Mercy A Agtuahene, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Kwakye
{"title":"Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.","authors":"Mercy A Agtuahene, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Kwakye","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired <i>t</i>-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (<i>r</i> = 0.492; <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (<i>r</i> = 0.290; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (<i>r</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.982).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"79 1","pages":"1923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.
Objectives: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.
Method: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m2 (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982).
Conclusion: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.
Clinical implications: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.