Comparison of detector systems in oxidative stripping potentiometry

Christopher W.K. Chow, David E. Davey, Dennis E. Mulcahy
{"title":"Comparison of detector systems in oxidative stripping potentiometry","authors":"Christopher W.K. Chow,&nbsp;David E. Davey,&nbsp;Dennis E. Mulcahy","doi":"10.1016/S1381-141X(98)80006-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For oxidative stripping potentiometry (OSP) measurement, the achievement of reliable results is highly dependent upon the transport of oxidant to the electrode surface and, as a consequence, careful hydrodynamic control is crucial for reproducibility. Two types of detector system, batch and flow, with three different electrode systems, a standard voltammetric magnetic stirrer cell assembly, an voltammetric cell with optically controlled stirrer and a thin layer flow cell with peristaltic pump were compared. In the sensitivity studies, the static stripping procedure enhanced the sensitivity of the measurement compared to forced convection stripping. The use of a flow cell and peristaltic pump provided all the flexibility needed for OSP measurement. The sensitivity can be improved using the combination of fast deposition and slow stripping flow rates. From the viewpoint of reproducibility of the signals, excellent results were obtained for the use of the flow cell with peristaltic pump.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100862,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Automation & Information Management","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1381-141X(98)80006-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Automation & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1381141X98800063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For oxidative stripping potentiometry (OSP) measurement, the achievement of reliable results is highly dependent upon the transport of oxidant to the electrode surface and, as a consequence, careful hydrodynamic control is crucial for reproducibility. Two types of detector system, batch and flow, with three different electrode systems, a standard voltammetric magnetic stirrer cell assembly, an voltammetric cell with optically controlled stirrer and a thin layer flow cell with peristaltic pump were compared. In the sensitivity studies, the static stripping procedure enhanced the sensitivity of the measurement compared to forced convection stripping. The use of a flow cell and peristaltic pump provided all the flexibility needed for OSP measurement. The sensitivity can be improved using the combination of fast deposition and slow stripping flow rates. From the viewpoint of reproducibility of the signals, excellent results were obtained for the use of the flow cell with peristaltic pump.

氧化溶出电位法中检测系统的比较
对于氧化剥离电位法(OSP)测量,可靠结果的实现在很大程度上取决于氧化剂向电极表面的传输,因此,仔细的流体动力学控制对再现性至关重要。比较了具有三种不同电极系统的两种类型的检测器系统,分批和流动,即标准的伏安磁搅拌器池组件、具有光控搅拌器的伏安池和具有蠕动泵的薄层流动池。在灵敏度研究中,与强制对流汽提相比,静态汽提程序提高了测量的灵敏度。流动池和蠕动泵的使用提供了OSP测量所需的所有灵活性。使用快速沉积和慢速汽提流速的组合可以提高灵敏度。从信号再现性的观点来看,使用具有蠕动泵的流动池获得了极好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信