Effectiveness of individual therapy and group therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia

Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDipNSc(ClinNurs) MNSc, Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep), Tiffany Conroy-Hiller RN BN DipBusFLM
{"title":"Effectiveness of individual therapy and group therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia","authors":"Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDipNSc(ClinNurs) MNSc,&nbsp;Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep),&nbsp;Tiffany Conroy-Hiller RN BN DipBusFLM","doi":"10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00016.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Background </b> There is no simple, single treatment for schizophrenia and present approaches are based on clinical research and experience. Pharmacotherapy is the most common treatment for schizophrenia; however, unwanted side-effects are often problematic, and medications do not provide important coping skills. These skills are provided through forms of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy has been examined from a range of perspectives, including the effectiveness of group and individual treatments on behaviours and symptoms of schizophrenia. This review reports on the effectiveness of forms of group and individual therapy.</p>\n <p><b>Objectives </b> The objective of this review was to present the best available information on the use of group therapy and individual therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. This review summarises the findings of all relevant studies relating to these interventions. This review attempted to answer the question: which is more effective in improving symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, group or individual therapy?</p>\n <p><b>Inclusion criteria </b> The review included adult patients with schizophrenia. Interventions of interest were forms of group and individual therapy aimed at lessening the symptoms of schizophrenia. For the purposes of this review, individual therapy was regarded as a one-to-one interaction between a patient and a therapist, and group therapy excluded family therapy. Studies that examined symptom reduction, including measures of mental state, quality of life and social function, were included in this review. This review attempted to determine the efficacy of group and individual therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Therefore, randomised or pseudo-randomised controlled trials that address the use or comparison of these treatment modalities were included. High-quality systematic reviews of evidence of effectiveness were also included.</p>\n <p><b>Results </b> Based on the search terms used, 28 references relating to the use of some form of group or individual therapy, in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia, were identified. Of these, nine were excluded for not meeting the stated inclusion criteria and 19 were included in the analysis (17 trials and two systematic reviews). From these studies numerous treatment types were compared for the management of chronic schizophrenia. Meta-analysis was not possible given the level of heterogeneity in trial methods and measurement scales.</p>\n <p><b>Recommendations </b> The following recommendations are made:</p>\n <p>\n \n </p><ul>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Individual cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) can be effective in improving overall mental state and global functioning (level I).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Relapse and readmission rates are not improved by the use of ICBT (level I).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>ICBT using a psychodynamic or psychotherapy approach is recommended for outpatient care (level I).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>ICBT can be recommended to promote a 25% improvement in insight (number needed to treat = 10) (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Group psychotherapy is not effective at improving global functioning when given for short periods of time (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Interactive behavioural training is not effective at improving social functioning (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Longer-term group psychotherapy or modular skills training can be effective at improving overall psychological symptoms (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Modular skills training is effective at improving living skills and medication compliance (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Group psycho-educational training is not effective for improving medication compliance (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Coping skills training has a longer lasting effect on improving goal attainment than problem skills group training in patients with schizophrenia (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Intensive group cognitive behaviour therapy and supportive counselling effectively reduce the number of psychiatric symptoms and positive psychiatric symptoms in patients with a short duration of illness and less severe symptoms in the longer term (2 years) (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>The use of group psychotherapy can be effective at decreasing social anxiety and improving social interaction (level II).</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n \n <p>Group psychotherapy is ineffective at producing lasting improvement in polydipsia among subjects with schizophrenia (level II).</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":100738,"journal":{"name":"JBI Reports","volume":"2 10","pages":"309-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00016.x","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00016.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background There is no simple, single treatment for schizophrenia and present approaches are based on clinical research and experience. Pharmacotherapy is the most common treatment for schizophrenia; however, unwanted side-effects are often problematic, and medications do not provide important coping skills. These skills are provided through forms of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy has been examined from a range of perspectives, including the effectiveness of group and individual treatments on behaviours and symptoms of schizophrenia. This review reports on the effectiveness of forms of group and individual therapy.

Objectives The objective of this review was to present the best available information on the use of group therapy and individual therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. This review summarises the findings of all relevant studies relating to these interventions. This review attempted to answer the question: which is more effective in improving symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, group or individual therapy?

Inclusion criteria The review included adult patients with schizophrenia. Interventions of interest were forms of group and individual therapy aimed at lessening the symptoms of schizophrenia. For the purposes of this review, individual therapy was regarded as a one-to-one interaction between a patient and a therapist, and group therapy excluded family therapy. Studies that examined symptom reduction, including measures of mental state, quality of life and social function, were included in this review. This review attempted to determine the efficacy of group and individual therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Therefore, randomised or pseudo-randomised controlled trials that address the use or comparison of these treatment modalities were included. High-quality systematic reviews of evidence of effectiveness were also included.

