Towards an analysis and classification of approaches to knowledge acquisition from examination of textual metaphor

Mary A Meyer, Ray C Paton
{"title":"Towards an analysis and classification of approaches to knowledge acquisition from examination of textual metaphor","authors":"Mary A Meyer,&nbsp;Ray C Paton","doi":"10.1016/1042-8143(92)90022-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metaphor is frequently used to describe the abstract aspects of science in scientific fields. Authors' choice of mataphor reflects and affects their thoughts, and through these, their practices in the field. For this reason, we propose that metaphors are appropriate to understanding approaches to knowledge acquisition. Salmond, an anthropologist, provides a methodological model of how metaphor in text can be manually analysed and used to classify the text according to its perspective on the phenomena of study. She picks anthropological references for her application of the method. We expand upon Salmond's method of metaphorical analysis and apply it to key concepts, such as the nature of knowledge, in: (1) text on knowledge acquisition; and (2) text on ethnomethodology, a sociological approach which has recently been applied to knowledge acquisition. For instance, the knowledge acquistion text was found to claim that knowledge is a human construction/tool, while the enthnomethodology text communicated that knowledge is rooted in social activity. We discuss and compare the results of our metaphoric analyses of the knowledge acquistion and ethnomethodology text, as well as those from Salmond's analyses of the anthropological text. We develop Salmond's ideas for classifying approaches and propose a three-part classification scheme: task-, concept- and domain-based. The perspective and application of each classification type are described. We illustrate how to use this classification scheme by classifying the enthnomethodology approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100857,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Acquisition","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 347-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1042-8143(92)90022-S","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/104281439290022S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Metaphor is frequently used to describe the abstract aspects of science in scientific fields. Authors' choice of mataphor reflects and affects their thoughts, and through these, their practices in the field. For this reason, we propose that metaphors are appropriate to understanding approaches to knowledge acquisition. Salmond, an anthropologist, provides a methodological model of how metaphor in text can be manually analysed and used to classify the text according to its perspective on the phenomena of study. She picks anthropological references for her application of the method. We expand upon Salmond's method of metaphorical analysis and apply it to key concepts, such as the nature of knowledge, in: (1) text on knowledge acquisition; and (2) text on ethnomethodology, a sociological approach which has recently been applied to knowledge acquisition. For instance, the knowledge acquistion text was found to claim that knowledge is a human construction/tool, while the enthnomethodology text communicated that knowledge is rooted in social activity. We discuss and compare the results of our metaphoric analyses of the knowledge acquistion and ethnomethodology text, as well as those from Salmond's analyses of the anthropological text. We develop Salmond's ideas for classifying approaches and propose a three-part classification scheme: task-, concept- and domain-based. The perspective and application of each classification type are described. We illustrate how to use this classification scheme by classifying the enthnomethodology approach.

从语篇隐喻看知识获取方法的分析与分类
隐喻经常被用来描述科学领域中科学的抽象方面。作者对mataphor的选择反映并影响了他们的思想,并通过这些思想影响了他们在该领域的实践。因此,我们提出隐喻适用于理解知识获取的方法。人类学家萨蒙德提供了一个方法论模型,说明如何手动分析文本中的隐喻,并根据其对研究现象的看法对文本进行分类。她选择人类学的参考资料来应用这种方法。我们对萨蒙德的隐喻分析方法进行了扩展,并将其应用于关键概念,如知识的本质:(1)关于知识获取的文本;(2)关于民族方法论的文本,这是一种最近被应用于知识获取的社会学方法。例如,知识获取文本被发现声称知识是人类的结构/工具,而热情方法论文本传达了知识植根于社会活动。我们讨论并比较了我们对知识获取和民族方法论文本的隐喻分析结果,以及萨蒙德对人类学文本的分析结果。我们发展了Salmond的分类方法思想,并提出了一个由三部分组成的分类方案:基于任务、基于概念和基于领域。描述了每种分类类型的前景和应用。我们通过对推理方法进行分类来说明如何使用这种分类方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信