Effet des orthèses de pied sur les schémas et la variabilité du couplage de l'articulation de l'arrière-pied et du tibia

R. Ferber , I. McClay Davis , D.-S. Williams
{"title":"Effet des orthèses de pied sur les schémas et la variabilité du couplage de l'articulation de l'arrière-pied et du tibia","authors":"R. Ferber ,&nbsp;I. McClay Davis ,&nbsp;D.-S. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.emcpol.2005.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to compare joint coupling patterns and variability of the rearfoot and tibia during running in subjects who were treated with two types of orthotic devices to that of controls. Eleven subjects with various lower extremity injuries were treated unsuccessfully with a standard orthotic, and then successfully with an inverted orthotic. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected while subjects ran without orthoses and then in standard and inverted orthoses. Eleven healthy subjects ran without orthoses for comparison. The rearfoot inversion/eversion and tibial internal/external rotation joint coupling pattern and variability relationship was assessed using a vector coding technique. It was hypothesized that when the treated runners ran without orthotic devices, they would exhibit lower joint coupling angles and lower joint coupling variability compared to the controls. In addition, it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in the coupling angle or coupling variability between the standard and no orthotic conditions of the treated runners. Finally, it was hypothesized that coupling angle would decrease and variability would increase in the inverted versus the standard and non-orthotic conditions. No significant differences in joint coupling pattern or variability were observed between the treated and control subjects. In addition, no significant differences were noted between the orthotic conditions in the treated group. These results suggest that foot orthotic devices do not produce significant changes in rearfoot–tibial coupling. Therefore, the relief experienced with the inverted orthotic is likely due to factors other than alterations in this coupling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100444,"journal":{"name":"EMC - Podologie","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.emcpol.2005.06.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMC - Podologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1769686005000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare joint coupling patterns and variability of the rearfoot and tibia during running in subjects who were treated with two types of orthotic devices to that of controls. Eleven subjects with various lower extremity injuries were treated unsuccessfully with a standard orthotic, and then successfully with an inverted orthotic. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected while subjects ran without orthoses and then in standard and inverted orthoses. Eleven healthy subjects ran without orthoses for comparison. The rearfoot inversion/eversion and tibial internal/external rotation joint coupling pattern and variability relationship was assessed using a vector coding technique. It was hypothesized that when the treated runners ran without orthotic devices, they would exhibit lower joint coupling angles and lower joint coupling variability compared to the controls. In addition, it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in the coupling angle or coupling variability between the standard and no orthotic conditions of the treated runners. Finally, it was hypothesized that coupling angle would decrease and variability would increase in the inverted versus the standard and non-orthotic conditions. No significant differences in joint coupling pattern or variability were observed between the treated and control subjects. In addition, no significant differences were noted between the orthotic conditions in the treated group. These results suggest that foot orthotic devices do not produce significant changes in rearfoot–tibial coupling. Therefore, the relief experienced with the inverted orthotic is likely due to factors other than alterations in this coupling.

足部矫形器对后脚和胫骨关节耦合模式和变异性的影响
本研究的目的是比较接受两种类型矫形器治疗的受试者与对照组在跑步过程中的关节耦合模式以及后脚和胫骨的变异性。11名患有各种下肢损伤的受试者使用标准矫形器治疗失败,然后使用倒置矫形器成功。当受试者在没有矫形器的情况下跑步,然后在标准矫形器和倒置矫形器中跑步时,收集三维运动学数据。11名健康受试者在没有矫形器的情况下跑步进行比较。使用矢量编码技术评估后足内翻/外翻和胫骨内/外旋转关节耦合模式和变异性关系。据推测,当接受治疗的跑步者在没有矫形器的情况下跑步时,与对照组相比,他们将表现出较低的关节耦合角和较低的接头耦合可变性。此外,据推测,在接受治疗的跑步者的标准和无矫正条件之间,耦合角度或耦合可变性不会有差异。最后,假设与标准和非矫正条件相比,反向条件下的耦合角会减小,变异性会增加。在接受治疗的受试者和对照受试者之间,没有观察到关节耦合模式或变异性的显著差异。此外,治疗组矫正条件之间没有显著差异。这些结果表明,足部矫形器不会对后足-胫骨耦合产生显著变化。因此,倒置矫正器的缓解可能是由于这种耦合变化以外的其他因素造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信