Use of a Digital Conversational Agent for the Management of Overactive Bladder.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001428
David Sheyn, Natalie Chakraborty, Yufan Brandon Chen, Sangeeta T Mahajan, Adonis Hijaz
{"title":"Use of a Digital Conversational Agent for the Management of Overactive Bladder.","authors":"David Sheyn, Natalie Chakraborty, Yufan Brandon Chen, Sangeeta T Mahajan, Adonis Hijaz","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Conservative therapy is effective for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) but may be limited by accessibility to care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a digital conversational agent (CeCe) for the treatment of OAB.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective observational trial utilizing a digital conversational agent developed by Renalis University Hospitals (Cleveland, Ohio) for the treatment of OAB. Patients were given access to CeCe over an 8-week period and were instructed on how to perform bladder training and pelvic floor exercises and taught about bladder health. The primary outcome was a decrease in the International Consultation on Incontinence-Overactive Bladder Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (ICIQ-OAB-QoL) score from week 1 to week 8. Patients also completed the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire at the same intervals and voiding diaries at weeks 1, 4, and 8. A power analysis was performed and determined that a total of 30 patients would be needed to demonstrate a significant difference in symptom scores after use of CeCe with 80% power and an α error of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients completed all data collection. The ICIQ-OAB-QoL scores were significantly different between weeks 1 and 8 (62 [IQR], 49-75) vs 32 [IQR, 24-43]; P < 0.001). Patients also reported a decrease in frequency pretreatment and posttreatment (7 [IQR, 6-10] vs 5 [IQR, 4-7]; P = -0.04), nocturia (2 [IQR, 1-3] vs 1 [IQR, 1-2]; P = 0.03), and urge urinary incontinence (2 [IQR, 1-5] vs 0 [IQR, 0-3]; P = 0.04). Consumption of alcohol decreased from week 1 to week 8 (24 oz [IQR, 12-36 oz) to 14 oz (IQR, 9-22 oz]; P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a digital conversational agent effectively reduced the severity of symptoms and improved quality of life in patients with OAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Conservative therapy is effective for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) but may be limited by accessibility to care.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a digital conversational agent (CeCe) for the treatment of OAB.

Study design: This was a prospective observational trial utilizing a digital conversational agent developed by Renalis University Hospitals (Cleveland, Ohio) for the treatment of OAB. Patients were given access to CeCe over an 8-week period and were instructed on how to perform bladder training and pelvic floor exercises and taught about bladder health. The primary outcome was a decrease in the International Consultation on Incontinence-Overactive Bladder Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (ICIQ-OAB-QoL) score from week 1 to week 8. Patients also completed the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire at the same intervals and voiding diaries at weeks 1, 4, and 8. A power analysis was performed and determined that a total of 30 patients would be needed to demonstrate a significant difference in symptom scores after use of CeCe with 80% power and an α error of 5%.

Results: Twenty-nine patients completed all data collection. The ICIQ-OAB-QoL scores were significantly different between weeks 1 and 8 (62 [IQR], 49-75) vs 32 [IQR, 24-43]; P < 0.001). Patients also reported a decrease in frequency pretreatment and posttreatment (7 [IQR, 6-10] vs 5 [IQR, 4-7]; P = -0.04), nocturia (2 [IQR, 1-3] vs 1 [IQR, 1-2]; P = 0.03), and urge urinary incontinence (2 [IQR, 1-5] vs 0 [IQR, 0-3]; P = 0.04). Consumption of alcohol decreased from week 1 to week 8 (24 oz [IQR, 12-36 oz) to 14 oz (IQR, 9-22 oz]; P = 0.02).

Conclusion: The use of a digital conversational agent effectively reduced the severity of symptoms and improved quality of life in patients with OAB.

数字会话代理在膀胱过度活动管理中的应用。
重要性:保守治疗对膀胱过度活动症(OAB)有效,但可能受到护理可及性的限制。目的:本研究的目的是评估数字会话代理(CeCe)治疗OAB的疗效。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性观察性试验,利用Renalis大学医院(俄亥俄州克利夫兰)开发的数字会话代理治疗OAB。患者接受了为期8周的CeCe治疗,并接受了如何进行膀胱训练和盆底锻炼的指导,并教授了膀胱健康知识。主要结果是从第1周到第8周,国际尿失禁咨询过度活动膀胱生活质量问卷(ICIQ OAB QoL)评分下降。患者还以相同的时间间隔完成了36项简式健康调查和广泛性焦虑症问卷,并在第1、4和8周完成了排尿日记。进行了幂分析,确定总共需要30名患者来证明使用CeCe后症状评分的显著差异,幂为80%,α误差为5%。结果:29名患者完成了所有数据收集。ICIQ OAB生活质量评分在第1周和第8周之间有显著差异(62[IQR],49-75)与32[IQR](24-43]);P<0.001)。患者还报告治疗前和治疗后的频率降低(7[IQR,6-10]vs 5[IQR,4-7];P=0.04)、夜尿症(2[IQR,1-3]vs 1[IQR,1-2];P=0.03),和急迫性尿失禁(2[IQR,1-5]vs 0[IQR,0-3];P=0.04)。从第1周到第8周,饮酒量从24 oz[IQR,12-36 oz)减少到14 oz(IQR,9-22 oz];P=0.02)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信