The Impact of Electromagnetic Interference from Charging All-electric Vehicles on Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Performance.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Pub Date : 2023-10-15 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.19102/icrm.2023.14102
Abdul Wase, Umbreen Azmat Hussain, Theresa Ratajczak, Thein Tun Aung, Omair Ali, Ronald J Markert
{"title":"The Impact of Electromagnetic Interference from Charging All-electric Vehicles on Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Performance.","authors":"Abdul Wase,&nbsp;Umbreen Azmat Hussain,&nbsp;Theresa Ratajczak,&nbsp;Thein Tun Aung,&nbsp;Omair Ali,&nbsp;Ronald J Markert","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2023.14102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electric vehicles (EVs) are growing in popularity and in general use. The effect of electromagnetic interference (EMI) caused by supercharging all-electric vehicles on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) function has not been studied. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of the effect of EMI from charging Tesla all-electric vehicles (Tesla, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) on cardiac implantable electronic device function. A proof-of-concept study was performed to explore the potential effect of EMI from Tesla vehicles while charging the battery using a 220-V wall charger and a 480-V Supercharger. Tesla Model S and Model X vehicles were used for this study. We enrolled 34 patients with stable ICD function for the initial phase using the standard wall charger, followed by an additional 35 patients for the second phase using the Supercharger. Tracings were obtained at nominal and highest sensitivity settings while patients sat in the driver's seat, passenger seat, back seats, and facing the charging port. In each position, the device and the patient were monitored in real time by a certified technician for any inappropriate sensing and/or delivery of therapies. A medical magnet was also available on site. Emergency medical services and physician supervision were available at all times, and patients were contacted the following day to ensure their well-being. No device interactions were identified at both the nominal and highest sensitivity settings of each ICD during exposure to vehicle charging using a Tesla 220-V wall charger and a 480-V Supercharger at any of the five positions in and around each vehicle. Interaction was defined as oversensing, undersensing, mode switch, or upper rate tracking behavior. There was also no damage to any ICD, and no inappropriate shocks were administered to any patient. In conclusion, transvenous ICD function is not interrupted by EMI transmitted while charging Tesla vehicles using either the 220-V wall charger or the 480-V Supercharger.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"14 10","pages":"5600-5604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2023.14102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are growing in popularity and in general use. The effect of electromagnetic interference (EMI) caused by supercharging all-electric vehicles on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) function has not been studied. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of the effect of EMI from charging Tesla all-electric vehicles (Tesla, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) on cardiac implantable electronic device function. A proof-of-concept study was performed to explore the potential effect of EMI from Tesla vehicles while charging the battery using a 220-V wall charger and a 480-V Supercharger. Tesla Model S and Model X vehicles were used for this study. We enrolled 34 patients with stable ICD function for the initial phase using the standard wall charger, followed by an additional 35 patients for the second phase using the Supercharger. Tracings were obtained at nominal and highest sensitivity settings while patients sat in the driver's seat, passenger seat, back seats, and facing the charging port. In each position, the device and the patient were monitored in real time by a certified technician for any inappropriate sensing and/or delivery of therapies. A medical magnet was also available on site. Emergency medical services and physician supervision were available at all times, and patients were contacted the following day to ensure their well-being. No device interactions were identified at both the nominal and highest sensitivity settings of each ICD during exposure to vehicle charging using a Tesla 220-V wall charger and a 480-V Supercharger at any of the five positions in and around each vehicle. Interaction was defined as oversensing, undersensing, mode switch, or upper rate tracking behavior. There was also no damage to any ICD, and no inappropriate shocks were administered to any patient. In conclusion, transvenous ICD function is not interrupted by EMI transmitted while charging Tesla vehicles using either the 220-V wall charger or the 480-V Supercharger.

Abstract Image

全电动汽车充电产生的电磁干扰对植入式心脏复律除颤器性能的影响。
电动汽车(EV)越来越受欢迎和普遍使用。全电动汽车增压引起的电磁干扰(EMI)对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)功能的影响尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是确定特斯拉全电动汽车(美国得克萨斯州奥斯汀股份有限公司特斯拉)充电产生的EMI对心脏植入式电子设备功能的影响程度。进行了一项概念验证研究,以探索特斯拉汽车在使用220V壁式充电器和480V增压器为电池充电时产生的EMI的潜在影响。本研究使用了特斯拉Model S和Model X汽车。我们招募了34名使用标准壁式充电器的ICD功能稳定的患者进入初始阶段,随后又招募了35名使用增压器的患者进入第二阶段。当患者坐在驾驶座、乘客座、后座并面对充电口时,在标称和最高灵敏度设置下进行气管插管。在每个位置,由认证技术人员实时监测设备和患者是否有任何不适当的传感和/或治疗。现场还提供了医用磁铁。紧急医疗服务和医生监督随时可用,第二天联系患者以确保他们的健康。在使用特斯拉220-V壁式充电器和480-V增压器在每辆车内和周围的五个位置中的任何一个位置进行车辆充电期间,在每个ICD的标称和最高灵敏度设置下都没有发现设备交互。交互被定义为过度感知、感知不足、模式切换或高速率跟踪行为。ICD也没有受损,也没有对任何患者进行不适当的电击。总之,在使用220伏壁式充电器或480伏增压器为特斯拉汽车充电时,经静脉ICD功能不会被传输的EMI干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信