When a pandemic and epidemic collide: Lessons learned about how system barriers can interrupt implementation of addiction research.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2023-10-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895231205890
Amanda Sharp, Melissa Carlson, Enya B Vroom, Khary Rigg, Holly Hills, Cassandra Harding, Kathleen Moore, Zev Schuman-Olivier
{"title":"When a pandemic and epidemic collide: Lessons learned about how system barriers can interrupt implementation of addiction research.","authors":"Amanda Sharp, Melissa Carlson, Enya B Vroom, Khary Rigg, Holly Hills, Cassandra Harding, Kathleen Moore, Zev Schuman-Olivier","doi":"10.1177/26334895231205890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth technologies are now featured more prominently in addiction treatment services than prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but system barriers should be carefully considered for the successful implementation of innovative remote solutions for medication management and recovery coaching support for people with opioid use disorder (OUD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded a telehealth trial prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with a multi-institution team who attempted to implement an innovative protocol during the height of the pandemic in 2020 in Tampa, Florida. The study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile device application, called <i>MySafeRx</i>, which integrated remote motivational recovery coaching with daily supervised dosing from secure pill dispensers via videoconference, on medication adherence during buprenorphine treatment. This paper provides a participant case example followed by a reflective evaluation of how the pandemic amplified both an existing research-to-practice gap and clinical system barriers during the implementation of telehealth clinical research intervention for patients with OUD.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Implementation challenges arose from academic institutional requirements, boundaries and role identity, clinical staff burnout and lack of buy-in, rigid clinical protocols, and limited clinical resources, which hampered recruitment and intervention engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the urgency for feasible and effective telehealth solutions continues to rise in response to the growing numbers of opioid-related deaths, the scientific community may use these lessons learned to re-envision the relationship between intervention implementation and the role of clinical research toward mitigating the opioid overdose epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"26334895231205890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231205890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth technologies are now featured more prominently in addiction treatment services than prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but system barriers should be carefully considered for the successful implementation of innovative remote solutions for medication management and recovery coaching support for people with opioid use disorder (OUD).

Method: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded a telehealth trial prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with a multi-institution team who attempted to implement an innovative protocol during the height of the pandemic in 2020 in Tampa, Florida. The study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile device application, called MySafeRx, which integrated remote motivational recovery coaching with daily supervised dosing from secure pill dispensers via videoconference, on medication adherence during buprenorphine treatment. This paper provides a participant case example followed by a reflective evaluation of how the pandemic amplified both an existing research-to-practice gap and clinical system barriers during the implementation of telehealth clinical research intervention for patients with OUD.

Findings: Implementation challenges arose from academic institutional requirements, boundaries and role identity, clinical staff burnout and lack of buy-in, rigid clinical protocols, and limited clinical resources, which hampered recruitment and intervention engagement.

Conclusions: As the urgency for feasible and effective telehealth solutions continues to rise in response to the growing numbers of opioid-related deaths, the scientific community may use these lessons learned to re-envision the relationship between intervention implementation and the role of clinical research toward mitigating the opioid overdose epidemic.

当大流行和流行病发生冲突时:关于系统障碍如何干扰成瘾研究的实施的经验教训。
背景:与新冠肺炎大流行之前相比,远程医疗技术现在在成瘾治疗服务中更为突出,但应仔细考虑系统障碍,以成功实施创新的远程解决方案,为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者提供药物管理和康复辅导支持。方法:美国疾病控制与预防中心在新冠肺炎大流行前资助了一项远程健康试验,该试验由一个多机构团队参与,该团队试图在2020年佛罗里达州坦帕市疫情最严重时实施一项创新方案。该研究评估了一种名为MySafeRx的移动设备应用程序对丁丙诺啡治疗期间药物依从性的有效性,该应用程序将远程动机恢复辅导与安全药丸分配器通过视频会议进行的每日监督给药相结合。本文提供了一个参与者案例示例,随后对疫情如何在对OUD患者实施远程医疗临床研究干预期间扩大现有研究与实践的差距和临床系统障碍进行了反思性评估。研究结果:实施挑战源于学术机构要求、界限和角色认同、临床工作人员倦怠和缺乏认同、严格的临床协议和有限的临床资源,这些都阻碍了招聘和干预参与。结论:随着对可行和有效的远程医疗解决方案的紧迫性不断上升,以应对阿片类药物相关死亡人数的不断增加,科学界可以利用这些经验教训来重新设想干预实施与临床研究在缓解阿片类药过量流行方面的作用之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信