Long-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1177/21925682231214067
Graham S Goh, Adriel You Wei Tay, Gerald J Zeng, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
{"title":"Long-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Graham S Goh, Adriel You Wei Tay, Gerald J Zeng, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh","doi":"10.1177/21925682231214067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of prospective data.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) may be beneficial for elderly patients due to decreased surgical morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF in elderly patients and younger controls at minimum 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 120 patients who underwent single-level MIS-TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Elderly patients (≥70 years; n = 30) and controls (<70 years; n = 90) were matched 1:3 for demographics, comorbidities and preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Physical (SF-36 PCS) and Mental Component Summary (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain were compared at 6 months, 2 years and 5 years. Radiographic fusion, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and revision rates were assessed at mean 7.2 ± 2.0 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elderly patients had longer length of stay (4.7 ± 5.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.4 days, <i>P</i> = .035) and more readmissions (10% vs 1%, <i>P</i> = .019), but there was no difference in operative time, transfusions, complications or discharge disposition. All PROs were comparable at 5 years and satisfaction rates were similar (93% elderly vs 91% controls, <i>P</i> = .703). The rates of radiographic fusion in the control group and elderly group were similar (94% vs 97%, <i>P</i> = .605), as were the rates of ASD (40% vs 33%, <i>P</i> = .503). There were 3 revisions (3.3%) in the control group (2 for ASD, 1 for screw loosening) but none in the elderly group (<i>P</i> = .311).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients undergoing MIS-TLIF achieved similar improvements in pain, disability and quality of life that were sustained at 5 years.<b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"838-845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231214067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective review of prospective data.

Objectives: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) may be beneficial for elderly patients due to decreased surgical morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF in elderly patients and younger controls at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Methods: There were 120 patients who underwent single-level MIS-TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Elderly patients (≥70 years; n = 30) and controls (<70 years; n = 90) were matched 1:3 for demographics, comorbidities and preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Physical (SF-36 PCS) and Mental Component Summary (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain were compared at 6 months, 2 years and 5 years. Radiographic fusion, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and revision rates were assessed at mean 7.2 ± 2.0 years.

Results: Elderly patients had longer length of stay (4.7 ± 5.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.4 days, P = .035) and more readmissions (10% vs 1%, P = .019), but there was no difference in operative time, transfusions, complications or discharge disposition. All PROs were comparable at 5 years and satisfaction rates were similar (93% elderly vs 91% controls, P = .703). The rates of radiographic fusion in the control group and elderly group were similar (94% vs 97%, P = .605), as were the rates of ASD (40% vs 33%, P = .503). There were 3 revisions (3.3%) in the control group (2 for ASD, 1 for screw loosening) but none in the elderly group (P = .311).

Conclusions: Elderly patients undergoing MIS-TLIF achieved similar improvements in pain, disability and quality of life that were sustained at 5 years.Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

老年患者微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术的长期疗效:一项5年随访研究。
研究设计:前瞻性数据的回顾性审查。目的:微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术(MIS-TLIF)可能对老年患者有益,因为它可以降低手术发病率,加快术后恢复。本研究比较了至少5年随访的老年患者和年轻对照组的MIS-TLIF的临床和放射学结果。老年患者(≥70岁;n=30)和对照组(结果:老年患者的住院时间更长(4.7±5.8 vs 3.3±1.4天,P=0.035),再次入院次数更多(10%vs 1%,P=0.019),但在手术时间、输血、并发症或出院处置方面没有差异。所有PROs在5年时具有可比性,满意率相似(93%的老年人与91%的对照组,P=0.003)。对照组和老年组的放射学融合率相似(94%与97%,P=0.005),ASD的发生率也是如此(40%vs 33%,P=.503)。对照组有3次翻修(3.3%)(2次为ASD,1次为螺钉松动),但老年组没有(P=.311)。结论:接受MIS-TLIF的老年患者在疼痛、残疾和生活质量方面取得了5年来持续的类似改善。证据水平:III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信