Enzymatic tissue processing after testicular biopsy in non-obstructive azoospermia enhances sperm retrieval.

IF 8.3 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human reproduction open Pub Date : 2023-10-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/hropen/hoad039
V Vloeberghs, N De Munck, A Racca, I Mateizel, K Wouters, H Tournaye
{"title":"Enzymatic tissue processing after testicular biopsy in non-obstructive azoospermia enhances sperm retrieval.","authors":"V Vloeberghs, N De Munck, A Racca, I Mateizel, K Wouters, H Tournaye","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoad039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>What is the added value of enzymatic processing of testicular biopsies on testicular sperm retrieval (SR) rates for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA)?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>In addition to mechanical mincing, enzymatic digestion increased SR rates in testicular biopsies of NOA patients.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Many studies focus on the surgical approach to optimize recovery of testicular sperm in NOA, and in spite of that, controversy still exists about whether the type of surgery makes any difference as long as multiple biopsies are taken. Few studies, however, focus on the role of the IVF laboratory and the benefit of additional lab procedures, e.g. enzymatic digestion, in order to optimize SR rates.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>This retrospective single-center cohort study included all patients who underwent their first testicular sperm extraction (TESE) by open multiple-biopsy method between January 2004 and July 2022. Only patients with a normal karyotype, absence of Y-q deletions and a diagnosis of NOA based on histology were included. The primary outcome was SR rate after mincing and/or enzymes. The secondary outcome was cumulative live birth (CLB) after ICSI with fresh TESE and subsequent ICSI cycles with frozen TESE.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>Multiple biopsies were obtained from the testis, unilaterally or bilaterally, on the day of oocyte retrieval. Upon mechanical mincing, biopsies were investigated for 30 min; when no or insufficient numbers of spermatozoa were observed, enzymatic treatment was performed using Collagenase type IV. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to predict CLB per TESE by adjusting for the following confounding factors: male FSH level, female age, and requirement of enzymatic digestion to find sperm.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>We included 118 patients, of whom 72 (61.0%) had successful SR eventually. Spermatozoa were retrieved after mechanical mincing for 28 patients (23.7%; 28/118) or after additional enzymatic digestion for another 44 patients (37.2%; 44/118). Thus, of the 90 patients requiring enzymatic digestion, sperm were retrieved for 44 (48.9%). Male characteristics were not different between patients with SR after mincing or enzymatic digestion, in regard to mean age (34.5 vs 34.5 years), testis volume (10.2 vs 10.6 ml), FSH (17.8 vs 16.9 IU/l), cryptorchidism (21.4 vs 34.1%), varicocele (3.6 vs 4.6%), or histological diagnosis (Sertoli-cell only 53.6 vs 47.7%, maturation arrest 21.4 vs 38.6%, sclerosis/atrophy 25.0 vs 13.6%).Of the 72 patients with sperm available for ICSI, 23/72 (31.9%) achieved a live birth (LB) after the injection with fresh testicular sperm (and fresh or frozen embryo transfers). Of the remaining 49 patients without LB, 34 (69.4%) had supernumerary testicular sperm frozen. Of these 34 patients, 19 (55.9%) continued ICSI with frozen testicular sperm, and 9/19 (47.4%) had achieved an LB after ICSI with frozen testicular sperm. Thus, the total CLB was 32/118 (27.1%) per TESE or 32/72 (44.4%) per TESE with sperm retrieved.Of the female characteristics (couples with sperm available), only female age (30.3 vs 32.7 years; <i>P</i> = 0.042) was significantly lower in the group with a LB, compared to those without.The CLB with testicular sperm obtained after enzymatic digestion was 31.8% (14/44), while the CLB with sperm obtained after mincing alone was 64.3% (18/28). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that when enzymatic digestion was required, it was associated with a significant decrease in CLB per TESE (OR: 0.23 (0.08-0.7); <i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>Limitations of the study are related to the retrospective design. However, the selection of only patients with NOA, and specific characteristics (normal karyotype and absence Y-q deletion) and having their first TESE, strengthens our findings.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>Enzymatic processing increases the SR rate from testicular biopsies of NOA patients compared to mechanical mincing only, demonstrating the importance of an appropriate laboratory protocol. However, NOA patients should be counseled that when sperm have been found after enzymatic digestion, their chances to father a genetically own child may be lower compared to those not requiring enzymatic digestion.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>None reported.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":"2023 4","pages":"hoad039"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: What is the added value of enzymatic processing of testicular biopsies on testicular sperm retrieval (SR) rates for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA)?

