Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production

IF 2.9 4区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Cinzia Daraio, Léopold Simar, Paul W. Wilson
{"title":"Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production","authors":"Cinzia Daraio,&nbsp;Léopold Simar,&nbsp;Paul W. Wilson","doi":"10.1111/ectj.12103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this paper, we demonstrate that standard central limit theorem (CLT) results do not hold for means of non-parametric, conditional efficiency estimators, and we provide new CLTs that permit applied researchers to make valid inference about mean conditional efficiency or to compare mean efficiency across groups of producers. The new CLTs are used to develop a test of the restrictive ‘separability’ condition that is necessary for second-stage regressions of efficiency estimates on environmental variables. We show that if this condition is violated, not only are second-stage regressions difficult to interpret and perhaps meaningless, but also first-stage, unconditional efficiency estimates are misleading. As such, the test developed here is of fundamental importance to applied researchers using non-parametric methods for efficiency estimation. The test is shown to be consistent and its local power is examined. Our simulation results indicate that our tests perform well both in terms of size and power. We provide a real-world empirical example by re-examining the paper by Aly et al. (1990, <i>Review of Economics and Statistics 72</i>, 211–18) and rejecting the separability assumption implicitly assumed by Aly et al., calling into question results that appear in hundreds of papers that have been published in recent years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50555,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ectj.12103","citationCount":"165","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ectj.12103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate that standard central limit theorem (CLT) results do not hold for means of non-parametric, conditional efficiency estimators, and we provide new CLTs that permit applied researchers to make valid inference about mean conditional efficiency or to compare mean efficiency across groups of producers. The new CLTs are used to develop a test of the restrictive ‘separability’ condition that is necessary for second-stage regressions of efficiency estimates on environmental variables. We show that if this condition is violated, not only are second-stage regressions difficult to interpret and perhaps meaningless, but also first-stage, unconditional efficiency estimates are misleading. As such, the test developed here is of fundamental importance to applied researchers using non-parametric methods for efficiency estimation. The test is shown to be consistent and its local power is examined. Our simulation results indicate that our tests perform well both in terms of size and power. We provide a real-world empirical example by re-examining the paper by Aly et al. (1990, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211–18) and rejecting the separability assumption implicitly assumed by Aly et al., calling into question results that appear in hundreds of papers that have been published in recent years.

条件效率测度的中心极限定理和非参数两阶段生产模型中“可分性”条件的检验
在本文中,我们证明了标准中心极限定理(CLT)的结果不适用于非参数条件效率估计量的均值,并且我们提供了新的CLT,允许应用研究人员对平均条件效率进行有效推断,或者比较生产者组间的平均效率。新的CLT用于开发限制性“可分性”条件的测试,该条件对于环境变量的效率估计的第二阶段回归是必要的。我们表明,如果违反了这一条件,不仅第二阶段的回归难以解释,可能毫无意义,而且第一阶段的无条件效率估计也会产生误导。因此,这里开发的测试对于使用非参数方法进行效率估计的应用研究人员来说至关重要。试验证明是一致的,并检查了其局部功率。我们的模拟结果表明,我们的测试在尺寸和功率方面都表现良好。我们通过重新审查Aly等人的论文,提供了一个真实世界的实证例子。(1990,《经济学与统计学评论》7211-18),并拒绝了Aly等人隐含的可分性假设。,这对近年来发表的数百篇论文中的研究结果提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Econometrics Journal
Econometrics Journal 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Econometrics Journal was established in 1998 by the Royal Economic Society with the aim of creating a top international field journal for the publication of econometric research with a standard of intellectual rigour and academic standing similar to those of the pre-existing top field journals in econometrics. The Econometrics Journal is committed to publishing first-class papers in macro-, micro- and financial econometrics. It is a general journal for econometric research open to all areas of econometrics, whether applied, computational, methodological or theoretical contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信