Operator effects in the choice of certainty factor algebras: an experimental study

Clyde W. Holsapple, William S. Rayens, Jen-Her Wu
{"title":"Operator effects in the choice of certainty factor algebras: an experimental study","authors":"Clyde W. Holsapple,&nbsp;William S. Rayens,&nbsp;Jen-Her Wu","doi":"10.1006/knac.1993.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One aspect of knowledge acquisition involves reaching an understanding of how an expert combines certainties in the course of reasoning. There are several distinct junctures in an inference process where certainties need to be combined. At the most elemental level, these include combining certainties of operands involved in the arithmetic, logical and relational expressions that can constitute a premise. As a basic frame of reference for acquiring knowledge about certainty treatments, there is a prescriptive mapping of operators into the joint and confirmative classes of certainty factor algebras. However, these prescriptions have not been empirically studied. Here, we report on an experiment conducted to test various hypotheses about actual behaviors of people in combining certainties for elemental operators. For each operator, we found behaviors to be consistent with prescriptions in some respects, but deviating from them in other respects. The result is an empirical base from which to launch efforts involving the acquisition of knowledge about how specific experts combine certainties at various junctures in inference processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100857,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Acquisition","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 385-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/knac.1993.1014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042814383710149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One aspect of knowledge acquisition involves reaching an understanding of how an expert combines certainties in the course of reasoning. There are several distinct junctures in an inference process where certainties need to be combined. At the most elemental level, these include combining certainties of operands involved in the arithmetic, logical and relational expressions that can constitute a premise. As a basic frame of reference for acquiring knowledge about certainty treatments, there is a prescriptive mapping of operators into the joint and confirmative classes of certainty factor algebras. However, these prescriptions have not been empirically studied. Here, we report on an experiment conducted to test various hypotheses about actual behaviors of people in combining certainties for elemental operators. For each operator, we found behaviors to be consistent with prescriptions in some respects, but deviating from them in other respects. The result is an empirical base from which to launch efforts involving the acquisition of knowledge about how specific experts combine certainties at various junctures in inference processes.

确定性因子代数选择中的算子效应的实验研究
知识获取的一个方面是理解专家如何在推理过程中结合确定性。在推理过程中,有几个不同的转折点需要结合确定性。在最基本的层面上,这些包括组合算术、逻辑和关系表达式中涉及的操作数的确定性,这些操作数可以构成前提。作为获得确定性处理知识的基本参考框架,存在算子到确定性因子代数的联合类和确定性类的规定映射。然而,这些处方尚未进行实证研究。在这里,我们报道了一项实验,该实验旨在测试关于人们在组合元素运算符的确定性时的实际行为的各种假设。对于每个操作员,我们发现行为在某些方面与处方一致,但在其他方面与处方不同。其结果是一个经验基础,从中开始努力获取关于特定专家如何在推理过程的各个关键时刻结合确定性的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信