Predicting the Need for Surgery in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A New Internally Validated Scoring System.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI:10.31616/asj.2023.0023
Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi, Homa Sadeghian, Uduak-Obong Ekanem, Aleeza Safdar, Andrew James Grossbach, Stephanus Viljoen
{"title":"Predicting the Need for Surgery in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A New Internally Validated Scoring System.","authors":"Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi, Homa Sadeghian, Uduak-Obong Ekanem, Aleeza Safdar, Andrew James Grossbach, Stephanus Viljoen","doi":"10.31616/asj.2023.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a scoring system for predicting the need for surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The indications for surgery in patients with LDH are well established. However, the exact timing of surgery is not. According to surgeons, patients with failed conservative treatment who underwent delayed surgery, often after 6 months postsymptom initiation, have poor functional recovery and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study included patients with symptomatic LDH. Patients with an indication for emergent surgery such as profound or progressive motor deficit, cauda equina syndrome, and diagnoses other than single-level LDH were excluded from the analysis. All patients followed a conservative treatment regimen (a combination of physical therapy, pain medications, and/or spinal epidural steroid injections). Surgery was indicated for patients who continuously experienced pain despite maximal conservative therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 134 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among them, 108 (80.6%) responded to conservative management, and 26 (19.4%) underwent unilateral laminotomy and microdiscectomy. The symptom duration, disc degeneration grade on magnetic resonance imaging (Pfirrmann disc grade), herniated disc location and type, fragment size, and thecal sac diameter significantly differed between patients who responded to conservative treatment and those requiring surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system based on the anteroposterior size of the herniated disc fragment and herniated disc location and type was 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A scoring system based on herniated disc/fragment size, location, and type can be applied to predict the need for surgery in patients with LDH. In the future, this tool can be used to prevent unnecessarily prolonged conservative management (>4-8 weeks).</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Prospective study.

Purpose: To propose a scoring system for predicting the need for surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Overview of literature: The indications for surgery in patients with LDH are well established. However, the exact timing of surgery is not. According to surgeons, patients with failed conservative treatment who underwent delayed surgery, often after 6 months postsymptom initiation, have poor functional recovery and outcome.

Methods: The current study included patients with symptomatic LDH. Patients with an indication for emergent surgery such as profound or progressive motor deficit, cauda equina syndrome, and diagnoses other than single-level LDH were excluded from the analysis. All patients followed a conservative treatment regimen (a combination of physical therapy, pain medications, and/or spinal epidural steroid injections). Surgery was indicated for patients who continuously experienced pain despite maximal conservative therapy.

Results: In total, 134 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among them, 108 (80.6%) responded to conservative management, and 26 (19.4%) underwent unilateral laminotomy and microdiscectomy. The symptom duration, disc degeneration grade on magnetic resonance imaging (Pfirrmann disc grade), herniated disc location and type, fragment size, and thecal sac diameter significantly differed between patients who responded to conservative treatment and those requiring surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system based on the anteroposterior size of the herniated disc fragment and herniated disc location and type was 0.81.

Conclusions: A scoring system based on herniated disc/fragment size, location, and type can be applied to predict the need for surgery in patients with LDH. In the future, this tool can be used to prevent unnecessarily prolonged conservative management (>4-8 weeks).

预测腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术需求:一种新的内部验证评分系统。
研究设计:前瞻性研究。目的:提出一种预测腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者手术需求的评分系统。文献综述:LDH患者的手术指征已得到很好的确定。然而,手术的确切时间并不确定。根据外科医生的说法,保守治疗失败的患者接受延迟手术,通常在症状开始后6个月,其功能恢复和结果较差。方法:本研究包括有症状的LDH患者。分析中排除了有紧急手术指征的患者,如严重或进行性运动功能障碍、马尾综合征和单水平LDH以外的诊断。所有患者都遵循保守的治疗方案(物理治疗、止痛药和/或脊髓硬膜外类固醇注射的组合)。尽管进行了最大限度的保守治疗,但仍持续疼痛的患者需要进行手术治疗。结果:共有134名患者符合纳入和排除标准。其中,108例(80.6%)对保守治疗有反应,26例(19.4%)接受了单侧椎板切开术和微椎间盘切除术。对保守治疗有反应的患者和需要手术的患者的症状持续时间、磁共振成像的椎间盘退变分级(Pfirrmann椎间盘分级)、椎间盘突出的位置和类型、碎片大小和鞘囊直径存在显著差异。基于椎间盘突出碎片前后大小和椎间盘位置和类型的评分系统的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.81。结论:基于椎间盘/碎片大小、位置和类型评分系统可用于预测LDH患者的手术需求。未来,该工具可用于防止不必要的长期保守治疗(>4-8周)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信