A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives

Pedro H.S. Brancalion , Letícia C. Garcia , Rafael Loyola , Ricardo R. Rodrigues , Valério D. Pillar , Thomas M. Lewinsohn
{"title":"A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives","authors":"Pedro H.S. Brancalion ,&nbsp;Letícia C. Garcia ,&nbsp;Rafael Loyola ,&nbsp;Ricardo R. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Valério D. Pillar ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Lewinsohn","doi":"10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil, which replaced the Forest Code from 1965, is still undergoing regulation at federal and state levels, and the constitutionality of some clauses are still in question. In order to support legal rulings, decisions by public officers, and to inform other stakeholders, we present a balanced assessment of the positive and negative consequences of Native Vegetation Protection Law in light of current scientific knowledge. Key advances were noted in the systems of controls and incentives, which promoted new mechanisms and policies to support the implementation of this law. The main environmental setbacks were (i) the removal of protection of certain environmentally fragile areas, (ii) the concession of amnesty of fines incurred for violating the preceding legislation, (iii) allowing continuous farming or maintenance of infrastructure in areas protected by law, without full recovery of native vegetation. The weakening of Native Vegetation Protection Law may hamper soil and watershed protection, biodiversity conservation, and even agricultural productivity, without manifest benefits for the country. On that account, we recommend that: (i) judiciary rulings and state and county regulations to correct pending issues with the Native Vegetation Protection Law based on scientific knowledge and with wider citizen participation; (ii) the strengthening of agencies for rural technical assistance; (iii) the development of incentives to develop the supply chain for native vegetation recovery; (iv) the regulation of compensation for Legal Reserves based on clear and robust environmental criteria; and (v) the assessment of legal compliance has also to be based on the environmental quality of recovered areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49776,"journal":{"name":"Natureza & Conservacao","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.003","citationCount":"227","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natureza & Conservacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1679007316300020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 227

Abstract

The Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil, which replaced the Forest Code from 1965, is still undergoing regulation at federal and state levels, and the constitutionality of some clauses are still in question. In order to support legal rulings, decisions by public officers, and to inform other stakeholders, we present a balanced assessment of the positive and negative consequences of Native Vegetation Protection Law in light of current scientific knowledge. Key advances were noted in the systems of controls and incentives, which promoted new mechanisms and policies to support the implementation of this law. The main environmental setbacks were (i) the removal of protection of certain environmentally fragile areas, (ii) the concession of amnesty of fines incurred for violating the preceding legislation, (iii) allowing continuous farming or maintenance of infrastructure in areas protected by law, without full recovery of native vegetation. The weakening of Native Vegetation Protection Law may hamper soil and watershed protection, biodiversity conservation, and even agricultural productivity, without manifest benefits for the country. On that account, we recommend that: (i) judiciary rulings and state and county regulations to correct pending issues with the Native Vegetation Protection Law based on scientific knowledge and with wider citizen participation; (ii) the strengthening of agencies for rural technical assistance; (iii) the development of incentives to develop the supply chain for native vegetation recovery; (iv) the regulation of compensation for Legal Reserves based on clear and robust environmental criteria; and (v) the assessment of legal compliance has also to be based on the environmental quality of recovered areas.

对《巴西本土植被保护法》(2012年)的批判性分析:更新和正在进行的举措
从1965年起取代《森林法》的《巴西本土植被保护法》仍在联邦和州一级进行监管,一些条款的合宪性仍存在疑问。为了支持法律裁决、公职人员的决定,并告知其他利益相关者,我们根据当前的科学知识,对《原生植被保护法》的积极和消极后果进行了平衡评估。注意到在控制和激励制度方面取得了重大进展,促进了新的机制和政策,以支持该法律的实施。主要的环境挫折是:(i)取消了对某些环境脆弱地区的保护,(ii)对违反先前立法而被罚款的特赦,(iii)允许在法律保护区内继续耕种或维护基础设施,而不完全恢复原生植被。《原生植被保护法》的削弱可能会阻碍土壤和流域保护、生物多样性保护,甚至农业生产力,对国家没有明显的好处。为此,我们建议:(i)司法裁决和州和县法规,以科学知识和更广泛的公民参与为基础,纠正《原生植被保护法》中悬而未决的问题;二加强农村技术援助机构;(iii)制定激励措施,以发展原生植被恢复的供应链;(iv)基于明确而有力的环境标准对法定储备金的补偿进行监管;以及(v)法律合规性的评估也必须以恢复地区的环境质量为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natureza & Conservacao
Natureza & Conservacao 环境科学-生物多样性保护
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信