Communicating and reporting: Practices and concerns of internal and external evaluators

Evaluation practice Pub Date : 1997-03-01 Epub Date: 2002-09-23 DOI:10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90016-7
Rosalie T. Torres , Hallie S. Preskill , Mary E. Piontek
{"title":"Communicating and reporting: Practices and concerns of internal and external evaluators","authors":"Rosalie T. Torres ,&nbsp;Hallie S. Preskill ,&nbsp;Mary E. Piontek","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90016-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated internal and external evaluators' practices and concerns about communicating and reporting evaluation findings. Approximately three-quarters (72%) of a random sample of American Evaluation Association members responded to a survey on this topic. Most of those responding: (1) adhere to traditional reporting formats; (2) are only moderately satisfied with their communicating and reporting efforts; (3) found that insufficient time and political/organizational complexity impedes success in communicating and reporting; and (4) describe effective practice as typically entailing high stakeholder involvement. Internal evaluation was found to be not only equally as prevalent as external evaluation, but different in relation to certain communication and reporting practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"18 2","pages":"Pages 105-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90016-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163397900167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2002/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated internal and external evaluators' practices and concerns about communicating and reporting evaluation findings. Approximately three-quarters (72%) of a random sample of American Evaluation Association members responded to a survey on this topic. Most of those responding: (1) adhere to traditional reporting formats; (2) are only moderately satisfied with their communicating and reporting efforts; (3) found that insufficient time and political/organizational complexity impedes success in communicating and reporting; and (4) describe effective practice as typically entailing high stakeholder involvement. Internal evaluation was found to be not only equally as prevalent as external evaluation, but different in relation to certain communication and reporting practices.

沟通和报告:内部和外部评估人员的实践和关注点
本研究调查了内部和外部评估人员在沟通和报告评估结果方面的做法和关切。大约四分之三(72%)的美国评估协会成员对这一主题的调查做出了回应。大多数答复者:(1)坚持传统的报告格式;(2) 对其沟通和报告工作仅适度满意;(3) 发现时间不足和政治/组织复杂性阻碍了沟通和报告的成功;以及(4)将有效实践描述为通常需要高度利益相关者的参与。内部评价不仅与外部评价一样普遍,而且在某些交流和报告做法方面也有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书