Retos e iniciativas en la prevención de las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria: estudio de consenso de expertos

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
S. Tomás-Vecina , M.J. Reyes-Ramos , Grupo de Expertos Infection-Hub
{"title":"Retos e iniciativas en la prevención de las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria: estudio de consenso de expertos","authors":"S. Tomás-Vecina ,&nbsp;M.J. Reyes-Ramos ,&nbsp;Grupo de Expertos Infection-Hub","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the project was to identify new strategies, agreed upon by experts, that help reduce the prevalence of Health Care Related Infections (HAIs) given the increase in their prevalence as a result of the pandemic and improve patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The project was developed in three phases. The first two are framed in a sequential explanatory mixed model. Phase 1 consisted of a quantitative study (anonymous survey) to find out the perception of healthcare professionals about HAIs, risk factors, preventive measures, protocols, disinfection products and approaches. Phase 2 consisted of a qualitative exploratory study in which a panel of 15 experts analyzed the results, using focus group techniques, integrating both phases through the elaboration of metainferences. Phase 3 consisted of a qualitative descriptive study where, through nominal group techniques, agreed proposals for strategies to prevent HAIs were prepared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The panel of experts defined a total of 51 proposals for new strategies: 15 in hand hygiene, 13 in surface cleaning, 13 in the use of devices, and 10 in HAI prevention training. Of all of them, 13 were agreed upon as preferable (medium-high viability and high impact) and 7 as recommendable (low viability and high impact).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the prevention of HAIs, experts recommend applying different strategies simultaneously, which include innovative, technological and humanization aspects, both in data collection, intervention and training, prioritizing those with the greatest impact. and feasibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of the project was to identify new strategies, agreed upon by experts, that help reduce the prevalence of Health Care Related Infections (HAIs) given the increase in their prevalence as a result of the pandemic and improve patient safety.

Material and methods

The project was developed in three phases. The first two are framed in a sequential explanatory mixed model. Phase 1 consisted of a quantitative study (anonymous survey) to find out the perception of healthcare professionals about HAIs, risk factors, preventive measures, protocols, disinfection products and approaches. Phase 2 consisted of a qualitative exploratory study in which a panel of 15 experts analyzed the results, using focus group techniques, integrating both phases through the elaboration of metainferences. Phase 3 consisted of a qualitative descriptive study where, through nominal group techniques, agreed proposals for strategies to prevent HAIs were prepared.

Results

The panel of experts defined a total of 51 proposals for new strategies: 15 in hand hygiene, 13 in surface cleaning, 13 in the use of devices, and 10 in HAI prevention training. Of all of them, 13 were agreed upon as preferable (medium-high viability and high impact) and 7 as recommendable (low viability and high impact).

Conclusions

In the prevention of HAIs, experts recommend applying different strategies simultaneously, which include innovative, technological and humanization aspects, both in data collection, intervention and training, prioritizing those with the greatest impact. and feasibility.

预防与卫生保健有关的感染的挑战和倡议:专家共识研究
引言该项目的目标是确定经专家同意的新策略,以帮助降低医疗保健相关感染(HAI)的流行率,并提高患者的安全性。材料和方法该项目分三个阶段开发。前两个是在一个顺序解释混合模型中构建的。第一阶段包括一项定量研究(匿名调查),以了解医疗保健专业人员对HAI、风险因素、预防措施、方案、消毒产品和方法的看法。第二阶段是一项定性探索性研究,由15名专家组成的小组使用焦点小组技术分析了结果,通过阐述元推理将两个阶段结合起来。第3阶段包括一项定性描述性研究,通过名义小组技术,制定了预防HAI的商定策略建议。结果专家组共确定了51项新策略建议:手部卫生15项,表面清洁13项,器械使用13项,HAI预防培训10项。结论在HAI的预防中,专家建议同时采用不同的策略,包括数据收集、干预和培训方面的创新、技术和人性化,优先考虑那些影响最大的人。以及可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信