Intensive follow-up for colorectal cancer is cost-effective

Björn Ohlsson MD, PhD (Commentary Author)
{"title":"Intensive follow-up for colorectal cancer is cost-effective","authors":"Björn Ohlsson MD, PhD (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Is intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer cost-effective compared with conventional follow-up methods?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis based on a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>Over 5 years, people having intensive follow-up gained 0.73 to 0.82 life years compared with conventional follow-up (absolute reduction in mortality with intensive follow-up: all trials 7%; 95% CI 5% to 9%; extramural trials only 9%; 95% CI 7% to 11%). Additional costs incurred by intensive follow-up were £3402 per life year gained (or £3077 based on extramural trials only). The net costs per person were £2479 and £2529, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Intensive follow-up of people with colorectal cancer is cost-effective compared to conventional methods, based on a robust economic model and efficacy evidence from 5 RCTs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 186-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.05.019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question

Is intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer cost-effective compared with conventional follow-up methods?

Study design

Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis based on a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs.

Main results

Over 5 years, people having intensive follow-up gained 0.73 to 0.82 life years compared with conventional follow-up (absolute reduction in mortality with intensive follow-up: all trials 7%; 95% CI 5% to 9%; extramural trials only 9%; 95% CI 7% to 11%). Additional costs incurred by intensive follow-up were £3402 per life year gained (or £3077 based on extramural trials only). The net costs per person were £2479 and £2529, respectively.

Authors’ conclusions

Intensive follow-up of people with colorectal cancer is cost-effective compared to conventional methods, based on a robust economic model and efficacy evidence from 5 RCTs.

结直肠癌的强化随访具有成本效益
问与传统的随访方法相比,癌症根治性切除后的强化随访是否具有成本效益?研究设计基于5项随机对照试验的荟萃分析的增量成本效益分析。主要结果在5年内,与常规随访相比,接受强化随访的人增加了0.73至0.82个生命年(强化随访的死亡率绝对降低:所有试验7%;95%置信区间5%至9%;壁外试验仅9%;95%置信度7%至11%)。强化随访产生的额外费用为每个生命年增加3402英镑(或仅根据体外试验增加3077英镑)。人均净成本分别为2479英镑和2529英镑。作者的结论:根据一个稳健的经济模型和来自5个随机对照试验的疗效证据,与传统方法相比,对癌症结直肠癌患者进行强化随访具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信