Percepción de los médicos de familia acerca de un programa de ayuda a la prescripción para reducir las interacciones medicamentosas

J.J. López-Picazo , J.C. Ruiz , Á. Ariza , B. Aguilera , J.F. Sánchez
{"title":"Percepción de los médicos de familia acerca de un programa de ayuda a la prescripción para reducir las interacciones medicamentosas","authors":"J.J. López-Picazo ,&nbsp;J.C. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Á. Ariza ,&nbsp;B. Aguilera ,&nbsp;J.F. Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/S2172-3761(12)70054-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess GP views on the usefulness and the kind of issue of a programme aimed to reduce the occurrence of drug interactions (DI) in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study. Questionnaire survey of GPs participating in the PRISMAp programme. Setting: Primary care, Murcia Region of Spain. Participants: 189 GPs participating in the PRISMAp programme who received periodic information about the DI detected in the electronic medical records of their patients. Measurements: questions about the usefulness (6), opportunities to improve (5) and the kind of issue of the report received (3) where asked using a 5-items Likert scale. The agreement/disagreement were obtained considering the percentage of Likert scores greater and smaller than 3, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The response rate was 43.9% (83 of 189). Of these, 77.5% think that PRISMAp is suitable to warn them about DI, 41.3% have changed their prescriptions, and 52.0% have frequently been informed about DI that they did not know. The best valued opportunities to improve were the incorporation of recommendations to the electronic prescription module (93.3%) and the warning of potential DI when prescribing (94.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides an approach to the perceptions and a better understanding of the GPs attitudes toward the programmes aimed to assist their prescriptions and, specially, toward those aimed to reduce the DI. They are considered useful and able to improve the safety or their prescription.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100520,"journal":{"name":"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 27-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2172-3761(12)70054-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2172376112700547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess GP views on the usefulness and the kind of issue of a programme aimed to reduce the occurrence of drug interactions (DI) in primary care.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional study. Questionnaire survey of GPs participating in the PRISMAp programme. Setting: Primary care, Murcia Region of Spain. Participants: 189 GPs participating in the PRISMAp programme who received periodic information about the DI detected in the electronic medical records of their patients. Measurements: questions about the usefulness (6), opportunities to improve (5) and the kind of issue of the report received (3) where asked using a 5-items Likert scale. The agreement/disagreement were obtained considering the percentage of Likert scores greater and smaller than 3, respectively.

Results

The response rate was 43.9% (83 of 189). Of these, 77.5% think that PRISMAp is suitable to warn them about DI, 41.3% have changed their prescriptions, and 52.0% have frequently been informed about DI that they did not know. The best valued opportunities to improve were the incorporation of recommendations to the electronic prescription module (93.3%) and the warning of potential DI when prescribing (94.7%).

Conclusions

This study provides an approach to the perceptions and a better understanding of the GPs attitudes toward the programmes aimed to assist their prescriptions and, specially, toward those aimed to reduce the DI. They are considered useful and able to improve the safety or their prescription.

家庭医生对减少药物相互作用的处方辅助计划的看法
目的评估全科医生对旨在减少初级保健中药物相互作用(DI)发生的计划的有用性和问题类型的看法。材料和方法横断面研究。对参与PRISMAp计划的全科医生进行问卷调查。背景:初级保健,西班牙穆尔西亚地区。参与者:189名参与PRISMAp计划的全科医生,他们定期收到患者电子医疗记录中检测到的DI信息。测量:使用5项Likert量表询问关于有用性(6)、改进机会(5)和收到报告的问题类型(3)的问题。同意/不同意分别考虑Likert分数大于和小于3的百分比。结果有效率为43.9%(83/189)。其中,77.5%的人认为PRISMAp适合警告他们DI,41.3%的人改变了处方,52.0%的人经常被告知他们不知道的DI。最有价值的改进机会是将建议纳入电子处方模块(93.3%)和处方时潜在DI的警告(94.7%),向那些旨在减少DI的人倾斜。它们被认为是有用的,能够提高安全性或处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信