Applying Computer-Based Language Test to Young Children.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1159/000534726
Yunyi Hu, Kathy Yuet-Sheung Lee, Tammy Hui Mei Lau, Wilson Shing Yu, Michael C F Tong, Iris H-Y Ng, Thomas Law
{"title":"Applying Computer-Based Language Test to Young Children.","authors":"Yunyi Hu, Kathy Yuet-Sheung Lee, Tammy Hui Mei Lau, Wilson Shing Yu, Michael C F Tong, Iris H-Y Ng, Thomas Law","doi":"10.1159/000534726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed at exploring the feasibility of applying a computer-based language test to young children aged 2-4 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two Cantonese-speaking children, aged 2-4 years, were recruited from local kindergartens. All participants underwent an assessment using both the computer-based and paper-pencil versions of the Macau Cantonese Language Screening Scale for Preschool Children, following a crossover study design. A short break of 15-30 min was provided between the two assessments. The data were analysed at three levels: the overall test, subcategory, and individual item levels. At the overall test and subcategory levels, data were analysed using the paired samples t-test and ICC. At the item level, the percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa value were selected to assess the agreement of the two test formats.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Excellent agreement was found for the overall test level, and good agreement was observed for four of the five subcategories. At the individual item level, 28 of the 35 items showed more than 80% agreement, and 16 items showed substantial to almost perfect agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the two test formats give similar total scores and subcategory scores for children aged 2-4. For children older than 2 years and 6 months, the agreement for matching items is as high as 83.68% (1,318/1,575). The computer-based test is thus highly recommended for this group of children. For children younger than 2 years and 6 months, a modified computer-based test is suggested to accommodate their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"411-419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed at exploring the feasibility of applying a computer-based language test to young children aged 2-4 years.

Methods: Thirty-two Cantonese-speaking children, aged 2-4 years, were recruited from local kindergartens. All participants underwent an assessment using both the computer-based and paper-pencil versions of the Macau Cantonese Language Screening Scale for Preschool Children, following a crossover study design. A short break of 15-30 min was provided between the two assessments. The data were analysed at three levels: the overall test, subcategory, and individual item levels. At the overall test and subcategory levels, data were analysed using the paired samples t-test and ICC. At the item level, the percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa value were selected to assess the agreement of the two test formats.

Results: Excellent agreement was found for the overall test level, and good agreement was observed for four of the five subcategories. At the individual item level, 28 of the 35 items showed more than 80% agreement, and 16 items showed substantial to almost perfect agreement.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the two test formats give similar total scores and subcategory scores for children aged 2-4. For children older than 2 years and 6 months, the agreement for matching items is as high as 83.68% (1,318/1,575). The computer-based test is thus highly recommended for this group of children. For children younger than 2 years and 6 months, a modified computer-based test is suggested to accommodate their needs.

对幼儿应用计算机语言测试。
引言:本研究旨在探索将计算机语言测试应用于2-4岁幼儿的可行性。方法:从当地幼儿园招募32名讲广东话的儿童,年龄2-4岁。根据交叉研究设计,所有参与者都使用电脑版和纸笔版的澳门学龄前儿童粤语筛查量表进行了评估。两次评估之间有15-30分钟的短暂休息时间。数据分三个层次进行分析:总体测试、子类别和单项水平。在总体测试和子类别层面,使用配对样本t检验和ICC对数据进行分析。在项目层面,选择一致性百分比和Cohen的kappa值来评估两种测试格式的一致性。结果:总体测试水平非常一致,五个子类别中的四个子类别也非常一致。在单项水平上,35个项目中有28个项目的一致性超过80%,16个项目的基本一致性几乎达到完美。结论:这些结果表明,这两种测试形式对2-4岁儿童的总分和子类别得分相似。对于2岁6个月以上的儿童,匹配项目的一致性高达83.68%(1318/1575)。因此,强烈建议这类儿童参加计算机考试。对于2岁6个月以下的儿童,建议采用改良的计算机考试来满足他们的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信