Results Based on the search terms used, 28 references relating to the use of some form of group or individual therapy, in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia, were identified. Of these, nine were excluded for not meeting the stated inclusion criteria and 19 were included in the analysis (17 trials and two systematic reviews). From these studies numerous treatment types were compared for the management of chronic schizophrenia. Meta-analysis was not possible given the level of heterogeneity in trial methods and measurement scales.

Recommendations The following recommendations are made:

  • Individual cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) can be effective in improving overall mental state and global functioning (level I).

  • Relapse and readmission rates are not improved by the use of ICBT (level I).

  • ICBT using a psychodynamic or psychotherapy approach is recommended for outpatient care (level I).

  • ICBT can be recommended to promote a 25% improvement in insight (number needed to treat = 10) (level II).

  • Group psychotherapy is not effective at improving global functioning when given for short periods of time (level II).

  • Interactive behavioural training is not effective at improving social functioning (level II).

  • Longer-term group psychotherapy or modular skills training can be effective at improving overall psychological symptoms (level II).

  • Modular skills training is effective at improving living skills and medication compliance (level II).

  • Group psycho-educational training is not effective for improving medication compliance (level II).

  • Coping skills training has a longer lasting effect on improving goal attainment than problem skills group training in patients with schizophrenia (level II).

  • Intensive group cognitive behaviour therapy and supportive counselling effectively reduce the number of psychiatric symptoms and positive psychiatric symptoms in patients with a short duration of illness and less severe symptoms in the longer term (2 years) (level II).

  • The use of group psychotherapy can be effective at decreasing social anxiety and improving social interaction (level II).

  • Group psychotherapy is ineffective at producing lasting improvement in polydipsia among subjects with schizophrenia (level II).

个体治疗和团体治疗精神分裂症的疗效观察
背景精神分裂症没有简单、单一的治疗方法,目前的治疗方法是基于临床研究和经验。药物治疗是精神分裂症最常见的治疗方法;然而,不必要的副作用往往是有问题的,药物并不能提供重要的应对技巧。这些技能是通过各种形式的心理治疗提供的。心理治疗从一系列角度进行了研究,包括团体和个人治疗对精神分裂症行为和症状的有效性。这篇综述报告了团体和个人治疗形式的有效性。目的本综述的目的是提供关于团体治疗和个体治疗在精神分裂症治疗中的最佳可用信息。本综述总结了与这些干预措施相关的所有相关研究的结果。这篇综述试图回答这样一个问题:团体治疗和个体治疗哪一种对改善精神分裂症患者的症状更有效?纳入标准该综述包括成年精神分裂症患者。感兴趣的干预措施是旨在减轻精神分裂症症状的团体和个人治疗形式。在本综述中,个体治疗被视为患者和治疗师之间的一对一互动,而团体治疗排除了家庭治疗。本综述包括了检查症状减轻的研究,包括精神状态、生活质量和社会功能的测量。这篇综述试图确定群体和个体治疗精神分裂症的疗效。因此,纳入了针对这些治疗模式的使用或比较的随机或伪随机对照试验。还包括对有效性证据的高质量系统审查。结果根据所使用的搜索术语,确定了28篇与在治疗慢性精神分裂症中使用某种形式的团体或个人治疗有关的参考文献。其中,9项因不符合规定的纳入标准而被排除在外,19项被纳入分析(17项试验和两项系统综述)。从这些研究中,比较了多种治疗类型对慢性精神分裂症的治疗。考虑到试验方法和测量量表的异质性水平,荟萃分析是不可能的。建议提出以下建议:•个体认知行为疗法(ICBT)可以有效改善整体精神状态和整体功能(I级)。•ICBT(I级)的使用并没有提高复发率和再次入院率。•建议使用心理动力学或心理治疗方法的ICBT用于门诊护理(I级)。•ICBT可用于提高25%的洞察力(需要治疗的人数=10)(II级)。•团体心理治疗在短期内不能有效改善整体功能(II级)。•互动行为培训在改善社会功能方面并不有效(二级)。•长期的集体心理治疗或模块化技能培训可以有效改善整体心理症状(II级)。•模块化技能培训可有效提高生活技能和药物依从性(II级)。•团体心理教育培训对提高药物依从性(II级)无效。•在精神分裂症患者中,应对技能培训在提高目标实现方面的效果比问题技能小组培训更持久(II级)。•强化的群体认知行为治疗和支持性咨询有效地减少了病程短、症状较轻的长期患者的精神症状和阳性精神症状的数量(2 年)(二级)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信