Comparación de la prevalencia de adenomas detectados mediante colonoscopio con «CAP» accesorio (endocuff) versus colonoscopio estándar

Pilar Anabel Peniche Moguel, Ángel Mario Zarate Guzmán, Víctor García Guerrero, Adalbeto Corral Medina, Rosario Valdes Lias
{"title":"Comparación de la prevalencia de adenomas detectados mediante colonoscopio con «CAP» accesorio (endocuff) versus colonoscopio estándar","authors":"Pilar Anabel Peniche Moguel,&nbsp;Ángel Mario Zarate Guzmán,&nbsp;Víctor García Guerrero,&nbsp;Adalbeto Corral Medina,&nbsp;Rosario Valdes Lias","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2016.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>CAP-assisted colonoscopy (CAP) is a simple technique where use is made of plastic cylinder placed at the tip of the colonoscope. This plastic cylinder has extensions that can separate the colonic folds and enhance the field of observation, thus permitting the inspection of difficult to evaluate areas. Studies have been conducted to assess the effect of the CAP assisted colonoscopy in detecting polyps, with conflicting results.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the number of polyps detected by CAP-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional, comparative, randomized, experimental trial was conducted on patients that were randomised into 2 groups using a random numbers table. Group A was to standard colonoscopy, and the B group to CAP-assisted colonoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 147 patients were included, of which 2 were excluded because their work-up was incomplete. The remaining 145 patients, of whom 66.2% (96) were women and 33.8% (49) were men, were randomised into 2 groups. The mean age was 52.68 ±14.08 years. Group A included 72 (49.7%) patients, and Group B with 73 (50.3%) patients. There was no difference in the caecal intubation time between the 2 groups. A total of 33 (22.8%) colorectal polyps were found in 54 patients, of which 23 (31.9%) were detected with CAP and 10 (13.7%) without CAP. (<em>P</em>=.009). Mann-Whitney tests were also used, which showed that there was a significant difference in the number of polyps found between the CAP group and the standard colonoscopy group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study demonstrated that the use of CAP is associated with improved detection of the number of polyps. The caecal intubation time is not affected by the use of CAP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"28 4","pages":"Pages 143-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.10.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0188989316300914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

CAP-assisted colonoscopy (CAP) is a simple technique where use is made of plastic cylinder placed at the tip of the colonoscope. This plastic cylinder has extensions that can separate the colonic folds and enhance the field of observation, thus permitting the inspection of difficult to evaluate areas. Studies have been conducted to assess the effect of the CAP assisted colonoscopy in detecting polyps, with conflicting results.

Objective

To compare the number of polyps detected by CAP-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy.

Patients and Methods

A cross-sectional, comparative, randomized, experimental trial was conducted on patients that were randomised into 2 groups using a random numbers table. Group A was to standard colonoscopy, and the B group to CAP-assisted colonoscopy.

Results

A total of 147 patients were included, of which 2 were excluded because their work-up was incomplete. The remaining 145 patients, of whom 66.2% (96) were women and 33.8% (49) were men, were randomised into 2 groups. The mean age was 52.68 ±14.08 years. Group A included 72 (49.7%) patients, and Group B with 73 (50.3%) patients. There was no difference in the caecal intubation time between the 2 groups. A total of 33 (22.8%) colorectal polyps were found in 54 patients, of which 23 (31.9%) were detected with CAP and 10 (13.7%) without CAP. (P=.009). Mann-Whitney tests were also used, which showed that there was a significant difference in the number of polyps found between the CAP group and the standard colonoscopy group.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that the use of CAP is associated with improved detection of the number of polyps. The caecal intubation time is not affected by the use of CAP.

辅助“CAP”结肠镜与标准结肠镜检测腺瘤患病率的比较
简介CAP辅助结肠镜检查(CAP)是一种简单的技术,使用放置在结肠镜尖端的塑料圆柱体。这种塑料圆柱体的延伸部分可以分离结肠褶皱,增强观察范围,从而可以检查难以评估的区域。已经进行了研究来评估CAP辅助结肠镜检查在检测息肉方面的效果,但结果相互矛盾。目的比较CAP辅助结肠镜与标准结肠镜检测息肉的数量。患者和方法使用随机数表将患者随机分为2组,进行横断面、比较、随机实验试验。A组采用标准结肠镜检查,B组采用CAP辅助结肠镜检查。结果共纳入147例患者,其中2例因检查不完整而被排除在外。其余145名患者,其中66.2%(96)为女性,33.8%(49)为男性,被随机分为2组。平均年龄52.68±14.08岁。A组72例(49.7%),B组73例(50.3%)。两组盲肠插管时间无差异。54例患者共发现33个(22.8%)结肠息肉,其中23个(31.9%)检出CAP,10个(13.7%)未检出CAP。(P=.009)。还使用了Mann-Whitney试验,该试验表明CAP组和标准结肠镜检查组之间发现的息肉数量存在显著差异。结论本研究表明,CAP的使用与提高息肉数量的检测有关。盲肠插管时间不受CAP使用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信