Understanding rural-urban differences in veterans’ internet access, use and patient preferences for telemedicine

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amy M. J. O'Shea PhD, Mikayla Gibson  , James Merchant MS, Kelby Rewerts BS, Kelly Miell PhD, Peter J. Kaboli MD, Stephanie L. Shimada PhD
{"title":"Understanding rural-urban differences in veterans’ internet access, use and patient preferences for telemedicine","authors":"Amy M. J. O'Shea PhD,&nbsp;Mikayla Gibson  ,&nbsp;James Merchant MS,&nbsp;Kelby Rewerts BS,&nbsp;Kelly Miell PhD,&nbsp;Peter J. Kaboli MD,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Shimada PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The expansion of telemedicine (e.g., telephone or video) in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) raises concerns for health care disparities between rural and urban veterans. Factors impeding telemedicine use (e.g., broadband, digital literacy, age) disproportionally affect rural veterans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To examine veteran-reported broadband access, internet use, familiarity with, and preferences for telemedicine stratified by residential rurality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred fifty veterans with a VA primary care visit in March 2022 completed a 30-min computer-assisted telephone interview. The sampling design stratified veterans by residential rurality (i.e., rural or urban) and how primary care was delivered (i.e., in-person or by video). Counts and weighted percentages are reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>After accounting for survey weights, 96.2% of respondents had in-home internet access and 89.5% reported functional connection speeds. However, rural- compared to urban-residing veterans were less likely to experience a telemedicine visit in the past year (74.1% vs. 85.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). When comparing telemedicine to in-person visits, rural versus urban-residing veterans rated them not as good (45.3% vs. 36.8%), just as good (51.1% vs. 53.1%), or better (3.5% vs. 10.0%) (<i>p</i> = 0.05). To make telemedicine visits easier, veterans, regardless of where they lived, recommended technology training (46.4%), help accessing the internet (26.1%), or provision of an internet-enabled device (25.9%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Though rural-residing veterans were less likely to experience a telemedicine visit, the same actionable facilitators to improve telemedicine access were reported regardless of residential rurality. Importantly, technology training was most often recommended. Policy makers, patient advocates, and other stakeholders should consider novel initiatives to provide training resources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12805","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The expansion of telemedicine (e.g., telephone or video) in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) raises concerns for health care disparities between rural and urban veterans. Factors impeding telemedicine use (e.g., broadband, digital literacy, age) disproportionally affect rural veterans.

Purpose

To examine veteran-reported broadband access, internet use, familiarity with, and preferences for telemedicine stratified by residential rurality.

Methods

Three hundred fifty veterans with a VA primary care visit in March 2022 completed a 30-min computer-assisted telephone interview. The sampling design stratified veterans by residential rurality (i.e., rural or urban) and how primary care was delivered (i.e., in-person or by video). Counts and weighted percentages are reported.

Findings

After accounting for survey weights, 96.2% of respondents had in-home internet access and 89.5% reported functional connection speeds. However, rural- compared to urban-residing veterans were less likely to experience a telemedicine visit in the past year (74.1% vs. 85.2%; p = 0.02). When comparing telemedicine to in-person visits, rural versus urban-residing veterans rated them not as good (45.3% vs. 36.8%), just as good (51.1% vs. 53.1%), or better (3.5% vs. 10.0%) (p = 0.05). To make telemedicine visits easier, veterans, regardless of where they lived, recommended technology training (46.4%), help accessing the internet (26.1%), or provision of an internet-enabled device (25.9%).

Conclusions

Though rural-residing veterans were less likely to experience a telemedicine visit, the same actionable facilitators to improve telemedicine access were reported regardless of residential rurality. Importantly, technology training was most often recommended. Policy makers, patient advocates, and other stakeholders should consider novel initiatives to provide training resources.

Abstract Image

了解退伍军人互联网接入、使用和患者远程医疗偏好方面的城乡差异。
背景:退伍军人健康管理局(VA)远程医疗(如电话或视频)的扩大引起了人们对农村和城市退伍军人之间医疗保健差距的担忧。阻碍远程医疗使用的因素(如宽带、数字扫盲、年龄)对农村退伍军人的影响不成比例。目的:调查退伍军人报告的宽带接入、互联网使用、对远程医疗的熟悉程度和偏好,并按农村居民进行分层。方法:2022年3月,350名退伍军人接受了退伍军人事务部初级保健访问,完成了30分钟的计算机辅助电话采访。抽样设计按居住的农村(即农村或城市)和初级保健的提供方式(即亲自或通过视频)对退伍军人进行分层。报告计数和加权百分比。调查结果:考虑到调查权重后,96.2%的受访者有家庭互联网接入,89.5%的受访者报告了功能连接速度。然而,与城市居民相比,农村居民退伍军人在过去一年中体验远程医疗的可能性较小(74.1%对85.2%;p=0.02)。当将远程医疗与面对面访问进行比较时,农村居民和城市居民退伍军人对远程医疗的评价不那么好(45.3%对36.8%)、一样好(51.1%对53.1%)或更好(3.5%对10.0%)(p=0.05),无论他们住在哪里,都建议进行技术培训(46.4%)、帮助访问互联网(26.1%)或提供互联网设备(25.9%)。结论:尽管居住在农村的退伍军人不太可能经历远程医疗访问,但据报道,无论居住在农村,都有同样可行的促进措施来改善远程医疗访问。重要的是,经常建议进行技术培训。政策制定者、患者权益倡导者和其他利益相关者应考虑提供培训资源的新举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信