Comparing repertory grids to integrate knowledge from multiple statisticians

Gerda M van den Berg, Willem J Heiser, Jacques J.F Commandeur
{"title":"Comparing repertory grids to integrate knowledge from multiple statisticians","authors":"Gerda M van den Berg,&nbsp;Willem J Heiser,&nbsp;Jacques J.F Commandeur","doi":"10.1016/1042-8143(92)90018-V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When acquiring knowledge from multiple experts, one has to be aware of the fact that differences of opinion among them may exist. A procedure has been devised that allows for a structured comparison of ideas of multiple experts. Perceived similarities and dissimilarities between statistical analysis methods have been elicited using a card-sorting technique based on the Repertory Grid. Both the elements to be judged and the constructs generated could be chosen freely by each individual expert. Grids were compared by transforming them through principal components analyses into configurations. These configurations have been matched using Procrustes analysis and dimension weighting. This analysis procedure uncovers systematic differences in perceptions, that would otherwise have gone unnoticed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100857,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Acquisition","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 259-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1042-8143(92)90018-V","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/104281439290018V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When acquiring knowledge from multiple experts, one has to be aware of the fact that differences of opinion among them may exist. A procedure has been devised that allows for a structured comparison of ideas of multiple experts. Perceived similarities and dissimilarities between statistical analysis methods have been elicited using a card-sorting technique based on the Repertory Grid. Both the elements to be judged and the constructs generated could be chosen freely by each individual expert. Grids were compared by transforming them through principal components analyses into configurations. These configurations have been matched using Procrustes analysis and dimension weighting. This analysis procedure uncovers systematic differences in perceptions, that would otherwise have gone unnoticed.

比较储备网格以整合来自多个统计学家的知识
当从多位专家那里获得知识时,必须意识到他们之间可能存在意见分歧。已经设计了一种程序,可以对多位专家的想法进行结构化比较。使用基于汇编网格的卡片排序技术,可以得出统计分析方法之间的相似性和不相似性。要判断的元素和生成的结构都可以由每个专家自由选择。通过主成分分析将网格转换为配置,对网格进行了比较。这些配置已经使用Procrustes分析和维度加权进行了匹配。这种分析程序揭示了认知上的系统性差异,否则这些差异就会被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信