Using the sectoral and statistical demand to availability index to assess freshwater scarcity risk and effect of water resource management

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shinjiro Yano , Masahiro Yamaguchi , Eiji Yokoi , Takuhiro Kanayama , Akihiro Kubota , Daikichi Ogawada , Akiko Matsumura , Martin Gomez-Garcia , Raymond Valiant Ruritan , Taikan Oki
{"title":"Using the sectoral and statistical demand to availability index to assess freshwater scarcity risk and effect of water resource management","authors":"Shinjiro Yano ,&nbsp;Masahiro Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Eiji Yokoi ,&nbsp;Takuhiro Kanayama ,&nbsp;Akihiro Kubota ,&nbsp;Daikichi Ogawada ,&nbsp;Akiko Matsumura ,&nbsp;Martin Gomez-Garcia ,&nbsp;Raymond Valiant Ruritan ,&nbsp;Taikan Oki","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A more objective assessment of the freshwater scarcity risk at a watershed basis scale contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in which water plays a key role in issues like safe and affordable drinking water, water-related disasters, forest management, biodiversity and ecosystems. Within the SDGs, water scarcity is assessed primarily by using the ratio of withdrawal to availability (WTA). This index has been developed to evaluate the average annual conditions on a broad scale, such as country or large basin. However, there are insufficient cases for assessing specific and detailed risk conditions by using this original WTA concept, due to seasonal and interannual variations of the river discharge and withdrawal volumes. For example, infrastructure (e.g. large dams) and its operation, can drastically change the available water and demand volumes at temporal scales finer than annual. Because recently many daily and monthly records of river discharge and water use have become publicly available, it is possible to conduct water scarcity risk assessments on a monthly basis. By employing these datasets, in this study, we propose to compare volumes of available water and demand by using a Sectoral and Statistical Demand to Availability (SS-DTA) index. The novelty of this index is marked not only by the use of monthly volumes of available and required water but also by how environmental water requirements are included and the statistical relevance of the evaluation. Usually, to determine the available water resources, existing methods deduct from the river discharge the volumes that are required to preserve the surrounding ecosystems. Our proposed method considers the environmental flow requirements as one of the water-demand sectors allowing a simultaneous evaluation of water use that is not possible with existing methods. We applied this method to three representative river basins, two located in Japan (the Tone and the Arakawa River basins) and the Brantas River basin in Indonesia. The results showed the variations of water scarcity risk level through the river operation in each river basin. In the Tone River basin, it was succeeded in a drought year to decrease its risk level from 1 to 0, and to transport sufficient volume of water to the Arakawa River basin through an artificial channel to meet the demands at the same time. In the Brantas River basin, the river operation changed the SS-DTA score from 3 to 2, which means the water scarcity risk level was alleviated, while the main impact of the operation was found in high-water season to decrease the flood risk. Because the number, type, and priority of water demands can be adjusted based on the local situation and all the timeseries data of each demand sector are visualized in parallel, the result includes not only the whole risk level of the river basin but also the practical and specific degree of the risk with demand sector information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100058","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915520300092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A more objective assessment of the freshwater scarcity risk at a watershed basis scale contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in which water plays a key role in issues like safe and affordable drinking water, water-related disasters, forest management, biodiversity and ecosystems. Within the SDGs, water scarcity is assessed primarily by using the ratio of withdrawal to availability (WTA). This index has been developed to evaluate the average annual conditions on a broad scale, such as country or large basin. However, there are insufficient cases for assessing specific and detailed risk conditions by using this original WTA concept, due to seasonal and interannual variations of the river discharge and withdrawal volumes. For example, infrastructure (e.g. large dams) and its operation, can drastically change the available water and demand volumes at temporal scales finer than annual. Because recently many daily and monthly records of river discharge and water use have become publicly available, it is possible to conduct water scarcity risk assessments on a monthly basis. By employing these datasets, in this study, we propose to compare volumes of available water and demand by using a Sectoral and Statistical Demand to Availability (SS-DTA) index. The novelty of this index is marked not only by the use of monthly volumes of available and required water but also by how environmental water requirements are included and the statistical relevance of the evaluation. Usually, to determine the available water resources, existing methods deduct from the river discharge the volumes that are required to preserve the surrounding ecosystems. Our proposed method considers the environmental flow requirements as one of the water-demand sectors allowing a simultaneous evaluation of water use that is not possible with existing methods. We applied this method to three representative river basins, two located in Japan (the Tone and the Arakawa River basins) and the Brantas River basin in Indonesia. The results showed the variations of water scarcity risk level through the river operation in each river basin. In the Tone River basin, it was succeeded in a drought year to decrease its risk level from 1 to 0, and to transport sufficient volume of water to the Arakawa River basin through an artificial channel to meet the demands at the same time. In the Brantas River basin, the river operation changed the SS-DTA score from 3 to 2, which means the water scarcity risk level was alleviated, while the main impact of the operation was found in high-water season to decrease the flood risk. Because the number, type, and priority of water demands can be adjusted based on the local situation and all the timeseries data of each demand sector are visualized in parallel, the result includes not only the whole risk level of the river basin but also the practical and specific degree of the risk with demand sector information.

利用部门和统计需求与可用性指数评估淡水短缺风险和水资源管理效果
在流域范围内对淡水短缺风险进行更客观的评估有助于实现可持续发展目标,在可持续发展目标中,水在安全和负担得起的饮用水、与水有关的灾害、森林管理、生物多样性和生态系统等问题上发挥着关键作用。在可持续发展目标中,水资源短缺主要通过提取与可用性的比率(WTA)进行评估。该指数用于评估国家或大流域等大范围的年平均状况。然而,由于河流流量和抽水量的季节性和年际变化,使用这一原始WTA概念来评估具体和详细的风险条件的案例不足。例如,基础设施(如大型水坝)及其运行可以在比每年更精细的时间尺度上大幅改变可用水量和需求量。由于最近公布了许多河流流量和用水的每日和每月记录,因此可以每月进行缺水风险评估。通过使用这些数据集,在本研究中,我们建议使用部门和统计需求与可用性(SS-DTA)指数来比较可用水量和需求量。该指数的新颖性不仅体现在每月可用水量和所需水量的使用上,还体现在如何包括环境用水需求以及评估的统计相关性上。通常,为了确定可用的水资源,现有的方法从河流流量中扣除保护周围生态系统所需的水量。我们提出的方法将环境流量要求视为用水需求部门之一,允许同时评估现有方法无法实现的用水情况。我们将该方法应用于三个具有代表性的河流流域,其中两个位于日本(通河和荒川河流域)和印度尼西亚的布兰塔斯河流域。结果表明,各流域的缺水风险水平随河流运行的变化而变化。在通河流域,在干旱年份成功地将其风险水平从1降低到0,并通过人工渠道向荒川河流域输送了足够的水量,以满足需求。在Brantas河流域,河流运行将SS-DTA评分从3分变为2分,这意味着缺水风险水平得到了缓解,而运行的主要影响是在高汛期,以降低洪水风险。由于用水需求的数量、类型和优先级可以根据当地情况进行调整,并且每个需求部门的所有时间序列数据都是并行可视化的,因此结果不仅包括流域的整体风险水平,还包括需求部门信息的实际和具体风险程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信