Commentary: Some water in the data desert: the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network's capacity to guide mitigation of cancer health disparities.

Robert A Winn, Katherine Y Tossas, Chyke Doubeni
{"title":"Commentary: Some water in the data desert: the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network's capacity to guide mitigation of cancer health disparities.","authors":"Robert A Winn, Katherine Y Tossas, Chyke Doubeni","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant progress in cancer research and treatment, a persistent knowledge gap exists in understanding and addressing cancer care disparities, particularly among populations that are marginalized. This knowledge deficit has led to a \"data divide,\" where certain groups lack adequate representation in cancer-related data, hindering their access to personalized and data-driven cancer care. This divide disproportionately affects marginalized and minoritized communities such as the U.S. Black population. We explore the concept of \"data deserts,\" wherein entire populations, often based on race, ethnicity, gender, disability, or geography, lack comprehensive and high-quality health data. Several factors contribute to data deserts, including underrepresentation in clinical trials, poor data quality, and limited access to digital technologies, particularly in rural and lower-socioeconomic communities.The consequences of data divides and data deserts are far-reaching, impeding equitable access to precision medicine and perpetuating health disparities. To bridge this divide, we highlight the role of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET), which employs population simulation modeling to quantify cancer care disparities, particularly among the U.S. Black population. We emphasize the importance of collecting quality data from various sources to improve model accuracy. CISNET's collaborative approach, utilizing multiple independent models, offers consistent results and identifies gaps in knowledge. It demonstrates the impact of systemic racism on cancer incidence and mortality, paving the way for evidence-based policies and interventions to eliminate health disparities. We suggest the potential use of voting districts/precincts as a unit of aggregation for future CISNET modeling, enabling targeted interventions and informed policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant progress in cancer research and treatment, a persistent knowledge gap exists in understanding and addressing cancer care disparities, particularly among populations that are marginalized. This knowledge deficit has led to a "data divide," where certain groups lack adequate representation in cancer-related data, hindering their access to personalized and data-driven cancer care. This divide disproportionately affects marginalized and minoritized communities such as the U.S. Black population. We explore the concept of "data deserts," wherein entire populations, often based on race, ethnicity, gender, disability, or geography, lack comprehensive and high-quality health data. Several factors contribute to data deserts, including underrepresentation in clinical trials, poor data quality, and limited access to digital technologies, particularly in rural and lower-socioeconomic communities.The consequences of data divides and data deserts are far-reaching, impeding equitable access to precision medicine and perpetuating health disparities. To bridge this divide, we highlight the role of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET), which employs population simulation modeling to quantify cancer care disparities, particularly among the U.S. Black population. We emphasize the importance of collecting quality data from various sources to improve model accuracy. CISNET's collaborative approach, utilizing multiple independent models, offers consistent results and identifies gaps in knowledge. It demonstrates the impact of systemic racism on cancer incidence and mortality, paving the way for evidence-based policies and interventions to eliminate health disparities. We suggest the potential use of voting districts/precincts as a unit of aggregation for future CISNET modeling, enabling targeted interventions and informed policy decisions.

评论:数据沙漠中的一些水:癌症干预和监测建模网络指导缓解癌症健康差异的能力。
尽管癌症研究和治疗取得了重大进展,但在理解和解决癌症护理差异方面,尤其是在边缘化人群中,仍存在持续的知识差距。这种知识缺失导致了“数据鸿沟”,某些群体在癌症相关数据中缺乏足够的代表性,阻碍了他们获得个性化和数据驱动的癌症护理。这种差异对边缘化和少数族裔社区(如美国黑人)的影响尤为严重。我们探讨了“数据沙漠”的概念,即整个人口,通常基于种族、民族、性别、残疾或地理,缺乏全面和高质量的健康数据。有几个因素导致了数据沙漠,包括临床试验中的代表性不足、数据质量差以及获得数字技术的机会有限,特别是在农村和社会经济地位较低的社区。数据鸿沟和数据沙漠的后果是深远的,阻碍了公平获得精准医疗,并使健康差距长期存在。为了弥合这一分歧,我们强调了癌症干预和监测建模网络(CISNET)的作用,该网络采用人口模拟建模来量化癌症护理差异,特别是美国黑人人口中的差异。我们强调从各种来源收集高质量数据以提高模型准确性的重要性。CISNET的协作方法利用了多个独立的模型,提供了一致的结果并确定了知识差距。它展示了系统性种族主义对癌症发病率和死亡率的影响,为消除健康差距的循证政策和干预措施铺平了道路。我们建议潜在地使用投票区/选区作为未来CISNET建模的聚合单元,从而实现有针对性的干预和知情的政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信