Facilitators, barriers, and key influencers of breastfeeding among low birthweight infants: a qualitative study in India, Malawi, and Tanzania.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Linda Vesel, Emily Benotti, Sarah Somji, Roopa M Bellad, Umesh Charantimath, Sangappa M Dhaded, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Chandrashekhar Karadiguddi, Geetanjali Mungarwadi, Sunil S Vernekar, Rodrick Kisenge, Karim Manji, Nahya Salim, Abraham Samma, Christopher R Sudfeld, Irving F Hoffman, Tisungane Mvalo, Melda Phiri, Friday Saidi, Jennifer Tseka, Mercy Tsidya, Bethany A Caruso, Christopher P Duggan, Kiersten Israel-Ballard, Anne Cc Lee, Kimberly L Mansen, Stephanie L Martin, Krysten North, Melissa F Young, Eliza Fishman, Katelyn Fleming, Katherine Ea Semrau, Lauren Spigel, Danielle E Tuller, Natalie Henrich
{"title":"Facilitators, barriers, and key influencers of breastfeeding among low birthweight infants: a qualitative study in India, Malawi, and Tanzania.","authors":"Linda Vesel, Emily Benotti, Sarah Somji, Roopa M Bellad, Umesh Charantimath, Sangappa M Dhaded, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Chandrashekhar Karadiguddi, Geetanjali Mungarwadi, Sunil S Vernekar, Rodrick Kisenge, Karim Manji, Nahya Salim, Abraham Samma, Christopher R Sudfeld, Irving F Hoffman, Tisungane Mvalo, Melda Phiri, Friday Saidi, Jennifer Tseka, Mercy Tsidya, Bethany A Caruso, Christopher P Duggan, Kiersten Israel-Ballard, Anne Cc Lee, Kimberly L Mansen, Stephanie L Martin, Krysten North, Melissa F Young, Eliza Fishman, Katelyn Fleming, Katherine Ea Semrau, Lauren Spigel, Danielle E Tuller, Natalie Henrich","doi":"10.1186/s13006-023-00597-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low birthweight (LBW) infants are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Exclusive breastfeeding up to six months is recommended to help them thrive through infection prevention, growth improvements, and enhancements in neurodevelopment. However, limited data exist on the feeding experiences of LBW infants, their caregivers and key community influencers. The qualitative component of the Low Birthweight Infant Feeding Exploration (LIFE) study aimed to understand practices, facilitators, and barriers to optimal feeding options in the first six months for LBW infants in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in four sites in India, Malawi, and Tanzania from July 2019 to August 2020. We conducted 37 focus group discussions with mothers and family members of LBW infants and community leaders and 142 in-depth interviews with healthcare providers, government officials, and supply chain and donor human milk (DHM) experts. Data were analyzed using a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants believed that mother's own milk was best for LBW infants. Direct breastfeeding was predominant and feeding expressed breast milk and infant formula were rare. DHM was a new concept for most. Adequate maternal nutrition, lactation support, and privacy in the facility aided breastfeeding and expression, but perceived insufficient milk, limited feeding counseling, and infant immaturity were common barriers. Most believed that DHM uptake could be enabled through community awareness by overcoming misconceptions, safety concerns, and perceived family resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study fills an evidence gap in LBW infant feeding practices and their facilitators and barriers in resource-limited settings. LBW infants face unique feeding challenges such as poor latching and tiring at the breast. Similarly, their mothers are faced with numerous difficulties, including attainment of adequate milk supply, breast pain and emotional stress. Lactation support and feeding counseling could address obstacles faced by mothers and infants by providing psychosocial, verbal and physical support to empower mothers with skills, knowledge and confidence and facilitate earlier, more and better breast milk feeding. Findings on DHM are critical to the future development of human milk banks and highlight the need to solicit partnership from stakeholders in the community and health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00597-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low birthweight (LBW) infants are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Exclusive breastfeeding up to six months is recommended to help them thrive through infection prevention, growth improvements, and enhancements in neurodevelopment. However, limited data exist on the feeding experiences of LBW infants, their caregivers and key community influencers. The qualitative component of the Low Birthweight Infant Feeding Exploration (LIFE) study aimed to understand practices, facilitators, and barriers to optimal feeding options in the first six months for LBW infants in low-resource settings.

