Re-emphasising the importance of catheter-based angiography to differentiate polyarteritis nodosa from cutaneous arteritis: Two case reports.

IF 0.9 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Koji Suzuki, Mitsuhiro Akiyama, Yasushi Kondo, Shuntaro Saito, Jun Kikuchi, Hironari Hanaoka, Yuko Kaneko
{"title":"Re-emphasising the importance of catheter-based angiography to differentiate polyarteritis nodosa from cutaneous arteritis: Two case reports.","authors":"Koji Suzuki, Mitsuhiro Akiyama, Yasushi Kondo, Shuntaro Saito, Jun Kikuchi, Hironari Hanaoka, Yuko Kaneko","doi":"10.1093/mrcr/rxad064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic necrotising vasculitis with a poor prognosis, characterised by inflammation and necrosis of medium-sized arteries. PAN patients can present with a wide range of systemic manifestations, whereas cutaneous arteritis (CA) is a restricted manifestation to skin of the disease with a more favourable prognosis. Thus, differentiation between PAN and CA is crucial. Here, we present two cases that were initially diagnosed as CA due to the limited presence of systemic symptoms, but were finally diagnosed as PAN through catheter-based angiography. Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography are increasingly used to diagnose PAN, neither case had any abnormal findings on these examinations. Our cases therefore underscore that catheter-based angiography is critical for differentiation between PAN and CA, even in cases with limited systemic symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94146,"journal":{"name":"Modern rheumatology case reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern rheumatology case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mrcr/rxad064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic necrotising vasculitis with a poor prognosis, characterised by inflammation and necrosis of medium-sized arteries. PAN patients can present with a wide range of systemic manifestations, whereas cutaneous arteritis (CA) is a restricted manifestation to skin of the disease with a more favourable prognosis. Thus, differentiation between PAN and CA is crucial. Here, we present two cases that were initially diagnosed as CA due to the limited presence of systemic symptoms, but were finally diagnosed as PAN through catheter-based angiography. Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography are increasingly used to diagnose PAN, neither case had any abnormal findings on these examinations. Our cases therefore underscore that catheter-based angiography is critical for differentiation between PAN and CA, even in cases with limited systemic symptoms.

再次强调导管血管造影术鉴别结节性多动脉炎和皮动脉炎的重要性:两例报告。
结节性多动脉炎(PAN)是一种预后不良的全身坏死性血管炎,其特征是中型动脉的炎症和坏死。PAN患者可表现出广泛的全身性表现,而皮动脉炎(CA)是该疾病皮肤的一种局限性表现,预后更为良好。因此,区分PAN和CA至关重要。在这里,我们介绍了两个病例,由于系统症状的存在有限,最初被诊断为CA,但最终通过基于导管的血管造影术被诊断为PAN。尽管增强计算机断层扫描和计算机断层造影血管造影术越来越多地用于诊断PAN,但这两个病例在这些检查中都没有任何异常发现。因此,我们的病例强调,基于导管的血管造影术对于区分PAN和CA至关重要,即使在系统症状有限的病例中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信