Association of organizational culture and climate with variation in the clinical outcomes of collaborative care for maternal depression in community health centers.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2023-10-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895231205891
Nathaniel J Williams, Joan Russo, Melinda Vredevoogd, Tess Grover, Phillip Green, Enola Proctor, Amritha Bhat, Jürgen Unützer, Ian M Bennett
{"title":"Association of organizational culture and climate with variation in the clinical outcomes of collaborative care for maternal depression in community health centers.","authors":"Nathaniel J Williams, Joan Russo, Melinda Vredevoogd, Tess Grover, Phillip Green, Enola Proctor, Amritha Bhat, Jürgen Unützer, Ian M Bennett","doi":"10.1177/26334895231205891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Organizational factors may help explain variation in the effectiveness of evidence-based clinical innovations through implementation and sustainment. This study tested the relationship between organizational culture and climate and variation in clinical outcomes of the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of maternal depression implemented in community health centers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Organizational cultures and climates of 10 community health centers providing CoCM for depression among low-income women pregnant or parenting were assessed using the organizational social context (OSC) measure. Three-level hierarchical linear models tested whether variation in culture and climate predicted variation in improvement in depression symptoms from baseline to 6.5-month post-baseline for <i>N </i>= 468 women with care ±1 year of OSC assessment. Depression symptomology was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for patient characteristics, case mix, center size, and implementation support, patients served by centers with more proficient cultures improved significantly more from baseline to 6.5-month post-baseline than patients in centers with less proficient cultures (mean improvement = 5.08 vs. 0.14, respectively, <i>p</i> = .020), resulting in a large adjusted effect size of <i>d</i><sub>adj</sub> = 0.78. A similar effect was observed for patients served by centers with more functional climates (mean improvement = 5.25 vs. 1.12, <i>p</i> < .044, <i>d</i><sub>adj</sub> = 0.65). Growth models indicated that patients from all centers recovered on average after 4 months of care. However, those with more proficient cultures remained stabilized whereas patients served by centers with less proficient cultures deteriorated by 6.5-month post-baseline. A similar pattern was observed for functional climate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variation in clinical outcomes for women from historically underserved populations receiving <i>Collaborative Care</i> for maternal depression was associated with the organizational cultures and climates of community health centers. Implementation strategies targeting culture and climate may improve the implementation and effectiveness of integrated behavioral health care for depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231205891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Organizational factors may help explain variation in the effectiveness of evidence-based clinical innovations through implementation and sustainment. This study tested the relationship between organizational culture and climate and variation in clinical outcomes of the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of maternal depression implemented in community health centers.

Method: Organizational cultures and climates of 10 community health centers providing CoCM for depression among low-income women pregnant or parenting were assessed using the organizational social context (OSC) measure. Three-level hierarchical linear models tested whether variation in culture and climate predicted variation in improvement in depression symptoms from baseline to 6.5-month post-baseline for N = 468 women with care ±1 year of OSC assessment. Depression symptomology was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

Results: After controlling for patient characteristics, case mix, center size, and implementation support, patients served by centers with more proficient cultures improved significantly more from baseline to 6.5-month post-baseline than patients in centers with less proficient cultures (mean improvement = 5.08 vs. 0.14, respectively, p = .020), resulting in a large adjusted effect size of dadj = 0.78. A similar effect was observed for patients served by centers with more functional climates (mean improvement = 5.25 vs. 1.12, p < .044, dadj = 0.65). Growth models indicated that patients from all centers recovered on average after 4 months of care. However, those with more proficient cultures remained stabilized whereas patients served by centers with less proficient cultures deteriorated by 6.5-month post-baseline. A similar pattern was observed for functional climate.

Conclusions: Variation in clinical outcomes for women from historically underserved populations receiving Collaborative Care for maternal depression was associated with the organizational cultures and climates of community health centers. Implementation strategies targeting culture and climate may improve the implementation and effectiveness of integrated behavioral health care for depression.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

组织文化和氛围与社区卫生中心合作护理孕产妇抑郁症临床结果变化的关系。
背景:组织因素可能有助于解释循证临床创新通过实施和维持的有效性变化。本研究测试了组织文化和气候之间的关系,以及在社区卫生中心实施的合作护理模式(CoCM)治疗孕产妇抑郁症的临床结果变化。方法:采用组织社会情境(OSC)测量方法,对10个社区卫生中心的组织文化和氛围进行评估,这些中心为低收入孕妇或父母提供CoCM治疗抑郁症。三级分层线性模型测试了文化和气候的变化是否预测了从基线到基线后6.5个月N抑郁症状改善的变化 = 468名接受护理的妇女±1年的OSC评估。使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)测量抑郁症状。结果:在控制了患者特征、病例组合、中心规模和实施支持后,由文化水平较高的中心服务的患者从基线到基线后6.5个月的改善显著高于文化水平较低的中心的患者(平均改善 = 分别为5.08和0.14 = .020),导致dadj的较大调整效果大小 = 0.78。对于由功能性更强的气候中心服务的患者,也观察到了类似的效果(平均改善 = 5.25对1.12,p dadj = 0.65)。生长模型表明,来自所有中心的患者在4个月的护理后平均康复。然而,那些具有更熟练文化的患者保持稳定,而由具有不熟练文化的中心服务的患者在基线后6.5个月病情恶化。在功能性气候中也观察到了类似的模式。结论:接受产妇抑郁症协作护理的历史上服务不足人群中女性的临床结果差异与社区卫生中心的组织文化和氛围有关。针对文化和气候的实施策略可以提高抑郁症综合行为健康护理的实施和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信