Ezequiel J. Alba-Posse , Carlos David Bruque , Yamila Gándola , Javier Gasulla , Alejandro D. Nadra
{"title":"From in-silico screening to in-vitro evaluation: Enhancing the detection of Microcystins with engineered PP1 mutant variants","authors":"Ezequiel J. Alba-Posse , Carlos David Bruque , Yamila Gándola , Javier Gasulla , Alejandro D. Nadra","doi":"10.1016/j.jsb.2023.108043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cyanotoxins produced during harmful algal blooms (CyanoHABs) have become a worldwide issue of concern. Microcystins (MC) are the most ubiquitous group of cyanotoxins and have known carcinogenic and hepatotoxic effects. The protein phosphatase inhibition assays (PPIAs), based on the inhibition of Protein Phosphatase 1/2A (PP1/PP2A) by MC, are one of the most cost-effective options for detecting MC. In this work, we aimed to design <em>in-silico</em> and evaluate <em>in-vitro</em> mutant variants of the PP1 protein, in order to enhance their capabilities as a MC biosensor.</p><p>To this end, we performed an <em>in-silico</em> active site-saturated mutagenesis screening, followed by stability and docking affinity calculation with the MCLR cyanotoxin. Candidates with improved both affinity and stability were further tested in a fully flexible active-site docking. The best-scored mutations (19) were individually analysed regarding their locations and interactions. Four of them (p.D197F; p.Q249Y; p.S129W; p.D220Q) were selected for <em>in-vitro</em> expression and evaluation. Mutant p.D197F, exhibited a significant increment in inhibition by MCLR with respect to the WT, while showing a non-significant difference in stability nor activity. This successful PP1 inhibition enhancement suggests the potential of the p.D197F variant for practical MC detection applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of structural biology","volume":"215 4","pages":"Article 108043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847723001065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cyanotoxins produced during harmful algal blooms (CyanoHABs) have become a worldwide issue of concern. Microcystins (MC) are the most ubiquitous group of cyanotoxins and have known carcinogenic and hepatotoxic effects. The protein phosphatase inhibition assays (PPIAs), based on the inhibition of Protein Phosphatase 1/2A (PP1/PP2A) by MC, are one of the most cost-effective options for detecting MC. In this work, we aimed to design in-silico and evaluate in-vitro mutant variants of the PP1 protein, in order to enhance their capabilities as a MC biosensor.
To this end, we performed an in-silico active site-saturated mutagenesis screening, followed by stability and docking affinity calculation with the MCLR cyanotoxin. Candidates with improved both affinity and stability were further tested in a fully flexible active-site docking. The best-scored mutations (19) were individually analysed regarding their locations and interactions. Four of them (p.D197F; p.Q249Y; p.S129W; p.D220Q) were selected for in-vitro expression and evaluation. Mutant p.D197F, exhibited a significant increment in inhibition by MCLR with respect to the WT, while showing a non-significant difference in stability nor activity. This successful PP1 inhibition enhancement suggests the potential of the p.D197F variant for practical MC detection applications.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Structural Biology (JSB) has an open access mirror journal, the Journal of Structural Biology: X (JSBX), sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Since both journals share the same editorial system, you may submit your manuscript via either journal homepage. You will be prompted during submission (and revision) to choose in which to publish your article. The editors and reviewers are not aware of the choice you made until the article has been published online. JSB and JSBX publish papers dealing with the structural analysis of living material at every level of organization by all methods that lead to an understanding of biological function in terms of molecular and supermolecular structure.
Techniques covered include:
• Light microscopy including confocal microscopy
• All types of electron microscopy
• X-ray diffraction
• Nuclear magnetic resonance
• Scanning force microscopy, scanning probe microscopy, and tunneling microscopy
• Digital image processing
• Computational insights into structure