Summary answer: In addition to mechanical mincing, enzymatic digestion increased SR rates in testicular biopsies of NOA patients.

What is known already: Many studies focus on the surgical approach to optimize recovery of testicular sperm in NOA, and in spite of that, controversy still exists about whether the type of surgery makes any difference as long as multiple biopsies are taken. Few studies, however, focus on the role of the IVF laboratory and the benefit of additional lab procedures, e.g. enzymatic digestion, in order to optimize SR rates.

Study design size duration: This retrospective single-center cohort study included all patients who underwent their first testicular sperm extraction (TESE) by open multiple-biopsy method between January 2004 and July 2022. Only patients with a normal karyotype, absence of Y-q deletions and a diagnosis of NOA based on histology were included. The primary outcome was SR rate after mincing and/or enzymes. The secondary outcome was cumulative live birth (CLB) after ICSI with fresh TESE and subsequent ICSI cycles with frozen TESE.

Participants/materials setting methods: Multiple biopsies were obtained from the testis, unilaterally or bilaterally, on the day of oocyte retrieval. Upon mechanical mincing, biopsies were investigated for 30 min; when no or insufficient numbers of spermatozoa were observed, enzymatic treatment was performed using Collagenase type IV. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to predict CLB per TESE by adjusting for the following confounding factors: male FSH level, female age, and requirement of enzymatic digestion to find sperm.

Main results and the role of chance: We included 118 patients, of whom 72 (61.0%) had successful SR eventually. Spermatozoa were retrieved after mechanical mincing for 28 patients (23.7%; 28/118) or after additional enzymatic digestion for another 44 patients (37.2%; 44/118). Thus, of the 90 patients requiring enzymatic digestion, sperm were retrieved for 44 (48.9%). Male characteristics were not different between patients with SR after mincing or enzymatic digestion, in regard to mean age (34.5 vs 34.5 years), testis volume (10.2 vs 10.6 ml), FSH (17.8 vs 16.9 IU/l), cryptorchidism (21.4 vs 34.1%), varicocele (3.6 vs 4.6%), or histological diagnosis (Sertoli-cell only 53.6 vs 47.7%, maturation arrest 21.4 vs 38.6%, sclerosis/atrophy 25.0 vs 13.6%).Of the 72 patients with sperm available for ICSI, 23/72 (31.9%) achieved a live birth (LB) after the injection with fresh testicular sperm (and fresh or frozen embryo transfers). Of the remaining 49 patients without LB, 34 (69.4%) had supernumerary testicular sperm frozen. Of these 34 patients, 19 (55.9%) continued ICSI with frozen testicular sperm, and 9/19 (47.4%) had achieved an LB after ICSI with frozen testicular sperm. Thus, the total CLB was 32/118 (27.1%) per TESE or 32/72 (44.4%) per TESE with sperm retrieved.Of the female characteristics (couples with sperm available), only female age (30.3 vs 32.7 years; P = 0.042) was significantly lower in the group with a LB, compared to those without.The CLB with testicular sperm obtained after enzymatic digestion was 31.8% (14/44), while the CLB with sperm obtained after mincing alone was 64.3% (18/28). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that when enzymatic digestion was required, it was associated with a significant decrease in CLB per TESE (OR: 0.23 (0.08-0.7); P = 0.01).

Limitations reasons for caution: Limitations of the study are related to the retrospective design. However, the selection of only patients with NOA, and specific characteristics (normal karyotype and absence Y-q deletion) and having their first TESE, strengthens our findings.