Methods: This study was conducted in four sites in India, Malawi, and Tanzania from July 2019 to August 2020. We conducted 37 focus group discussions with mothers and family members of LBW infants and community leaders and 142 in-depth interviews with healthcare providers, government officials, and supply chain and donor human milk (DHM) experts. Data were analyzed using a framework approach.

Results: All participants believed that mother's own milk was best for LBW infants. Direct breastfeeding was predominant and feeding expressed breast milk and infant formula were rare. DHM was a new concept for most. Adequate maternal nutrition, lactation support, and privacy in the facility aided breastfeeding and expression, but perceived insufficient milk, limited feeding counseling, and infant immaturity were common barriers. Most believed that DHM uptake could be enabled through community awareness by overcoming misconceptions, safety concerns, and perceived family resistance.

Conclusion: This study fills an evidence gap in LBW infant feeding practices and their facilitators and barriers in resource-limited settings. LBW infants face unique feeding challenges such as poor latching and tiring at the breast. Similarly, their mothers are faced with numerous difficulties, including attainment of adequate milk supply, breast pain and emotional stress. Lactation support and feeding counseling could address obstacles faced by mothers and infants by providing psychosocial, verbal and physical support to empower mothers with skills, knowledge and confidence and facilitate earlier, more and better breast milk feeding. Findings on DHM are critical to the future development of human milk banks and highlight the need to solicit partnership from stakeholders in the community and health system.

低出生体重婴儿母乳喂养的推动者、障碍和关键影响因素:一项在印度、马拉维和坦桑尼亚进行的定性研究。
背景:低出生体重儿的发病率和死亡率增加。建议六个月以内的纯母乳喂养,以通过预防感染、改善生长和增强神经发育来帮助他们茁壮成长。然而,关于LBW婴儿、其照顾者和关键社区影响者的喂养体验的数据有限。低出生体重婴儿喂养探索(LIFE)研究的定性组成部分旨在了解低出生体重儿在低资源环境中前六个月最佳喂养选择的实践、促进因素和障碍。方法:本研究于2019年7月至2020年8月在印度、马拉维和坦桑尼亚的四个地点进行。我们与LBW婴儿的母亲和家庭成员以及社区领袖进行了37次焦点小组讨论,并与医疗保健提供者、政府官员、供应链和捐赠母乳(DHM)专家进行了142次深入访谈。使用框架方法对数据进行分析。结果:所有参与者都认为母乳最适合LBW婴儿。直接母乳喂养占主导地位,母乳喂养和婴儿配方奶粉很少。DHM对大多数人来说是一个新概念。充足的产妇营养、哺乳支持和设施内的隐私有助于母乳喂养和表达,但认为乳汁不足、喂养咨询有限和婴儿不成熟是常见的障碍。大多数人认为,通过克服误解、安全问题和感知到的家庭阻力,社区意识可以促进DHM的吸收。结论:本研究填补了LBW婴儿喂养实践及其在资源有限的环境中的促进因素和障碍的证据空白。LBW婴儿面临着独特的喂养挑战,如闭锁不良和乳房疲劳。同样,她们的母亲也面临许多困难,包括获得充足的母乳供应、乳房疼痛和情绪压力。哺乳支持和喂养咨询可以通过提供心理、语言和身体支持来解决母亲和婴儿面临的障碍,增强母亲的技能、知识和信心,并促进更早、更多、更好的母乳喂养。DHM的研究结果对母乳库的未来发展至关重要,并强调了征求社区和卫生系统利益相关者伙伴关系的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信