Lufthansa Express Rail in Germany: A critical evaluation of benefits and limitations of the intermodal network based on journey time and fares

Sebastian Wandelt, Xiaoqian Sun
{"title":"Lufthansa Express Rail in Germany: A critical evaluation of benefits and limitations of the intermodal network based on journey time and fares","authors":"Sebastian Wandelt,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2022.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Frankfurt Airport is a role model for intermodal infrastructure, given its excellent degree of air, rail, and road connectivity. The connection Cologne-Frankfurt, for instance, is frequently used as the prime example for air-rail mode substitution, where a high-frequent rail service from Cologne Main Station to the integrated air-rail terminal at Frankfurt Airport completely replaced air service between the two cities in the year 2007. In recent years, Lufthansa and Deutsche Bahn have gradually expanded this role model into a whole network product covering 24 cities connected for Frankfurt Airport, advertised as Lufthansa Express Rail. In this study, we analyze the potential benefits of Lufthansa Express Rail for the 24 cities in terms of journey time and journey fare, comparing it to flights departing from the 24 origin cities directly. Our results indicate that the network and schedule together do not lead to obvious advantages for either time-sensitive or price-sensitive passengers, compared to the prime example Cologne-Frankfurt. Our study contributes to the analysis of air-rail integration, highlighting the difficulties which are inherent when extending a prime example corridor into a working network product.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277258632200048X/pdfft?md5=2b78824a9034118016a5363aa6eaa4f7&pid=1-s2.0-S277258632200048X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277258632200048X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frankfurt Airport is a role model for intermodal infrastructure, given its excellent degree of air, rail, and road connectivity. The connection Cologne-Frankfurt, for instance, is frequently used as the prime example for air-rail mode substitution, where a high-frequent rail service from Cologne Main Station to the integrated air-rail terminal at Frankfurt Airport completely replaced air service between the two cities in the year 2007. In recent years, Lufthansa and Deutsche Bahn have gradually expanded this role model into a whole network product covering 24 cities connected for Frankfurt Airport, advertised as Lufthansa Express Rail. In this study, we analyze the potential benefits of Lufthansa Express Rail for the 24 cities in terms of journey time and journey fare, comparing it to flights departing from the 24 origin cities directly. Our results indicate that the network and schedule together do not lead to obvious advantages for either time-sensitive or price-sensitive passengers, compared to the prime example Cologne-Frankfurt. Our study contributes to the analysis of air-rail integration, highlighting the difficulties which are inherent when extending a prime example corridor into a working network product.

德国汉莎航空快线:基于行程时间和票价的多式联运网络效益和局限性的批判性评估
法兰克福机场是多式联运基础设施的典范,因为它具有良好的航空、铁路和公路连通性。例如,连接科隆-法兰克福经常被用作空铁模式替代的主要例子,从科隆火车总站到法兰克福机场综合空铁总站的高频率铁路服务在2007年完全取代了两个城市之间的航空服务。近年来,汉莎航空和德国铁路已将这一榜样逐步扩展为覆盖法兰克福机场24个城市的全网络产品,广告名为汉莎快铁。在这项研究中,我们分析了汉莎快速铁路在行程时间和票价方面对24个城市的潜在好处,并将其与直接从24个始发城市起飞的航班进行了比较。我们的结果表明,与科隆-法兰克福的主要例子相比,网络和时间表加在一起对时间敏感或价格敏感的乘客都没有带来明显的优势。我们的研究有助于分析空铁一体化,强调了将一个主要示例走廊扩展为一个工作网络产品时所固有的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信