The Cambridge Experience with Lower Limb Long Bone Non-union Following Fixation and the Treatment Algorithm.

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Freideriki Poutoglidou, Matija Krkovic
{"title":"The Cambridge Experience with Lower Limb Long Bone Non-union Following Fixation and the Treatment Algorithm.","authors":"Freideriki Poutoglidou, Matija Krkovic","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Non-unions have been traditionally classified as atrophic, oligotrophic and hypertrophic and their management was primarily dictated by that. In our Unit, we have based our treatment rationale mainly on the stability of the metalwork and the presence of symptoms rather than the radiologic appearance of the non-union or the presence of infection. The aim was to present the treatment algorithm for lower limb long bone non-union following operative fixation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients treated for a femoral or tibial non-union following fixation between 2014 and 2020 in our unit and with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Non-union was defined as having no evidence of fracture healing in any cortices six months after the index procedure. Union was defined as bridging callus in at least three cortices visualized on at least two orthogonal radiographs. Information retrieved included demographic and fracture characteristics, presence of infection, evidence of metalwork stability and treatment. Outcome measures included union rate, time to union and complications. Data were analysed with the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) using contingency tables and linear regression. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Union was achieved in 91% of the cases, while union was noted in all the patients treated non-operatively. The mean time to union was 14.49 months (9.98). Complications were encountered in 20 of the patients and the most common were docking site non-union and metalwork breakage. Infection was the only factor that affected time to union in a statistically significant manner (<i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our study suggest that in cases of long bone non-union following operative fixation using signs of metalwork instability and the presence of clinical symptoms as the main indication for surgical intervention provides a satisfactory outcome. This approach prevented operative management in a large proportion of patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This article presents an algorithmic approach that could aid clinicians in their decision-making in long-bone non-union management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic level III.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Poutoglidou F, Krkovic M. The Cambridge Experience with Lower Limb Long Bone Non-union Following Fixation and the Treatment Algorithm. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):100-105.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"18 2","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Non-unions have been traditionally classified as atrophic, oligotrophic and hypertrophic and their management was primarily dictated by that. In our Unit, we have based our treatment rationale mainly on the stability of the metalwork and the presence of symptoms rather than the radiologic appearance of the non-union or the presence of infection. The aim was to present the treatment algorithm for lower limb long bone non-union following operative fixation.

Materials and methods: All patients treated for a femoral or tibial non-union following fixation between 2014 and 2020 in our unit and with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Non-union was defined as having no evidence of fracture healing in any cortices six months after the index procedure. Union was defined as bridging callus in at least three cortices visualized on at least two orthogonal radiographs. Information retrieved included demographic and fracture characteristics, presence of infection, evidence of metalwork stability and treatment. Outcome measures included union rate, time to union and complications. Data were analysed with the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) using contingency tables and linear regression. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Seventy-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Union was achieved in 91% of the cases, while union was noted in all the patients treated non-operatively. The mean time to union was 14.49 months (9.98). Complications were encountered in 20 of the patients and the most common were docking site non-union and metalwork breakage. Infection was the only factor that affected time to union in a statistically significant manner (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that in cases of long bone non-union following operative fixation using signs of metalwork instability and the presence of clinical symptoms as the main indication for surgical intervention provides a satisfactory outcome. This approach prevented operative management in a large proportion of patients.

Clinical significance: This article presents an algorithmic approach that could aid clinicians in their decision-making in long-bone non-union management.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic level III.

How to cite this article: Poutoglidou F, Krkovic M. The Cambridge Experience with Lower Limb Long Bone Non-union Following Fixation and the Treatment Algorithm. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):100-105.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

固定后下肢长骨不连的剑桥经验和治疗算法。
目的:传统上将不愈合分为萎缩性、寡营养性和肥大性,其处理主要由萎缩性、贫营养性和肥厚性决定。在我们的单位,我们的治疗原理主要基于金属制品的稳定性和症状的存在,而不是不愈合或感染的放射学表现。目的是提出手术固定后下肢长骨不连的治疗算法。材料和方法:纳入2014年至2020年间在我们单位接受固定术后股骨或胫骨不连治疗的所有患者,随访时间至少为2年。不愈合被定义为在指数手术后六个月内没有任何皮质骨折愈合的证据。愈合被定义为在至少两张正交射线照片上观察到的至少三个皮质中的桥接愈伤组织。检索到的信息包括人口统计学和骨折特征、是否存在感染、金属制品稳定性和治疗的证据。结果指标包括愈合率、愈合时间和并发症。数据使用社会科学统计程序(SPSS)使用列联表和线性回归进行分析。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:77名连续患者被纳入研究。91%的病例实现了愈合,而所有非手术治疗的患者都注意到了愈合。平均愈合时间为14.49个月(9.98)。20例患者出现并发症,最常见的是对接部位不愈合和金属制品断裂。感染是影响愈合时间的唯一因素,具有统计学意义(p=0.006)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在手术固定后长骨不愈合的病例中,将金属制品不稳定的迹象和临床症状作为手术干预的主要指征,可提供令人满意的结果。这种方法在很大一部分患者中阻止了手术治疗。临床意义:本文提出了一种算法方法,可以帮助临床医生在长骨不愈合管理中做出决策。证据水平:治疗水平III。如何引用本文:Poutoglidou F,Krkovic M.固定后下肢长骨不连的剑桥经验和治疗算法。2023年创伤肢体康复策略;18(2):100-105。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信