Integrating program and evaluation values: A family support approach to program evaluation

Evaluation practice Pub Date : 1996-09-01 Epub Date: 2002-09-23 DOI:10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90006-9
Beth L. Green , Laurie Mulvey , Heather A. Fisher , Flora Woratschek
{"title":"Integrating program and evaluation values: A family support approach to program evaluation","authors":"Beth L. Green ,&nbsp;Laurie Mulvey ,&nbsp;Heather A. Fisher ,&nbsp;Flora Woratschek","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90006-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the past several years, models of social service provision that are based on principles of “family support” have been implemented nationwide. Development of evaluation methods to adequately reflect the multifaceted nature of these programs, however, has lagged behind program development. It is particularly difficult (especially within the context of traditional evaluation paradigms) to develop evaluations that do not <em>in and of themselves</em> violate the principles of family support, which advocate for services that are strengths-based, collaborative, family-centered, comprehensive, and flexible. To this end, we have been collaborating with local agency directors, family support staff, and parents to develop an evaluation approach that is based on the general principles of family support. The work that we describe draws techniques from participatory, empowerment, and utilization-focused evaluation approaches, but operationalizes evaluation activities based on the guiding program value system. By tailoring the evaluation to the service philosophy, we contend that the evaluation process can become more thoroughly integrated with the service program, and thus provide a more useful and accurate picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 261-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90006-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2002/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past several years, models of social service provision that are based on principles of “family support” have been implemented nationwide. Development of evaluation methods to adequately reflect the multifaceted nature of these programs, however, has lagged behind program development. It is particularly difficult (especially within the context of traditional evaluation paradigms) to develop evaluations that do not in and of themselves violate the principles of family support, which advocate for services that are strengths-based, collaborative, family-centered, comprehensive, and flexible. To this end, we have been collaborating with local agency directors, family support staff, and parents to develop an evaluation approach that is based on the general principles of family support. The work that we describe draws techniques from participatory, empowerment, and utilization-focused evaluation approaches, but operationalizes evaluation activities based on the guiding program value system. By tailoring the evaluation to the service philosophy, we contend that the evaluation process can become more thoroughly integrated with the service program, and thus provide a more useful and accurate picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the program.

整合计画与评估价值:计画评估的家庭支持方法
在过去几年中,基于“家庭支持”原则的社会服务提供模式已在全国范围内实施。然而,为充分反映这些项目的多方面性质而开发的评估方法落后于项目开发。特别困难的是(特别是在传统评估模式的背景下),制定本身不违反家庭支持原则的评估,家庭支持原则提倡基于优势、协作、以家庭为中心、全面和灵活的服务。为此,我们一直在与当地机构主管、家庭支持人员和家长合作,制定一种基于家庭支持一般原则的评估方法。我们所描述的工作借鉴了以参与、赋权和利用为重点的评估方法中的技术,但基于指导性项目价值体系实施了评估活动。通过根据服务理念调整评估,我们认为评估过程可以与服务计划更彻底地结合在一起,从而更有用、更准确地了解计划的优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书