[18F]FDG PET-TC radiomics and machine learning in the evaluation of prostate incidental uptake.

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2280685
Alberto Nieri, Luigi Manco, Matteo Bauckneht, Luca Urso, Matteo Caracciolo, Maria Isabella Donegani, Francesca Borgia, Kevin Vega, Alessandro Colella, Carmelo Ippolito, Corrado Cittanti, Silvia Morbelli, Gianmario Sambuceti, Alessandro Turra, Stefano Panareo, Mirco Bartolomei
{"title":"[18F]FDG PET-TC radiomics and machine learning in the evaluation of prostate incidental uptake.","authors":"Alberto Nieri, Luigi Manco, Matteo Bauckneht, Luca Urso, Matteo Caracciolo, Maria Isabella Donegani, Francesca Borgia, Kevin Vega, Alessandro Colella, Carmelo Ippolito, Corrado Cittanti, Silvia Morbelli, Gianmario Sambuceti, Alessandro Turra, Stefano Panareo, Mirco Bartolomei","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2280685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the relevance of incidental prostate [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptake (IPU) and to explore the potential of radiomics and machine learning (ML) to predict prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans with evidence of IPU performed in two institutions between 2015 and 2021. Patients were divided into PCa and non-PCa, according to the biopsy. Clinical and PET/CT-derived information (comprehensive of radiomic analysis) were acquired. Five ML models were developed and their performance in discriminating PCa vs non-PCa IPU was evaluated. Radiomic analysis was investigated to predict ISUP Grade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 56 IPU were identified and 31 patients performed prostate biopsy. Eighteen of those were diagnosed as PCa. Only PSA and radiomic features (eight from CT and nine from PET images, respectively) showed statistically significant difference between PCa and non-PCa patients. Eight features were found to be robust between the two institutions. CT-based ML models showed good performance, especially in terms of negative predictive value (NPV 0.733-0.867). PET-derived ML models results were less accurate except the Random Forest model (NPV = 0.933). Radiomics could not accurately predict ISUP grade.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paired with PSA, radiomic analysis seems to be promising to discriminate PCa/non-PCa IPU. ML could be a useful tool to identify non-PCa IPU, avoiding further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2280685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the relevance of incidental prostate [18F]FDG uptake (IPU) and to explore the potential of radiomics and machine learning (ML) to predict prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: We retrieved [18F]FDG PET/CT scans with evidence of IPU performed in two institutions between 2015 and 2021. Patients were divided into PCa and non-PCa, according to the biopsy. Clinical and PET/CT-derived information (comprehensive of radiomic analysis) were acquired. Five ML models were developed and their performance in discriminating PCa vs non-PCa IPU was evaluated. Radiomic analysis was investigated to predict ISUP Grade.

Results: Overall, 56 IPU were identified and 31 patients performed prostate biopsy. Eighteen of those were diagnosed as PCa. Only PSA and radiomic features (eight from CT and nine from PET images, respectively) showed statistically significant difference between PCa and non-PCa patients. Eight features were found to be robust between the two institutions. CT-based ML models showed good performance, especially in terms of negative predictive value (NPV 0.733-0.867). PET-derived ML models results were less accurate except the Random Forest model (NPV = 0.933). Radiomics could not accurately predict ISUP grade.

Conclusions: Paired with PSA, radiomic analysis seems to be promising to discriminate PCa/non-PCa IPU. ML could be a useful tool to identify non-PCa IPU, avoiding further investigations.

[18F]FDG PET-TC放射组学和机器学习在前列腺偶然摄取评估中的应用。
目的:评估附带前列腺[18F]FDG摄取(IPU)的相关性,并探索放射组学和机器学习(ML)预测前列腺癌症(PCa)的潜力。根据活检将患者分为前列腺癌和非前列腺癌。获得了临床和PET/CT衍生的信息(全面的放射组学分析)。5. 开发了ML模型,并评估了它们在区分前列腺癌与非前列腺癌IPU方面的性能。通过放射分析预测ISUP分级。结果:共发现56例IPU,31例患者进行了前列腺活检。其中18人被诊断为前列腺癌。只有PSA和放射学特征(分别来自CT的8个和来自PET的9个)在前列腺癌/非前列腺癌患者之间显示出统计学上的显著差异。八个特点使这两个机构之间关系密切。基于CT的ML模型表现出良好的性能,尤其是在负预测值方面(NPV 0.733-0.867)。PET衍生的ML模型的准确性较差,除了随机森林模型(NPV = 0.933)。放射组学不能准确预测ISUP分级。结论:结合PSA,放射组学分析似乎有望鉴别前列腺癌/非前列腺癌IPU。ML可以成为识别非PCa议会联盟的有用工具,从而避免进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信