A Broad Examination of Mental Health Literacy Among College Students in the United States.

Q2 Medicine
Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20231023-01
Susan M Hannan, Tony T Wells
{"title":"A Broad Examination of Mental Health Literacy Among College Students in the United States.","authors":"Susan M Hannan, Tony T Wells","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20231023-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High levels of mental health literacy (MHL) have been linked to the ability to correctly recognize certain problems as mental health issues, which then may lead to effective help-seeking behaviors. Most research on MHL has focused on a limited number of psychiatric diagnoses, using Australian samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate various components of MHL in a large sample of undergraduate students in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a vignette-based study with 843 undergraduate students. Six psychiatric diagnoses (and two \"non-disordered\" scenarios) were represented in distinct vignettes. Participants rated the severity of each vignette character's problem, the helpfulness of numerous treatment options, and the likelihood that different etiological factors contributed to the character's problem.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Across all clinical vignettes, therapy/counseling was perceived to be the most helpful treatment. Participants rated \"personal weakness/lack of willpower\" as contributing the most to the alcohol use disorder (AUD) character's problems. Our hypothesis related to how perceptions of etiology may impact participants' perceptions of different types of treatment was partially supported for the depression character. When participants described the depression character as having a \"psychological/mental health problem,\" they were more likely to perceive therapy/counseling as being helpful compared to medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants recognized most of the psychiatric diagnoses as a mental health problem, acknowledged the seriousness of the presenting problems, and recommended effective help-seeking behavior. However, undergraduate U.S. students could benefit from increased MHL specifically related to AUD. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2023;7(4):e207-e214.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"7 4","pages":"e207-e214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20231023-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High levels of mental health literacy (MHL) have been linked to the ability to correctly recognize certain problems as mental health issues, which then may lead to effective help-seeking behaviors. Most research on MHL has focused on a limited number of psychiatric diagnoses, using Australian samples.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate various components of MHL in a large sample of undergraduate students in the United States.

Methods: We conducted a vignette-based study with 843 undergraduate students. Six psychiatric diagnoses (and two "non-disordered" scenarios) were represented in distinct vignettes. Participants rated the severity of each vignette character's problem, the helpfulness of numerous treatment options, and the likelihood that different etiological factors contributed to the character's problem.

Key results: Across all clinical vignettes, therapy/counseling was perceived to be the most helpful treatment. Participants rated "personal weakness/lack of willpower" as contributing the most to the alcohol use disorder (AUD) character's problems. Our hypothesis related to how perceptions of etiology may impact participants' perceptions of different types of treatment was partially supported for the depression character. When participants described the depression character as having a "psychological/mental health problem," they were more likely to perceive therapy/counseling as being helpful compared to medication.

Conclusions: Participants recognized most of the psychiatric diagnoses as a mental health problem, acknowledged the seriousness of the presenting problems, and recommended effective help-seeking behavior. However, undergraduate U.S. students could benefit from increased MHL specifically related to AUD. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(4):e207-e214.].

美国大学生心理健康素养的广泛调查。
背景:高水平的心理健康素养(MHL)与正确识别某些问题为心理健康问题的能力有关,从而可能导致有效的求助行为。大多数关于MHL的研究都集中在有限数量的精神病诊断上,使用了澳大利亚的样本。目的:本研究旨在调查美国大学生MHL的各种成分。方法:我们对843名大学生进行了一项基于小插曲的研究。六种精神病诊断(以及两种“非紊乱”情况)以不同的小插曲呈现。参与者对每个小插曲角色问题的严重程度、多种治疗方案的有用性以及不同病因导致角色问题的可能性进行了评分。关键结果:在所有临床小插曲中,治疗/咨询被认为是最有帮助的治疗方法。参与者认为“个人弱点/缺乏意志力”是导致酒精使用障碍(AUD)角色问题的最大原因。我们关于病因认知如何影响参与者对不同类型治疗的认知的假设部分支持了抑郁症的特征。当参与者将抑郁症描述为“心理/心理健康问题”时,他们更有可能认为治疗/咨询与药物相比是有帮助的。结论:参与者认识到大多数精神病诊断是一个心理健康问题,承认问题的严重性,并建议采取有效的求助行为。然而,美国本科生可以从与AUD相关的MHL增加中受益。[HLRP:健康素养研究与实践。2023;7(4):e207-e214]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信