Wider implications of the findings: Enzymatic processing increases the SR rate from testicular biopsies of NOA patients compared to mechanical mincing only, demonstrating the importance of an appropriate laboratory protocol. However, NOA patients should be counseled that when sperm have been found after enzymatic digestion, their chances to father a genetically own child may be lower compared to those not requiring enzymatic digestion.

Study funding/competing interests: None reported.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非梗阻性无精子症睾丸活检后的酶组织处理增强了精子回收。
研究问题:对于非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)患者,睾丸活检的酶处理对睾丸精子回收率(SR)的附加值是什么?简要回答:除了机械切碎外,酶消化还增加了NOA患者睾丸活检的SR率。已知情况:许多研究都集中在优化NOA中睾丸精子回收的手术方法上,尽管如此,关于只要进行多次活检,手术类型是否有任何不同,仍然存在争议。然而,很少有研究关注试管婴儿实验室的作用和额外实验室程序的好处,例如酶消化,以优化SR率。研究设计规模持续时间:这项回顾性单中心队列研究包括2004年1月至2022年7月期间通过开放式多次活检方法首次进行睾丸精子提取(TESE)的所有患者。仅包括核型正常、Y-q缺失缺失和根据组织学诊断为NOA的患者。主要结果是切碎和/或酶切后的SR率。次要结果是新鲜TESE ICSI后的累积活产(CLB),以及冷冻TESE的后续ICSI周期。参与者/材料设置方法:在取卵当天,从睾丸单侧或双侧进行多次活检。在机械切碎后,对30例患者进行了活检 min;当没有观察到精子数量或精子数量不足时,使用Ⅳ型胶原酶进行酶处理。通过调整以下混杂因素,进行多变量回归分析,预测每次TESE的CLB:男性FSH水平、女性年龄和酶消化寻找精子的要求。主要结果和机会的作用:我们纳入了118名患者,其中72人(61.0%)最终成功SR。28名患者(23.7%;28/118)在机械切碎后或另外44名患者(37.2%;44/118)在额外的酶消化后回收精子。因此,在90名需要酶消化的患者中,有44名(48.9%)获得了精子。在平均年龄方面,切碎或酶消化后的SR患者的男性特征没有差异(34.5 vs 34.5 年),睾丸体积(10.2 vs 10.6 ml)、FSH(17.8 vs 16.9 IU/l)、隐睾(21.4 vs 34.1%)、精索静脉曲张(3.6 vs 4.6%)或组织学诊断(支持细胞仅53.6 vs 47.7%,成熟停滞21.4 vs 38.6%,硬化/萎缩25.0 vs 13.6%)。在72名可用于ICSI的精子患者中,23/72(31.9%)在注射新鲜睾丸精子(以及新鲜或冷冻胚胎移植)后实现活产(LB)。在剩下的49名没有LB的患者中,34名(69.4%)的睾丸精子冷冻过多。在这34名患者中,19名(55.9%)患者使用冷冻睾丸精子继续进行ICSI,9/19名(47.4%)患者在使用冷冻睾丸精液进行ICSI后获得LB。因此,在回收精子的情况下,每次TESE的总CLB为32/118(27.1%),或每次TESE为32/72(44.4%)。在女性特征(有精子的夫妇)中,只有女性年龄(30.3比32.7 年;P = 0.042)在具有LB的组中显著低于没有LB的组。酶消化后获得的睾丸精子的CLB为31.8%(14/44),而单独切碎后获得的精子CLB为64.3%(18/28)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,当需要酶消化时,每TESE的CLB显著降低(OR:0.23(0.08-0.7);P = 0.01)。注意的局限性原因:研究的局限性与回顾性设计有关。然而,仅选择具有NOA和特定特征(正常核型和缺失Y-q缺失)的患者,并首次进行TESE,加强了我们的研究结果。研究结果的更广泛含义:与仅机械切碎相比,酶处理提高了NOA患者睾丸活检的SR率,证明了适当的实验室方案的重要性。然而,NOA患者应该被告知,当在酶消化后发现精子时,与那些不需要酶消化的患者相比,他们生下自己基因孩子的机会可能更低。研究资金/竞争利益:无报告。试用注册号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信