Machine Learning-based Prediction of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006123
Arjun Verma, Jeffrey Balian, Joseph Hadaya, Alykhan Premji, Takayuki Shimizu, Timothy Donahue, Peyman Benharash
{"title":"Machine Learning-based Prediction of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Arjun Verma, Jeffrey Balian, Joseph Hadaya, Alykhan Premji, Takayuki Shimizu, Timothy Donahue, Peyman Benharash","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a novel machine learning model to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate prognostication of CR-POPF may allow for risk stratification and adaptive treatment strategies for potential PD candidates. However, antecedent models, such as the modified Fistula Risk Score (mFRS), are limited by poor discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All records entailing PD within the 2014 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were identified. In addition, patients undergoing PD at our institution between 2013 and 2021 were queried from our local data repository. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to estimate the risk of CR-POPF using data from the ACS NSQIP and evaluated using institutional data. Model discrimination was estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 12,281 and 445 patients undergoing PD were identified within the 2014 to 2018 ACS NSQIP and our institutional registry, respectively. Application of the XGBoost and mFRS scores to the internal validation dataset revealed that the former model had significantly greater AUROC (0.72 vs 0.68, P <0.001) and AUPRC (0.22 vs 0.18, P <0.001). Within the external validation dataset, the XGBoost model remained superior to the mFRS with an AUROC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84) versus 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.80, P <0.001). In addition, AUPRC was higher for the XGBoost model, compared with the mFRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our novel machine learning model consistently outperformed the previously validated mFRS within internal and external validation cohorts, thereby demonstrating its generalizability and utility for enhancing prediction of CR-POPF.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a novel machine learning model to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Background: Accurate prognostication of CR-POPF may allow for risk stratification and adaptive treatment strategies for potential PD candidates. However, antecedent models, such as the modified Fistula Risk Score (mFRS), are limited by poor discrimination and calibration.

Methods: All records entailing PD within the 2014 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were identified. In addition, patients undergoing PD at our institution between 2013 and 2021 were queried from our local data repository. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to estimate the risk of CR-POPF using data from the ACS NSQIP and evaluated using institutional data. Model discrimination was estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC).

Results: Overall, 12,281 and 445 patients undergoing PD were identified within the 2014 to 2018 ACS NSQIP and our institutional registry, respectively. Application of the XGBoost and mFRS scores to the internal validation dataset revealed that the former model had significantly greater AUROC (0.72 vs 0.68, P <0.001) and AUPRC (0.22 vs 0.18, P <0.001). Within the external validation dataset, the XGBoost model remained superior to the mFRS with an AUROC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84) versus 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.80, P <0.001). In addition, AUPRC was higher for the XGBoost model, compared with the mFRS.

Conclusion: Our novel machine learning model consistently outperformed the previously validated mFRS within internal and external validation cohorts, thereby demonstrating its generalizability and utility for enhancing prediction of CR-POPF.

基于机器学习的胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘预测。
目的:建立一种新的机器学习(ML)模型来预测胰十二指肠切除术后临床相关的胰瘘(CR-POPF)。总结背景数据:CR-POPF的准确预测可能允许潜在PD候选者的风险分层和适应性治疗策略。然而,先前的模型,如改良的瘘管风险评分(mFRS),受到较差的判别和校准的限制。方法:确定2014-2018年ACS NSQIP中涉及PD的所有记录。此外,从我们当地的数据存储库中查询了2013年至2021年间在我们机构接受PD治疗的患者。开发了一个极限梯度增强(XGBoost)模型,使用ACS NSQIP的数据来估计CR-POPF的风险,并使用机构数据进行评估。使用受试者工作特性下面积(AUROC)和精确回忆曲线(AUPRC)来估计模型判别率。结果:总体而言,在2014-2018年ACS NSQIP和我们的机构登记中,分别确定了12281名和445名接受PD的患者。XGBoost和mFRS评分在内部验证数据集中的应用表明,前一个模型的AUROC显著更大(0.72对0.68,P结论:我们的新ML模型在内部和外部验证队列中始终优于先前验证的mFRS,从而证明了其可推广性和增强CR-POPF预测的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信