Ethics consultations reduce time and procedures in intensive care

Lawrence J Nelson PhD, JD (Commentary Author)
{"title":"Ethics consultations reduce time and procedures in intensive care","authors":"Lawrence J Nelson PhD, JD (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What effect do ethics consultations have on number of life-sustaining treatments and length of stay in intensive care units?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main Results</h3><p>There were no differences in mortality between groups. In people who died in hospital, ethics consultation significantly reduced the number of days spent in intensive care and hospital (−1.44 days in intensive care, <em>p</em>=0.03; −2.95 days in hospital, <em>p</em>=0.01; −1.7 days on ventilation, <em>p</em>=0.03). Among people surviving to discharge, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups (<em>p</em>&gt;0.05). At least 80% of people interviewed during follow-up (including patients or family members and healthcare professionals) indicated that ethics consultations were helpful and would recommend them to others.</p></div><div><h3>Authors’ Conclusions</h3><p>Ethics consultations reduced length of stay in intensive care by people who did not survive to discharge, but did not alter outcomes for survivors. The consultations were well received by healthcare professionals, patients and their family members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 63-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.02.010","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Question

What effect do ethics consultations have on number of life-sustaining treatments and length of stay in intensive care units?

Study Design

Randomised controlled trial.

Main Results

There were no differences in mortality between groups. In people who died in hospital, ethics consultation significantly reduced the number of days spent in intensive care and hospital (−1.44 days in intensive care, p=0.03; −2.95 days in hospital, p=0.01; −1.7 days on ventilation, p=0.03). Among people surviving to discharge, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups (p>0.05). At least 80% of people interviewed during follow-up (including patients or family members and healthcare professionals) indicated that ethics consultations were helpful and would recommend them to others.

Authors’ Conclusions

Ethics consultations reduced length of stay in intensive care by people who did not survive to discharge, but did not alter outcomes for survivors. The consultations were well received by healthcare professionals, patients and their family members.

伦理咨询减少了重症监护的时间和程序
问题伦理咨询对维持生命的治疗次数和重症监护室的住院时间有什么影响?研究设计随机对照试验。主要结果各组死亡率无显著差异。在住院死亡的人中,伦理咨询显著减少了在重症监护和住院的天数(在重症监护中−1.44天,p=0.03;在医院中−2.95天,p=0.01;在通气中−1.7天,p=0.03),两组之间的临床结果没有显著差异(p>0.05)。在随访期间,至少80%的受访者(包括患者或家庭成员和医疗保健专业人员)表示伦理咨询是有帮助的,并会向其他人推荐。作者的结论伦理咨询减少了那些未能存活到出院的人在重症监护室的停留时间,但不会改变幸存者的结果。这些咨询受到了医疗专业人员、患者及其家属的好评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信