{"title":"Validación de un cuestionario para evaluar la cultura de seguridad del paciente en directivos de la salud: propiedades psicométricas y usabilidad","authors":"G. Garzón González, L.M. Parra Ramírez","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To validate a reduced and applicable to distinct location version of the only validated questionnaire of patient safety culture in managers in Spanish language.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Questionnaire validation study. Community of Madrid 2022. Reduction/adaptation of the original questionnaire: Giménez-Aibar-Gutiérrez, 2013 Questionnaire was reduced from 85 items to 25; those local or not applicable were removed. Pre-test: Semi-structured survey on comprehension and response scale. There was no need to modify the questionnaire. Validation: It was tested in 39 primary care managers without care activity. Internal consistency (α Cronbach), content validity (experts) and construct validity (factor analysis) were analysed. Usability analysis: Survey on time spent and non-response rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>α Cronbach<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.894. Content validity: Experts deemed questionnaire was complete. Factor analysis: five factors explain 68% of variance. The factors corresponded to the dimensions of the theoretical construct. Factors, internal consistency of each and correlation with global score were: commitment with patient safety: α Cronbach<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.793, <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.778; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001; procedures/reporting: α Cronbach<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.83, <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.806; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001; attitudes with patient safety: α Cronbach<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.766, <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.596; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001; clinicians involving: α Cronbach<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.773, <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.798; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001; patient safety communication: α Cronbach<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.615, <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.518; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.001; usability survey: 95% thought spent time was adequate. Non-response rate was 0%, except one item.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this work, a reduced and adapted version of questionnaire of Giménez-Aibar-Gutiérrez was validated at distinct location (Madrid region). Psychometric properties and usability, which were found, suggest that the reduced questionnaire is a reliable, valid and usable instrument to assess patient safety culture in managers of any place.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To validate a reduced and applicable to distinct location version of the only validated questionnaire of patient safety culture in managers in Spanish language.
Method
Questionnaire validation study. Community of Madrid 2022. Reduction/adaptation of the original questionnaire: Giménez-Aibar-Gutiérrez, 2013 Questionnaire was reduced from 85 items to 25; those local or not applicable were removed. Pre-test: Semi-structured survey on comprehension and response scale. There was no need to modify the questionnaire. Validation: It was tested in 39 primary care managers without care activity. Internal consistency (α Cronbach), content validity (experts) and construct validity (factor analysis) were analysed. Usability analysis: Survey on time spent and non-response rate.
Results
α Cronbach = 0.894. Content validity: Experts deemed questionnaire was complete. Factor analysis: five factors explain 68% of variance. The factors corresponded to the dimensions of the theoretical construct. Factors, internal consistency of each and correlation with global score were: commitment with patient safety: α Cronbach = 0.793, r = 0.778; P < .001; procedures/reporting: α Cronbach = 0.83, r = 0.806; P < .001; attitudes with patient safety: α Cronbach = 0.766, r = 0.596; P < .001; clinicians involving: α Cronbach = 0.773, r = 0.798; P < .001; patient safety communication: α Cronbach = 0.615, r = 0.518; P = .001; usability survey: 95% thought spent time was adequate. Non-response rate was 0%, except one item.
Conclusion
In this work, a reduced and adapted version of questionnaire of Giménez-Aibar-Gutiérrez was validated at distinct location (Madrid region). Psychometric properties and usability, which were found, suggest that the reduced questionnaire is a reliable, valid and usable instrument to assess patient safety culture in managers of any place.
期刊介绍:
Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)