Decomposing the late positive potential to cannabis cues in regular cannabis users: A temporal-spatial principal component analysis.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14471
Thomas J Preston, Jesse R Cougle, Norman B Schmidt, Richard J Macatee
{"title":"Decomposing the late positive potential to cannabis cues in regular cannabis users: A temporal-spatial principal component analysis.","authors":"Thomas J Preston, Jesse R Cougle, Norman B Schmidt, Richard J Macatee","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is increasing in the United States, yet, specific neural mechanisms of CUD are not well understood. Disordered substance use is characterized by heightened drug cue incentive salience, which can be measured using the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential (ERP) evoked by motivationally significant stimuli. The drug cue LPP is typically quantified by averaging the slow wave's scalp-recorded amplitude across its entire time course, which may obscure distinct underlying factors with differential predictive validity; however, no study to date has examined this possibility. In a sample of 105 cannabis users, temporo-spatial Principal Component Analysis was used to decompose cannabis cue modulation of the LPP into its underlying factors. Acute stress was also inducted to allow for identification of specific cannabis LPP factors sensitive to stress. Factor associations with CUD severity were also explored. Eight factors showed significantly increased amplitudes to cannabis images relative to neutral images. These factors spanned early (~372 ms), middle (~824 ms), and late (>1000 ms) windows across frontal, central, and parietal-occipital sites. CUD phenotype individual differences were primarily associated with frontal, middle/late latency factor amplitudes. Acute stress effects were limited to one early central and one late frontal factor. Taken together, results suggest that the cannabis LPP can be decomposed into distinct, temporal-spatial factors with differential responsivity to acute stress and CUD phenotype variability. Future individual difference studies examining drug cue modulation of the LPP should consider (1) frontalcentral poolings in addition to conventional central-parietal sites, and (2) later LPP time windows.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is increasing in the United States, yet, specific neural mechanisms of CUD are not well understood. Disordered substance use is characterized by heightened drug cue incentive salience, which can be measured using the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential (ERP) evoked by motivationally significant stimuli. The drug cue LPP is typically quantified by averaging the slow wave's scalp-recorded amplitude across its entire time course, which may obscure distinct underlying factors with differential predictive validity; however, no study to date has examined this possibility. In a sample of 105 cannabis users, temporo-spatial Principal Component Analysis was used to decompose cannabis cue modulation of the LPP into its underlying factors. Acute stress was also inducted to allow for identification of specific cannabis LPP factors sensitive to stress. Factor associations with CUD severity were also explored. Eight factors showed significantly increased amplitudes to cannabis images relative to neutral images. These factors spanned early (~372 ms), middle (~824 ms), and late (>1000 ms) windows across frontal, central, and parietal-occipital sites. CUD phenotype individual differences were primarily associated with frontal, middle/late latency factor amplitudes. Acute stress effects were limited to one early central and one late frontal factor. Taken together, results suggest that the cannabis LPP can be decomposed into distinct, temporal-spatial factors with differential responsivity to acute stress and CUD phenotype variability. Future individual difference studies examining drug cue modulation of the LPP should consider (1) frontalcentral poolings in addition to conventional central-parietal sites, and (2) later LPP time windows.

在经常吸食大麻的人中分解大麻线索的后期积极潜力:时间-空间主成分分析。
大麻使用障碍(CUD)在美国正在增加,但CUD的具体神经机制尚不清楚。无序物质使用的特征是药物线索刺激显著性增加,这可以使用晚期正电位(LPP)来测量,这是一种由动机显著刺激引起的事件相关电位(ERP)。药物线索LPP通常通过对慢波在整个时间过程中头皮记录的振幅进行平均来量化,这可能会模糊具有差异预测有效性的不同潜在因素;然而,迄今为止,没有任何研究对这种可能性进行研究。在105名大麻使用者的样本中,使用时间-空间主成分分析将大麻线索对LPP的调节分解为其潜在因素。还引入了急性应激,以确定对应激敏感的特定大麻LPP因子。还探讨了与CUD严重程度相关的因素。八个因素显示大麻图像的振幅相对于中性图像显著增加。这些因素跨越额叶、中央和顶叶枕叶部位的早期(~372 ms)、中期(~824 ms)和晚期(>1000 ms)窗口。CUD表型个体差异主要与额叶、中/晚期潜伏因子振幅有关。急性应激效应仅限于一个早期中枢因素和一个晚期额叶因素。总之,结果表明,大麻LPP可以分解为不同的时空因素,对急性应激和CUD表型变异具有不同的反应性。未来研究LPP药物线索调节的个体差异研究应考虑(1)除传统的顶叶中央部位外的额中央池,以及(2)后期的LPP时间窗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信