{"title":"Universal screening does not reduce the prevalence of visual impairment in older people","authors":"Robert W Enzenauer MD, MPH (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does targeted or universal screening for visual acuity improve visual outcomes in older people?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Cluster randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>There was no significant difference in the proportion of people with poor visual acuity with universal screening compared with targeted screening at follow-up (median follow-up 3.9 years; absolute risk for acuity <6/18 in either eye: 37.0% (339/978) with universal screening vs. 34.7% (307/829) with targeted screening; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.36; <em>P</em>=0.58). There was no significant difference in visual function between groups at follow up (mean composite NEI score: 86.0 with universal screening vs. 85.6 with targeted screening; mean difference: 0.4, 95% CI –1.7 to 2.5; <em>P</em>=0.69).</p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Universal screening for visual impairment in older people as part of multidimensional screening programme did not significantly decrease the overall prevalence of visual impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 150-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.03.009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Question
Does targeted or universal screening for visual acuity improve visual outcomes in older people?
Study design
Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Main results
There was no significant difference in the proportion of people with poor visual acuity with universal screening compared with targeted screening at follow-up (median follow-up 3.9 years; absolute risk for acuity <6/18 in either eye: 37.0% (339/978) with universal screening vs. 34.7% (307/829) with targeted screening; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.36; P=0.58). There was no significant difference in visual function between groups at follow up (mean composite NEI score: 86.0 with universal screening vs. 85.6 with targeted screening; mean difference: 0.4, 95% CI –1.7 to 2.5; P=0.69).
Authors’ conclusions
Universal screening for visual impairment in older people as part of multidimensional screening programme did not significantly decrease the overall prevalence of visual impairment.