Do collaborations enhance the high-quality output of scientific institutions? Evidence from the Italian Research Assessment Exercise

Maria Rosaria Carillo , Erasmo Papagni , Alessandro Sapio
{"title":"Do collaborations enhance the high-quality output of scientific institutions? Evidence from the Italian Research Assessment Exercise","authors":"Maria Rosaria Carillo ,&nbsp;Erasmo Papagni ,&nbsp;Alessandro Sapio","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we analyze the effects of research collaborations on the scientific output of academic institutions, drawing on data from the first official Italian research assessment exercise. We measure the scientific performance of a research unit as the number of publications that received an excellent grade in the evaluation process. Different aspects of scientific collaboration are taken into account, such as the degree of openness of a research team towards other institutions and/or countries, the frequency of co-authorships, and the average size of co-authoring teams. Using econometric models for count data, we find that greater and more frequent knowledge exchange resulting from collaboration with external or foreign colleagues increase researchers’ productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88732,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of socio-economics","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.005","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of socio-economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053535713001200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the effects of research collaborations on the scientific output of academic institutions, drawing on data from the first official Italian research assessment exercise. We measure the scientific performance of a research unit as the number of publications that received an excellent grade in the evaluation process. Different aspects of scientific collaboration are taken into account, such as the degree of openness of a research team towards other institutions and/or countries, the frequency of co-authorships, and the average size of co-authoring teams. Using econometric models for count data, we find that greater and more frequent knowledge exchange resulting from collaboration with external or foreign colleagues increase researchers’ productivity.

合作是否能提高科学机构的高质量产出?意大利研究评估活动的证据
在本文中,我们利用意大利第一次官方研究评估活动的数据,分析了研究合作对学术机构科学产出的影响。我们衡量一个研究单位的科学表现是指在评估过程中获得优异成绩的出版物数量。科学合作的不同方面都被考虑在内,例如研究团队对其他机构和/或国家的开放程度、共同作者的频率以及共同作者团队的平均规模。使用计数数据的计量经济模型,我们发现与外部或外国同事合作产生的更大、更频繁的知识交流提高了研究人员的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信