Respuesta de los profesionales de medicina de familia a la difusión de la posible interacción entre clopidogrel y los inhibidores de la bomba de protones

M.A. García-Lirola , L. González-García , A. Ocaña Arenas , E. Espínola García , R. Díaz García , J. Ortiz Espinosa
{"title":"Respuesta de los profesionales de medicina de familia a la difusión de la posible interacción entre clopidogrel y los inhibidores de la bomba de protones","authors":"M.A. García-Lirola ,&nbsp;L. González-García ,&nbsp;A. Ocaña Arenas ,&nbsp;E. Espínola García ,&nbsp;R. Díaz García ,&nbsp;J. Ortiz Espinosa","doi":"10.1016/S2172-3761(10)70002-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Recently, different studies with contradictory results have been published on the possible interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPI). This study aims to analyze the response of the family medicine professionals in regards to modification in the treatment of patients using both drugs simultaneously after an intervention that consisted in the diffusion of the informative note issued by the Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, accompanied by pharmacotherapeutical recommendations and census of the affected patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Before and after quasiexperimental study was performed by the Health Care District of Granada. The study population included the patients who were being prescribed both medications in June 2009, identified through the computer program MicroStrategy. A total of 1499 patients were detected through sampling stratified by center and by gender. A sample of 360 clinical histories was obtained. The audit was done on 298. The outcome variable was the modification or not of treatment classified according to the therapeutic option chosen (elimination or substitution of any of the drugs administered simultaneously).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 42.6% (95% CI: 37–48) of the clinical histories, the physician modified treatment after diffusion of the note. In 19.68% of the patients, treatment with clopidogrel was discontinued or substituted with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). In the remaining 102 patients, the PPI was substituted with another drug or was withdrawn. In patients from teaching sites, more modifications of the treatment were made then in the nonteaching sites.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The number of patients with both drugs prescribed simultaneously decreased. Thus the intervention is shown to be a valid option to be incorporated into the usual practice in the work of primary care pharmacists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100520,"journal":{"name":"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 2-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2172-3761(10)70002-9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2172376110700029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, different studies with contradictory results have been published on the possible interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPI). This study aims to analyze the response of the family medicine professionals in regards to modification in the treatment of patients using both drugs simultaneously after an intervention that consisted in the diffusion of the informative note issued by the Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, accompanied by pharmacotherapeutical recommendations and census of the affected patients.

Methods

Before and after quasiexperimental study was performed by the Health Care District of Granada. The study population included the patients who were being prescribed both medications in June 2009, identified through the computer program MicroStrategy. A total of 1499 patients were detected through sampling stratified by center and by gender. A sample of 360 clinical histories was obtained. The audit was done on 298. The outcome variable was the modification or not of treatment classified according to the therapeutic option chosen (elimination or substitution of any of the drugs administered simultaneously).

Results

In 42.6% (95% CI: 37–48) of the clinical histories, the physician modified treatment after diffusion of the note. In 19.68% of the patients, treatment with clopidogrel was discontinued or substituted with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). In the remaining 102 patients, the PPI was substituted with another drug or was withdrawn. In patients from teaching sites, more modifications of the treatment were made then in the nonteaching sites.

Discussion

The number of patients with both drugs prescribed simultaneously decreased. Thus the intervention is shown to be a valid option to be incorporated into the usual practice in the work of primary care pharmacists.

家庭医学专业人员对氯吡格雷和质子泵抑制剂之间可能相互作用扩散的反应
引言最近,关于氯吡格雷和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)之间可能的相互作用,发表了不同的研究,但结果相互矛盾。本研究旨在分析家庭医学专业人员在干预后对同时使用两种药物的患者的治疗进行修改的反应,干预包括传播由Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productios Sanitarios,同时提供药物治疗建议和受影响患者的普查。方法由格拉纳达卫生保健区进行准实验研究。研究人群包括2009年6月通过计算机程序MicroStrategy确定的同时服用两种药物的患者。通过按中心和性别分层的抽样,共检测到1499名患者。获得了360例临床病史的样本。审计于298年完成。结果在42.6%(95%置信区间:37-48)的临床病史中,医生在注释扩散后修改了治疗。19.68%的患者停用氯吡格雷治疗或用乙酰水杨酸(ASA)替代。在剩下的102名患者中,PPI被另一种药物替代或停用。在教学点的患者中,对治疗方法的修改比在非教学点的要多。讨论同时服用两种药物的患者数量减少。因此,干预措施被证明是一种有效的选择,可以纳入初级保健药剂师工作的常规实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信