51-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1301%28199901/03%291%3A1%3C51%3A%3AAID-JEM10%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
果农的接触敏感性
该研究的目的是确定意大利农民群体中致敏和接触性皮炎的流行率,以及杀虫剂作为皮肤致敏剂的重要性。对64名从事樱桃、桃子、橄榄和葡萄收割的女工(平均年龄35岁)进行了研究。通过问卷调查和体格检查对皮肤病进行评估。农场工人使用GIRDCA标准系列进行了贴片测试,该系列包含农场目前使用的30种过敏原和6种杀虫剂。18名工人(28%)对一种或多种过敏原敏感。36名受试者(52%)被发现为特应性,3名受试人(4.7%)患有对GIRDCA标准系列呈阳性反应的手部皮炎。特应性和非特应性患者之间的接触致敏差异无统计学意义(χ2检验)。一名工人对桃子有接触性荨麻疹,36名农民(52%)在夏季收获桃子时出现瘙痒和皮疹。只有18名工人报告说,他们几乎总是穿着防护服。尽管贴片试验呈阳性的频率很高,但在我们组中,对杀虫剂的接触致敏是不寻常的。没有发现对杀虫剂过敏性接触性皮炎的病例,只有一名无症状的患者(1.5%)对杀虫剂(甲基叠氮磷)有过敏反应。版权所有©1999 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。