Comparing stroke rehabilitation inpatients and clinical trials eligibility criteria: A secondary chart review analysis revealing that most patients could have been excluded from rehabilitation trials based on comorbidity status.

Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2023-11-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565231211668
Michelle LA Nelson, Hardeep Singh, Jason Nie, Shannon MacDonald, Mark Bayley, Christian Fortin, Ross Upshur
{"title":"Comparing stroke rehabilitation inpatients and clinical trials eligibility criteria: A secondary chart review analysis revealing that most patients could have been excluded from rehabilitation trials based on comorbidity status.","authors":"Michelle LA Nelson,&nbsp;Hardeep Singh,&nbsp;Jason Nie,&nbsp;Shannon MacDonald,&nbsp;Mark Bayley,&nbsp;Christian Fortin,&nbsp;Ross Upshur","doi":"10.1177/26335565231211668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The generalizability of treatments examined in rehabilitation randomized controls trials (RCTs) partly depend on the similarity between trial subjects and a stroke rehabilitation inpatient population. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of stroke rehabilitation inpatients that would have been eligible or ineligible to participate in published stroke RCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of chart review data collected as part of an independent quality improvement initiative. Data pertaining to the characteristics of stroke rehabilitation inpatients (e.g. age, cognitive impairment, previous stroke, comorbidities) were extracted from the medical charts of patients consecutively admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit at a large urban rehabilitation hospital in Canada. Using the exclusion criteria categories of stroke RCTs identified from a systematic scoping review of 428 RCTs, we identified how many stroke rehabilitation inpatients would have been eligible or ineligible to participate in stroke RCTs based on their age, cognitive impairment, previous stroke and presence of comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 110 stroke rehabilitation inpatients were included. Twenty-four percent of patients were 80 years of age or older, 84.5% had queries or concerns regarding patient cognitive abilities, 28.0% had a previous stroke, and 31.8% had a severe stroke. Stroke rehabilitation inpatients had six comorbidities on average. Based on these factors, most stroke rehabilitation inpatients could have been excluded from stroke RCTs, with cognitive impairment the most common RCT exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes to the design of RCTs would support the development of clinical practice guidelines that reflect stroke rehabilitation inpatient characteristics, enhancing equity, diversity, and inclusion within samples and the generalizability of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"13 ","pages":"26335565231211668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565231211668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The generalizability of treatments examined in rehabilitation randomized controls trials (RCTs) partly depend on the similarity between trial subjects and a stroke rehabilitation inpatient population. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of stroke rehabilitation inpatients that would have been eligible or ineligible to participate in published stroke RCTs.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of chart review data collected as part of an independent quality improvement initiative. Data pertaining to the characteristics of stroke rehabilitation inpatients (e.g. age, cognitive impairment, previous stroke, comorbidities) were extracted from the medical charts of patients consecutively admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit at a large urban rehabilitation hospital in Canada. Using the exclusion criteria categories of stroke RCTs identified from a systematic scoping review of 428 RCTs, we identified how many stroke rehabilitation inpatients would have been eligible or ineligible to participate in stroke RCTs based on their age, cognitive impairment, previous stroke and presence of comorbidities.

Results: In total, 110 stroke rehabilitation inpatients were included. Twenty-four percent of patients were 80 years of age or older, 84.5% had queries or concerns regarding patient cognitive abilities, 28.0% had a previous stroke, and 31.8% had a severe stroke. Stroke rehabilitation inpatients had six comorbidities on average. Based on these factors, most stroke rehabilitation inpatients could have been excluded from stroke RCTs, with cognitive impairment the most common RCT exclusion criteria.

Conclusions: Changes to the design of RCTs would support the development of clinical practice guidelines that reflect stroke rehabilitation inpatient characteristics, enhancing equity, diversity, and inclusion within samples and the generalizability of results.

比较中风康复住院患者和临床试验的资格标准:一项二次图表回顾分析显示,根据合并症状况,大多数患者可能被排除在康复试验之外。
背景:康复随机对照试验(RCT)中检查的治疗方法的可推广性部分取决于试验受试者和中风康复住院人群之间的相似性。本研究的目的是确定有资格或没有资格参加已发表的中风随机对照试验的中风康复住院患者的比例。方法:这是对作为独立质量改进计划的一部分收集的图表审查数据的二次分析。从加拿大一家大型城市康复医院连续入住住院中风康复单元的患者的病历中提取与中风康复住院患者特征(如年龄、认知障碍、既往中风、合并症)相关的数据。使用从428项随机对照试验的系统范围审查中确定的卒中随机对照试验排除标准类别,我们根据年龄、认知障碍、既往卒中和合并症的存在,确定了有多少卒中康复住院患者有资格或没有资格参加卒中随机对照研究。结果:共纳入110例脑卒中康复住院患者。24%的患者年龄在80岁或以上,84.5%的患者对患者的认知能力有疑问或担忧,28.0%的患者有过中风病史,31.8%的患者有严重中风病史。中风康复住院患者平均有6种合并症。基于这些因素,大多数中风康复住院患者可能被排除在中风随机对照试验之外,认知障碍是最常见的随机对照试验排除标准。结论:随机对照试验设计的改变将有助于制定反映中风康复住院患者特征的临床实践指南,增强样本的公平性、多样性和包容性以及结果的可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信