Optimizing antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies in acute leukemia patients: Assessing the efficacy of fluconazole.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1177/10781552231212204
Nicholas S Teran, Grace S Park
{"title":"Optimizing antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies in acute leukemia patients: Assessing the efficacy of fluconazole.","authors":"Nicholas S Teran, Grace S Park","doi":"10.1177/10781552231212204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myeloid (AML) and promyelocytic (APL) leukemia patients are at high risk for infection and mortality. While guidance for infection prevention is provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), each institution may vary in antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing practices. The discrepancy may be explained by medication intolerance, cost, and low incidence of mold infections in leukemia patients. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated mortality benefits with the use of posaconazole, which was adopted by the NCCN. Despite known risks, it is unclear whether universal mold-active coverage is indicated for all AML and APL patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence of breakthrough infections in AML and APL patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of AML and APL patients receiving induction therapy at Baylor St Luke's Medical Center (BSLMC) between January 2019 and October 2021. The primary outcome assessed the incidence of breakthrough infections. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 patients were included and 54 (98%) had prolonged neutropenia with a median duration of 30 days. Five patients (9.3%) experienced breakthrough infections during induction while 21 individuals (38.9%) during the follow-up period. <i>Aspergillus</i> infections occurred in three patients receiving nonmold coverage compared to none on mold-active agents (p = 1.0) with no statistical difference in mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the majority of patients not receiving mold-active prophylaxis, nonmold-active prophylaxis may be sufficient with consideration of low aspergillosis incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1330-1334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231212204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute myeloid (AML) and promyelocytic (APL) leukemia patients are at high risk for infection and mortality. While guidance for infection prevention is provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), each institution may vary in antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing practices. The discrepancy may be explained by medication intolerance, cost, and low incidence of mold infections in leukemia patients. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated mortality benefits with the use of posaconazole, which was adopted by the NCCN. Despite known risks, it is unclear whether universal mold-active coverage is indicated for all AML and APL patients.

Objective: To assess the incidence of breakthrough infections in AML and APL patients.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of AML and APL patients receiving induction therapy at Baylor St Luke's Medical Center (BSLMC) between January 2019 and October 2021. The primary outcome assessed the incidence of breakthrough infections. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.

Results: A total of 55 patients were included and 54 (98%) had prolonged neutropenia with a median duration of 30 days. Five patients (9.3%) experienced breakthrough infections during induction while 21 individuals (38.9%) during the follow-up period. Aspergillus infections occurred in three patients receiving nonmold coverage compared to none on mold-active agents (p = 1.0) with no statistical difference in mortality.

Conclusion: Despite the majority of patients not receiving mold-active prophylaxis, nonmold-active prophylaxis may be sufficient with consideration of low aspergillosis incidence.

急性白血病患者抗菌预防策略的优化:氟康唑疗效评估。
背景:急性髓细胞白血病(AML)和早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)患者感染和死亡的风险很高。虽然美国癌症综合网络(NCCN)和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)提供了感染预防指南,但每个机构的抗菌预防处方实践可能有所不同。这种差异可能是由白血病患者的药物不耐受、费用和霉菌感染的低发病率造成的。最近的一项荟萃分析显示,使用NCCN采用的泊沙康唑对死亡率有好处。尽管存在已知风险,但尚不清楚是否适用于所有AML和APL患者的通用霉菌活性保险。目的:评估AML和APL患者突破性感染的发生率。方法:这是对2019年1月至2021年10月在贝勒圣卢克医疗中心(BSLMC)接受诱导治疗的AML和APL患者的单中心回顾性图表回顾。主要结果评估了突破性感染的发生率。描述性统计被用来总结数据。结果:共纳入55名患者,其中54名(98%)出现中位持续时间为30天的长期中性粒细胞减少症。5名患者(9.3%)在诱导期间经历了突破性感染,21名患者(38.9%)在随访期间经历了感染。三名接受非霉菌覆盖的患者发生曲霉菌感染,而使用霉菌活性剂的患者则没有(p = 1.0),死亡率无统计学差异。结论:尽管大多数患者没有接受霉菌主动预防,但考虑到曲霉菌病的发病率较低,非霉菌主动预防可能就足够了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信